Skip to main content

Ossia Cota can wirelessly charge electronic devices throughout your home

ossia cota tile cloud ces 2017 rsz img 20170104 155933  1
Image used with permission by copyright holder
It’s safe to say that Ossia, the wireless pioneers behind over-the-air charging platform Cota, gave one of the most impressive demonstrations at last year’s Consumer Electronics Show. And this year is no different. The company’s founder and chief executive, Hatem Zeine, showed an analog clock, a USB charger, and a AA battery charging feet away from a wireless base station. But in a sit-down with Digital Trends, the firm’s focus was less on the Cota’s technological underpinnings and more about its partnerships, implementations, and form factors.

The Cota, for the unintiated, is a somewhat nebulous term for Ossia’s wireless charging technology. It comprises a transmitter, a receiver, and software to manage it all. The transmitter, which comes in form factors ranging from an illuminated monolithic white cylinder to a drop ceiling tile, charges Cota-compatible devices using hundreds of omnidirectional antennas that beam radio (RF) waves 100 times a second.

Recommended Videos

They receivers lie mostly dormant, triggered only when a Cota-compatible receiver sends a packet of information indicating it’s low on power. The Cota then directs the needed energy to the transceiver’s relative location, or to multiple transceivers’ locations. The devices needn’t be stationary — the Cota transmitter re-establishes disrupted connections within milliseconds.

The hardware is improved from last year. Multiple Cota devices can be linked to expand the power radius several feet. And Ossia devices can charge up to dozens of devices simultaneously, albeit at a slower rate — each additional receiver requires that a Cota transmitter to spread a limited amount of power thinner.

But the biggest news this year was the Cota Cloud, a highly granular management platform. It’s somewhat akin to wireless router software: Cota transmitters’ power output is customizable on a per-device basis. An administrator can view the power levels of connected receivers, prioritize power delivery for one at the expense of another, and deny access entirely. Alternatively, Cota’s built-in software can perform those tasks automatically, granting devices with high energy requirements more power than others.

But the possibilities extend far beyond basic device management, Zeine said. A manufacturer could implement a “pay-to-play” service that’d require users to fork over a fee for wireless charging. A wireless carrier could limited access to paying subscribers. Or a restaurant could charge for power by the minute.

Zeiene proposed a more radical scenerio: Subsidized products. An expensive smart home lock could be discounted hundreds of dollars, for instance, but charge a user 10 cent every time they enter a PIN code.

Payment schemes aren’t the only capability the Cota Cloud enables. Thanks to Cota’s wireless medium of choice — radio waves — Cota-compatible devices can simultaneously transmit information to Cota base stations — information which manufacturers can use to track habits. A wirelessly connected toothbrush, for example, could send daily usage stats to the manufacturer. And though it hasn’t been implemented, Zeine said location tracking is well within in the realm of feasibility: A Cota transmitter could use devices’ metadata to track their location within inches.

Ossia is working with manufacturing partners to develop products based on Cota’s patented technology. The company’s inked deals with case maker XPNDBLS, Molex, and Japanese electronics company KDDI. Zeine envisions smoke alarms and smart appliances that never need a battery replacement, smartwatches that recharge on your wrist, smart home cameras that don’t require an adapter, and medical devices with a constant supply of wireless power. And he projects that manufacturers will eventually begin to take the liberties that wireless charging affords. Phone manufacturers might be comfortable settling for a smaller battery in exchange for a bigger processor or an additional sensor, for example.

“The reason that people want to charge quickly is because you give up your device and you want it back,” Zeine told Digital Trends. “But if you have a power system at home and one at the office, let’s say you spend eight hours in the office and 10 hours at home, that’s 18 hours of continuous charging, and that’s roughly equivalent to an iPhone 6 charging from zero to 100 percent three times.”

Ossia cleared a regulatory hurdle in December, safely passing the same safety thresholds for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth operations as the Federal Communication Commission requires. It expects the first compatible devices to launch in the coming months.

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more