Skip to main content

Compostable cutlery could help solve the world’s waste plastic crisis

Edible and Compostable Utensils

Plastic cutlery may look pretty innocuous, but it’s one of the worst contributors to the current global waste plastic crisis. In the United States alone, some 40 billion plastic utensils are reportedly thrown away each year after only a single use. That’s a pretty darn shocking statistic — and it’s one that is going to require some pretty bold thinking to help reverse.

Recommended Videos
From 3D-printed prostheses to burgers grown in science labs to smarter mobility for the elderly or infirm, tech improves our lives every day in a million ways beyond simply making things more convenient. Tech can have a meaningful impact — that’s why we call it Tech for Change. Here are the companies and people fighting to make a difference.
Tech for Change

One company taking on this problem is pioneering new San Diego-based startup TwentyFifty. The company is named after the year 2050, the year in which the amount of plastic waste in the ocean is estimated to exceed the amount of fish. TwentyFifty has developed a line of compostable cutlery, which promise to decompose entirely in less than one month. Its knives, forks, and spoon products are made from 100% natural grains including corn, soy, and wheat. Not only do their makers offer assurances that they will break down quickly, but they’ll even fertilize your garden as they do — thereby hopefully kickstarting the growth of more grains.

Despite their ability to decompose, however, don’t worry that the cutlery won’t do what it’s intended to do when it comes to dishing up your food. The utensils are suitably solid, and heat resistant up to 170 degrees F, including when faced with hot water.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

While other compostable cutlery brands are available, TwentyFifty’s creators claim that they have the edge. Some alternative compostable utensils utilize corn starch as a base for their products. These utensils have to be broken down into extremely small pieces and then composted at high temperatures before they will effectively biodegrade. Even when this biodegradation process takes place, they can leave a sticky material, similar to resin, which may harm soil and cause methane gas to be released. Left in a backyard compost heap, such alternative utensils would take around two years before they had fully decomposed. That’s not necessarily what most of us would think of as compostable.

TwentyFifty’s cutlery is currently available to purchase online. Prices start at $10 for 12 compostable utensils. Granted, that’s a fair bit more than you’d pay for their single-use plastic alternative. Then again, if we keep using the established plastic cutlery we may not have a planet worth selling cutlery on in the not-too-distant future. We will watch with interest to see how TwentyFifty does with its mission. The journey to more sustainable kitchen utensils starts here!

Luke Dormehl
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more