Skip to main content

Invisible ‘sonic net’ makes birds avoid airports, stops them from being obliterated by planes

Airfields are high-risk areas for bird strikes, sonic net could keep them away
Jan Kranendonk/123RF.com
Birds and airplanes don’t play well together, and collisions can end badly for both the birds that crash and the passengers aboard the aircraft. That’s why a new technique uses ambient noise to create a ‘net of sound’ that birds dislike so intensely, they stay away from the area completely. The sonic net doesn’t harm nearby bird populations, but it does keep them away from flight paths at popular airfields so that everyone involved can take off and land safely.

In order to test the technique, researchers set up speakers and amplifiers around a Virgnia airfield. For the first four weeks of the trial, during which there was no ambient noise turned on, they observed an abundance of birds in and around the airfield. But for the last four weeks of the trial, they activated the sonic net by generating ambient noise at a volume level comparable to a busy restaurant. Results from the trial showed that the number of birds in the areas covered by the sonic net decreased when it was activated, particularly in the case of high-risk species like starlings.

Recommended Videos

In the past, technologies to curtail bird strikes have been limited outside bird-proofing airplanes themselves. Many options involve killing at-risk birds, scaring them off, or relocating them completely, none of which are animal-friendly techniques and most of which are ineffective solutions. Bird strikes cost as much as $937 million annually in the United States alone. Between 1988 and 2013, bird strikes were responsible for 255 deaths, and have done immeasurable damage to the populations of migratory birds.

Without doing any damage to the bird populations, the sonic net technique makes it difficult for birds to hear each other. The ambient noise is about as loud as the predatory noises that birds are trained by evolution to heed, so without a clear shot at hearing those warning signs, birds are uncomfortable.

“The birds don’t like it and leave the area around the airfields, where there is potential for tremendous damage and loss of life,” said John Swaddle, the University of Exeter research associate who led the study. In the future, the bird-deterring system could even be used to clear other areas where migratory species are at immediate risk, like solar farms and wind turbine fields.

Chloe Olewitz
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Chloe is a writer from New York with a passion for technology, travel, and playing devil's advocate. You can find out more…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more