Skip to main content

Self-lacing Nikes can’t make you dunk, but they’ll still turn heads

We love it when a gadget from science fiction makes its way into reality, and while we still don’t have flying cars or time machines, Nike has at least made the self-lacing shoe — like those seen in Back to the Future II — an actual thing you can buy. Nike’s latest take on the self-lacing shoe is the Adapt BB, built for playing basketball. The Adapt BB has already graced the highest stage in basketball — Boston Celtics player Jayson Tatum wore them in an NBA game earlier this season — but for the average consumer, are they worth $350?

Recommended Videos

First, an explanation of the unique technology inside the shoes, a system Nike calls Electric Adaptable Reaction Lacing, or E.A.R.L. From the outside, the Adapt BB looks like a typical basketball shoe, albeit without visible laces. The tongue and upper portion of the shoe are covered in Nike’s Quadfit mesh, beneath which hide the laces, which are connected to a motor in the soles of the shoe. When you put your foot in, a sensor in the sole triggers, and the motor pulls the laces, tightening the shoe around your foot. There are also buttons on the sole to manually adjust the fit.

The Adapt BB squeezes to conform to the user’s foot, which means that, no matter the particular shape and contours of your foot, the shoe should fit snugly like a glove for your foot. Unfortunately, the shoes can feel a bit stiff at first, and they grip the entirety of the foot, which feels different than a traditional basketball shoe.

The Adapt BBs only weigh a bit more than a pair of Lebron 15s, so they won’t slow you down on the court.

The shoes are packed with electronics. In addition to the motor, there are a variety of sensors, and lights, and there’s an associated app to adjust the setting on the shoes and even change the colors of the lights. The shoes do need to be recharged, but Nike has built a wireless charging pad, so you can simply drop the shoes on there and let them charge for a few hours (it takes about four hours to fully charge them, and the charge should last for about two weeks of regular wear).

One potential hazard these shoes face that a traditional pair wouldn’t is that, because they are built around electronics, they can fall victim to software issues. This has happened once already, as Android users got a bugged firmware update that rendered some shoes unable to lace. Although Nike worked to fix the problem, bugs are always going to be a problem for smart devices.

Overall, the Adapt BBs are pretty nifty, but they won’t elevate your game, and at $350, they cost significantly more than a pair of Jordans or Lebrons. Still, they will certainly turn heads when you wear them around town, and they’re pretty comfortable for walking around in.

Will Nicol
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Will Nicol is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends. He covers a variety of subjects, particularly emerging technologies, movies…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more