Skip to main content

Boeing-backed passenger drone contest offers weird and wonderful designs

Traveling about on your own personal flying machine may still sound far fetched to most folks. But when you learn that an aviation giant like Boeing is supporting the idea to the tune of several million dollars, you might start to wonder if there’s something in it.

Recommended Videos

The Boeing-backed GoFly contest, which is also sponsored by aerospace manufacturer Pratt & Whitney and more than 20 international aviation and innovation organizations, is reaching its final stages with the top entrants getting ready to show off their weird and wonderful creations at a special three-day event at NASA’s Ames Research Center in California starting February 27.

The five finalists in the $2 million contest have spent the past year developing their prototype designs to create a drone-inspired contraption that can actually carry a person in flight. Hopefully, without crashing.

Specifically, the competitors were tasked with creating a safe, quiet, ultra-compact, single-person vehicle device capable of vertical takeoff and landing, and with a range of 20 miles. The machines can use batteries, gasoline, or aviation fuel for power.

The contest attracted designs from around 850 teams in more than 100 countries before being whittled down to the final five.

They include the ERA Aviabike designed by the Aeroxo team from Latvia and Russia, a machine that can be loosely described as a motorbike with wings.

From Florida-based DragonAir Aviation we have the Airboard 2.0, which the team says is an “all-electric, heavy lifting, self-stabilizing, multi-copter that carries a single passenger in a standing position.” Here’s a prototype in action:

Dragon Air Aviation Airboard 2.0

The S1, from Dutch team Silverwing Personal Flight, features two electric ducted fans, a passenger shell for safety, and a landing gear and battery pack that’s integrated into the wing.

From Texas-based A&M Harmony we have the Aria, a cute little number that looks as if someone has cracked open a giant egg and fitted it with flying smarts.

And finally, from California, we have Trek Aerospace’s FlyKart2, a sleek design that’s supposed to be “inexpensive to build, own, and operate.”

Here’s a gallery showing all five finalists:

At the final next week, a cool $1,000,000 will be awarded to the team judged to have the best performing machine overall. A $250,000 prize will go to the quietest machine, with the same amount of cash going to the team with the smallest vehicle. A bonus prize courtesy of Pratt & Whitney will go to the team with the most innovative technology.

The GoFly contest reflects the growing interest in compact, electric-powered flying machines for transportation in urban areas, with companies both big and small keen to get involved.

We’ll be sure to follow up on the GoFly event with a report on the overall winner.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more