Skip to main content

Shkreli’s at it again, plotting to make a windfall off a drug price hike

shkreli chagas drug price hike again martin
NEPA Scene
Martin Shkreli made news in September when his company Turing Pharmaceuticals, bought the rights to a drug for toxoplasmosis, a parasitic infection, and raised the price from $13.50 to $750 a pill, only to back down when he realized such a move was incredibly unpopular. Earlier this month, Shkreli spent $2 million on RZA’s one-of-a-kind album, and later saying he hasn’t listened to it. Now he’s stoking the world’s hatred again, this time by planning to profit from a drug that treats Chagas disease, a parasitic infection that threatens the lives of millions of people worldwide.

Chagas is transmitted by triatomines, insects that live in mud and straw housing. It can be transferred human to human through organ transplants or blood transfusions, via breastfeeding, and congenitally. As it’s generally found in rural areas and slums in South America, and the millions infected abroad are generally low-income or poor, Chagas is considered a neglected tropical disease. While the disease is not of huge concern here in the United States, 300,000 people here are infected, and the practice of hiking up drug prices to extreme levels is relevant worldwide.

Recommended Videos

The drug in question, a version of benznidazole, is owned by KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, which an investor group led by Shkreli took control of last month. The drug itself is given free to patients by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on an experimental basis and sold overseas. It’s currently not approved for sale in the U.S., but Shkreli plans to pursue FDA approval.

If he gets it, according to The New York Times Shkreli told investors the company would have exclusive rights to sell benznidazole in the U.S. for five years. He said he would set the price at levels comparable to hepatitis C drugs, and that’s as much as $100,000 for a course of treatment.  This is compared to current costs of about $50 to $100 for a two month course of benznidazole in Latin America.

The drug has been around since the 1970s. Developed by Roche, the company donated its supply to Lafepe, a Brazilian state government company. Another company, Elea, out of Argentina, also became a supplier in response to a shortage of the drug a few years ago.

There is a federal program designed to encourage pharmaceutical companies to develop drugs for neglected tropical diseases that provides “priority-review vouchers.” Those vouchers guarantee a fast track to an FDA ruling on a future application for an unrelated drug within six months. A speedy FDA ruling is incredibly valuable in the big pharma arena, and can be sold to other corporate entities for multimillion-dollar windfalls. Perhaps Elea, the Argentine company has the same idea, since it too is planning to apply for FDA approval.

Aliya Barnwell
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Aliya Tyus-Barnwell is a writer, cyclist and gamer with an interest in technology. Also a fantasy fan, she's had fiction…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more