Skip to main content

Here’s everything you need to know about the Boring Company

Elon Musk is best known for Tesla electric cars and SpaceX. But his new tunnel-making venture, aptly named “The Boring Company,” wants to revolutionize the way that Americans travel — not up in powerful space rockets this time, but rather beneath our cities. Here’s everything you need to know.

Recommended Videos

Why is Elon Musk obsessed with tunnels?

In the words of the Boring Company, “roads must go 3D.” Musk and his company believe that going underground is a better choice than mass air travel. “Going up” in flying cars will create a whole new set of problems including noise, weather concerns, and the safety of pedestrians below them. With tunnels, traffic is pushed underground, limiting noise and preventing the division of communities that a large multilane highway exacerbates.

Construction of these tunnels is all but invisible to those on the surface, and the Boring Company argues that as more capacity is needed, a new tunnel can be built to address it. He likes the idea of tunnels because they’re long-term, they won’t have much impact on current city structures, and (naturally) because it’s a little sci-fi. It also ties in well to Musk’s high-speed, long-distance transit passion (including dreams like the Hyperloop), and the possibility of connecting nearby cities to each other.

The Boring Company was founded to look into ways of making underground tunnel construction more feasible.

So, what is The Boring Company exactly?

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Humans have been digging underground tunnels for thousands of years, so at face value Musk’s idea seems a little bit silly. Why would a man who’s spent many years working on next-generation technologies focus on something we already do well? The simple answer is efficiency.

We might be able to construct tunnels better than we have in the past, but that doesn’t mean we do it efficiently or in a cost-effective manner. A great example of this was Boston’s so-called “Big Dig,” which pushed most of the highway systems through downtown Boston into tunnels. Inefficiencies and cost overruns inflated the cost of that project to $22 billion, and it took 15 years to complete. even worse, the end product was of questionable quality, even though it has had a generally positive effect overall.

The Boring Company hopes to prevent construction nightmares like the Big Dig. It’s not reinventing the wheel; what’s different here is they’re using old-fashioned underground digging more efficiently. Specifically, the Boring Company aims to vastly increase the speed at which tunnels can be dug and at a far cheaper rate than is now feasible. It will help dig the tunnels itself, using its own assets — with a bit of high-tech thrown in.

What does The Boring Company do differently?

Elon Musk

The Boring Company focused on several areas of tunnel digging to improve the process overall. Some of the advancements include:

  • New TBMs (tunnel boring machines): Current TBMs operate very slowly — about 14 times slower than the movement of s snail, the Boring Company says. It is developing a brand-new TBM that is still slow (only marginally faster than a snail) but will dramatically decrease digging time. The new TBM operates with electricity and with three times the power.
  • New support strategies: Currently, TBMs spent about half their time tunneling, and the other half building supports. The Boring Company wants to develop a way for its TBM to do both at the same time.
  • Smaller tunnels: Tunnels built by the new TBM are only 14 feet wide, half the size of modern one-lane tunnels. As a result, tunneling becomes three to four times cheaper.
  • R&D: No research and development has occurred in tunneling in nearly 50 years. The Boring Company plans to invest significant resources into developing new methods and equipment to further speed up the process.

What current projects is The Boring Company involved in?

Boring Company Digger
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Musk and the Boring Company have been doing real tunneling work for the better part of two years now. Construction of a small test tunnel wrapped up in June 2017, however it wasn’t ready for a public demonstration until December 2018. That tunnel is 1.14 miles in length.

The company did have plans to build a second tunnel that ran parallel with the 405 freeway (beneath Sepulveda Boulevard) along Los Angeles’ west side, but it was scrapped after community pushback. Other projects are still underway, including some pretty crazy ones.

The company proposed a loop system in August 2018 that would shuttle Los Angeles Dodger fans and concertgoers from the Los Feliz, East Hollywood, or Rampart Village neighborhoods to Dodger Stadium. The total trip is expected to cost passengers just $1 to ride, and would get them to the stadium in 4 minutes. Currently in the environmental review and permitting stages, no date for construction or opening has been set. Construction is expected to take less than 14 months.

It also was selected by the Chicago Infrastructure Trust to “design, build, finance, operate and maintain” an O’Hare Express loop service. This system will  connect Block 37 in downtown Chicago with O’Hare Airport Terminals 1-3.

Perhaps the biggest and most ambitious project is a proposed tunnel connecting Baltimore with Washington D.C., which would allow individuals to travel between the two cities in about 15 minutes. Construction of the tunnel is expected to take between 12 and 20 months depending on the speed of the TBM. The long-term goal is to build a tunnel between New York City and D.C. The trip is expected to take only 30 minutes.

Many of these projects currently are not much more than proposals, but a few have begun, and Tthe Boring Company is going to be busy for the foreseeable future.

What issues still need to be addressed?

Boring Company Model
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are a number of issues with digging new transportation tunnels, some that the Boring Company has addressed and some it has not. They include:

  • Earthquakes and vibrations: The Boring Company assures people that its tunnels are too deep for any meaningful vibrations to be felt. It maintains that tunnels don’t really get damaged in earthquakes, and can’t cause them, so it doesn’t consider this an issue.
  • Dirt: The Boring Company has developed technologies that allow it to recycle the dirt from digsinto bricks and paving stones. It even is looking for ways to use these bricks for a portion of the tunnel lining.
  • Emissions: The company uses an electric skate method to transport gas-burning equipment (unfortunately, tunneling equipment needs a lot of power and cannot be fully electric yet). This helps cut down on at least some emissions involved in the process. Presumably, once tunnels are completed, they will be equipped with electric cars and vehicles.
  • Size: Fourteen-foot tunnels are small, and primarily have been used for sewer and stormwater projects in the past. A lot of work is left to be done in developing cars and a transportation equipment that can be used in these smaller tunnels. The company has offered some interesting mock-ups in the past. But would these new tunnels be required to use Boring Company vehicles?

If you live in NYC, D.C., or another city riddled with public transit, you have probably noticed (especially in recent years) that the big problem with subways and similar solutions is maintenance. Tunnels may reliably stay the same, but underground equipment wears out very fast and is very difficult to replace or keep running on a reliable schedule over time. In other words, you can have the best tunnels in the world, but unless the city devotes enough resources to maintenance and updates, they are going to run into a whole lot of problems.

Ed Oswald
For fifteen years, Ed has written about the latest and greatest in gadgets and technology trends. At Digital Trends, he's…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more