Skip to main content

Spelunk in relative safety with the CaveSim virtual cave

Cave diving isn’t something you casually do — okay, you could, but we’d recommend against it. In fact the National Speleological Society, the U.S. caving association, strongly encourages cavers not to divulge the location of caves on Websites or by word of mouth. This is due partly to the danger that spelunking risks but also to reduce vandalism and environmental damage. 

Because of the hush hush and implied physical challenge, it’s difficult to determine what exactly you’re getting yourself into before you hit the actual site. It’s hard to work on your skills or warm up to the feat before driving in head first.

Dave Jackson solves that problem with CaveSim, which lets prospective cavers get a taste for the sport by providing a virtual indoor cave environment. It’s an interesting way of protecting the fragile nature of caves while bridging the disconnect with potential cavers. Jackson’s device is similar to a rock gym in that it is a controlled simulation that lets climbers try spelunking without buying gear, joining clubs, or paying for tours. 

According to the CaveSim website, Jackson came up with the idea after attending a 2008 cave rescue seminar. At the time nothing similar to the CaveSim existed so the conference organizers created a makeshift cave out of furniture and tape. Unfortunately, it created bad habits in the rescue cavers which translated to the real cave that the seminar practiced in later. Parts of the cave were damaged due to errors made by climbers.

It took Jackson two years to create the 48-foot long virtual cave that twists and bends over its 13×18 foot area. CaveSim includes cave-esque feature with built-in electronic sensors that prove feedback on cavers’ performance.  When climbing through an actual cave, knocking into formations can be harmful to both you and your surroundings; with the sensor system, CaveSim encourages participants to crawl through as carefully they would during the real thing. 

At the moment only Jackson’s original CaveSim exists. Jackson and his wife, Tracy, travel around the country to various caving events with the CaveSim. Currently, the Jackson’s are attempting to get a trailer that they can affix the CaveSim into permanently and making it easier to transport. 

The Jacksons are also offering customized cave systems for sale to amusement parks, climbing gyms, and similar businesses. Due to the large size and their limited production capacity, the Jackson’s only offer their services out on a small volume for interested businesses. While the Website does not feature pricing information, we’d imagine this is a “call for details” situation. 

Scott Younker
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more