Skip to main content

The Karmic Oslo looks like an eibike Apple would design and build

If you’ve ever wondered what an ebike might look like if it were designed by Jony Ive or the team that he left behind at Apple, you may want to have a look at the Kickstarter page for a new product called the Karmic Oslo. This hybrid bike/scooter combo features a unique look that mimics a familiar aesthetic that we’ve seen from Apple for years, while still managing to carve out its own identity. The result is an intriguing new ebike that is long on looks, with some interesting features to go along with it.

Recommended Videos

The Oslo was created by a company called Karmic, which has been developing ebikes in San Francisco for more than four years. With its latest product, the designers wanted to create a model that was as approachable and easy to ride as possible, which is why the Oslo resembles a scooter more than a traditional bike. It’s wide and long seat is meant to be a throwback to the old “banana” bike seats that were common on kids’ bikes in the 1960s and ’70s, while its easy approach angles make it simple to get on and off. Wide, cushy tires help absorb some of the bumps of the road, increasing comfort and adding stability.

The ebike is built on an aluminum chassis and thermoplastic body panels. This helps to keep it relatively lightweight – just 44 pounds – while maintaining durability. Hydraulic disc brakes, integrated headlights and a wraparound taillight add an extra measure of safety and stability while standard bike components are used throughout. This should make it easy to maintain the bike over time, although Karmic does offer a two-year warranty on the Oslo.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Rated as a “Class 2” ebike, the Oslo has both pedal assist and throttle options. This gives riders the ability to either use the pedals as a way to extend battery life or take it easy and use the built-in throttle to propel them along. Karmic says that the ebike’s standard 250-watt motor is paired with a 480 watt-hour battery, which gives the Oslo a top speed of around 20 miles per hour and a range of about 20 miles. Those who suffer from range anxiety don’t have much to fear however, as the bike comes with an easily replaceable battery pack that can reportedly be swapped out in under 30 seconds. Those who don’t want to carry a spare battery around with them can relax, as the designers say that larger battery packs are in the works.

Karmic is hoping to raise $200,000 to get the Oslo into production and, if successful, intends to launch it in June 2020. Early bird backers can reserve one for themselves now for as little as $1,499, which is fairly reasonable for an ebike with these kinds of specs. Just keep in mind that there are inherent risks with any crowdfunding campaign before pledging your hard-earned cash.

Find out more about the Oslo on the Karmic website or Kickstarter page.

Kraig Becker
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kraig Becker is a freelance outdoor writer who loves to hike, camp, mountain bike, trail run, paddle, or just about any other…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more