Skip to main content

Before robot soccer players can beat humans, they’ll need to stop toppling over

Robocup 2017
Judging by some of the footage coming out of this year’s RoboCup soccer challenge in Japan, the organizer’s stated ambition to build a team of autonomous robot players good enough to beat a team of professional human players by 2050 seems a little, shall we say … optimistic?
Recommended Videos

Take the game (above) played the other day between two teams vying for glory at the annual event, which brings together more than 3,500 dedicated developers from some 40 countries.

As you can see, the humanoid robots seem rather better at falling over than kicking the ball. Perhaps they’ve been programmed with the mind of the legendary Dutch striker Arjen Robben, a player well known for his love of taking dives in a devious bid to gain advantage via a free kick or penalty kick. But these particular bots appear to be going down for the heck of it, though their ability to quickly get back on their feet is, it has to be said, very impressive.

Pretty much throughout the video, the diminutive robots hit the deck almost at random. If they were human, the crowd would assume they’d been out on the sauce the night before and were yet to fully recover. But these are robots. Robots that have a serious problem staying on their feet.

The ability to remain upright is mighty important when it comes to winning a soccer match, so some serious software and hardware advances will have to be made before programmers and engineers have any hope of meeting the bold 2050 deadline. At this rate, the likes of Ronaldo and Messi could probably be brought out retirement at that time and still beat the team of hopeful robot players.

The good thing is that despite the robots’ current clumsiness, some of them are scoring goals — another important factor for winning a game. So there is hope. And with every stumble, tumble, and trip, the developers building the bots will have more data to analyze to help them hone their designs.

Indeed, this year’s RoboCup contest has reportedly seen significant improvements in the way the robots’ kick the ball and also how they plan moves. So with 33 years to go, maybe — just maybe — the robots will have a fighting chance of taking on a team of skillful human players. Be sure to check back in 2050 to find out.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more