Skip to main content

DC runs your gadgets, so why not your house? This DC dwelling dares to try

Anyone who’s seen the Drunk History about the War of Currents knows Nikola Tesla was the electric Jesus who helped bring alternating current (AC) to the world, much to the chagrin of direct current (DC) proponent Thomas Edison. At the time of the Chicago World’s Fair in 1893, DC was the standard, but George Westinghouse started to win bids based on Tesla’s current, including one to power the world’s fair. Eventually, AC overtook DC because it was easier to transfer from the power station to the home, but DC power is what is used in many electronics in the home.

“It’s not meant to showcase what already exists. It’s really about what’s next.”

Recommended Videos

Laptops, solar cells, LED bulbs, and electric vehicles all run on DC power. When your computer’s charger gets hot, it’s giving off wasted energy as it converts AC to DC. But a small, 399-square-foot home in Detroit doesn’t need to do any converting. Run by NextEnergy, a nonprofit organization, the NextHome is a DC-connected house that’s a “living laboratory” for a variety of smart-home and energy technology.

“We have AC and DC running through the walls and through its wall plugs to add flexibility to the type of power that can be delivered to the loads inside the house, whether it’s your laptop or the TV or potentially the refrigerator,” Wayne Snyder, NextEnergy’s IT program manager, told Digital Trends when we toured the home. A power-distribution system from NextTech steps down the high voltage DC to a 24-volt level that gets delivered to the wiring. “The intent is to make the system safer to use, there’s less work that a licensed electrician has to do, there’s more flexibility,” says Snyder. “It’s not meant to showcase what already exists. It’s really about what’s next.”

The one-level, three-room building sits in the nonprofit’s parking lot. Outside the home, painted spring green, are two electric vehicle charging stations. One supplies both AC and DC power.

NextEnergy-NextHome_0023
Jenny McGrath/Digital Trends
Jenny McGrath/Digital Trends

“Depending on what the vehicle battery management system is capable of supporting, we can charge faster or slower, AC or DC, so it adds flexibility to the future electric vehicle and hybrid electrical vehicle cars that we test and demonstrate out here,” says Snyder.

The DC charging gun uses a communication language for smart-grid applications, Smart Energy Profile 2.0. That means it can talk back and forth with the house, relaying messages about when to start and stop charging. If there was a grid outage, for example, the house could actually draw energy from the car’s battery. If cloudy weather meant the solar panels were providing little energy, the house could put the car’s charging on pause until sunnier skies prevailed. While the AC/DC charger isn’t open to the public, the other electric vehicle charger is.

Up top, the solar panels might actually be making too much energy — more than the house can use. Often, homeowners sell that surplus back to the power company, but the DC home can take it and store it in the Bosch storage system, with no extra conversion step. That’s one reason NextEnergy wanted to build the NextHome: AC must be converted to store it.

There are 16 channels in the DC power-distribution system, each providing up to 100 watts of power, primarily for low-powered devices. A single channel could light three bulbs, for example. But not everything runs on DC, at least, not yet. “It’s not going to power a stove or refrigerator,” says Snyder. The home still has AC for those appliances, but Bosch is working with NextEnergy to retrofit the fridge it supplied to accept DC current.

Jenny McGrath
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Jenny McGrath is a senior writer at Digital Trends covering the intersection of tech and the arts and the environment. Before…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more