Skip to main content

Science aims high, delivers splash-free urinals to a grateful world

splashproof urinal research 40640071  white porcelain urinals against a yellow and orange tiled wall
johndwilliams / 123RF Stock Photo
Men, get ready to save on laundry and dry cleaning expenses. Science and technology have given us antibiotics, the internet, and space travel but to date have not solved the problem of urinal splashback. That momentous breakthrough, however, may be coming soon.

Researchers at Oxford University who were working on preventing the splashback of infectious and other harmful liquids in hospitals and kitchens have realized a less dangerous but socially significant application: splash-proof urinals.

Recommended Videos

Earlier solutions to pee-sprayed trousers have focused on shields or inserts, that are used with conventional urinals. The “Oxford solution,” however, wouldn’t require that the stream hit any particular area of the urinal — as long at it is directed anywhere inside the appliance, you’re good.

According to Oxford lead researcher Professor Alfonso Castrejón-Pita, of the Department of Engineering Science, “We believe soft surfaces with the correct stiffness could be used in a number of situations in which ‘dangerous’ or ‘nasty’ fluids are used. It’s surprisingly easy for droplets to turn into aerosols or sprays when they splash.”

The research has shown that rubber or gel coatings could do the trick. “There’s certainly more work to be done in this area. The softer you make a material, the stickier and weaker it often becomes — two things which aren’t ideal for making useful, long-term coatings,” Castrejón-Pita continued.  “The main challenge of this work is how to overcome that. Luckily, recent work has started to develop new materials that can be soft, strong, and non-sticky — like tough hydrogels — so there are certainly a lot of approaches to be explored.”

The original impetus for the Oxford work was the splashing of dangerous chemicals and biomaterials. Using instrument trays during surgery and washing raw chicken before cooking, for example, are both of significant concern because of potential splashing of human body fluids or raw chicken fluids. “And,” as Castrejón-Pita said, “the development of a splash-free urinal would also be welcome.”

Of course with splash-proof urinals guys will have another challenge — where to look when accuracy no longer matters.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Hyundai Sonata Hybrid’s solar roof can deliver up to 700 miles of ‘free’ driving
2020 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid

Previous

Next

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more