Skip to main content

Faster than a speeding — elevator. Shanghai Tower claims to have world's fastest

shanghai tower fastest elevator
123RF/WilliamPerry
In our era, that 15 minutes of fame everyone is entitled to seems to have become shorter and shorter. A recently completed elevator in the Shanghai Tower now claims the title of “World’s Fastest Elevator.” But for how long?

When it was completed in 2015, the Shanghai Tower garnered the impressive if somewhat lackluster title of “World’s Second Tallest Building,” being outdone by the Burj Khalifa in Dubai by nearly 700 feet. However, could the Shanghai Tower at least hold first place for the speed of its state-of-the-art elevator? Engineers believe so.

Recommended Videos

Thousands of people travel up and down the Shanghai Tower on a daily basis. With such a massive number of humans bustling in and out, speed is the name of the game. As buildings worldwide continue to outdo one another — in terms of height — the need for more efficient elevators is greater than ever. The engineers at Mitsubishi Electric felt that with the Tower, they were up to the daunting task of creating the crown jewel in elevator tech.

The previous record holder was the CTF Finance Center in Guangzhou. That elevator — created by Hitachi — is capable of lifting passengers at the breakneck speed of 65 feet per second. The elevator has the capacity to zoom from the bottom floor to the 95th floor in an unbelievable 45 seconds.

The elevator in the Shanghai Tower can lift passengers at a speed of nearly 46 miles per hour, or more than 67 feet per second. Mitsubishi Electric claims the elevator can travel from the second level basement to the 119th floor in 53 seconds. No word was offered on what state the passengers would be in when they arrived there.

This wasn’t just a feeding frenzy to create the world’s fastest elevator. Mitsubishi also incorporated an array of performance features into their record-breaking product. There are vast improvements to safety features, like buffer and braking upgrades as well as a speed governor. It should also be noted that the elevator has the capacity to switch between various speed settings as well. Depending on the levels of traffic at any given time, the elevator can travel between 40 and 46 miles per hour.

It may seem like the ability to lift a big box upward, more quickly than others would be rather simple, and it is. However, when you’re talking about traveling at near-highway speeds and stopping rather suddenly, it is important to consider the comfort level of passengers onboard. Not to mention the basic limitations and structural integrity of the cables. Is this as good as it gets, or have the elevator wars only begun?

Some engineers believe the Shanghai Tower elevator can and will be topped, however, the apex in performance is on the horizon. Albert So, an elevator engineering expert, recently reiterated this sentiment in an interview with CNN:

“I predict the maximum speed of a vertical lift cabin cannot be more than 79 feet per second,” noted So. “This is not because we can’t make lifts that go faster than this, but because of the air pressure.”

That sure sounds like a challenge.

Dallon Adams
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Dallon Adams is a graduate of the University of Louisville and currently lives in Portland, OR. In his free time, Dallon…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more