Skip to main content

Interactive images show what U.S. cities might look like without the Clean Air Act

smog clean air act losangelessmog
Creative Commons
American air quality isn’t perfect in major cities but it might have been a whole lot worse if the federal government hadn’t passed the first Clean Air Act of 1963 and the more sweeping Clean Air Act of 1970. Two amendments and over 45 years later, the quality of American air is on the rise.

But what if these laws had never been enacted? How would American cities look if emissions were allowed to run rampant?

Recommended Videos

In a study funded by energy research firm Save on Energy, researchers have attempted to illustrate what major American cities might look like without federal measures to control air pollution. The results make a strong — if exaggerated — case for regulation.

“On a global scale, millions of people are dying and getting sick as a result of poor air quality.”

With the Chinese city of Xingtai as a baseline, the researchers used an equation to determine how air particles affect visibility. They added a smog filter to clear sky images of 10 of America’s most populated cities and adjusted the visibility effect based on population and potential pollution. Xingtai is one of the world’s most polluted cities so the images can be seen as worst-case scenarios.

Save on Energy researcher Emily Pierce explained the reasoning for using Xiangtai as a baseline. “There were assumption to be made about how much pollution would exist and what that could look like,” she told Digital Trends. “The biggest contributors to pollution are vehicle exhaust, factories, and mines. Some of our cities have more cars and some of our cities have more industrial produced pollutants, like Xingtai.”

The images are intended as support for regulations already enforced by the federal government but also as a sign to other nations about the importance of controlling emissions.

“Thankfully, the U.S. has been proactive in its approach to curbing atmospheric pollution,” Piece said. “However, on a global scale, millions of people are dying and getting sick as a result of poor air quality.”

Dyllan Furness
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Dyllan Furness is a freelance writer from Florida. He covers strange science and emerging tech for Digital Trends, focusing…
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more
Rivian, VW venture kicks off next-gen platform for R1, Scout EVs
Rivian R2, R3, and R3X

The big challenge for Rivian, the EV maker known for its innovative electric and software systems, has long been how to reach the next stage of growth.

That stage came within reach in June, when the California-based company and Volkswagen announced a joint venture involving a $5 billion injection from the German automaker.

Read more