Skip to main content

Ostrich-inspired running robot doesn't need smart sensors to balance

2016-2017 IHMC Planar Elliptical Runner
Chances are that at some point you’ve used an elliptical trainer, or cross-trainer, in the gym. A piece of equipment designed to simulate stair climbing, walking, or running, for most of us the cross-trainer is simply a way to break a sweat without putting excessive pressure on our joints. For the team at the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, however, its mechanism presents another possibility — the model for an innovative running robot.
Recommended Videos

“We wanted to use something that would be familiar to everyone, so we took a bicycle-like mechanism that you’ll see in almost any gym in the form of an elliptical trainer,” research associate Johnny Godowski — who has been working on developing efficient, dynamic high-speed legged robotic systems since 1981 — told Digital Trends. “What we did was to adopt that mechanism, take the place where you would usually put your feet, and put that on the control point below the knee so that the mechanism drives the legs.”

The result is a clever, self-balancing two-legged robot called the Planar Elliptical Runner. Rather than using sensors and a computer for to stay balanced, the ostrich-inspired robot boasts just one motor and a nifty design that lets its run on a treadmill at 12 mph — seemingly without too much difficulty. All it needs to control the amount of power given to the motor is an RC car radio controller, which slows it down or speeds it up according to what its dealing with.

The advantage isn’t just that it can outrun us over long periods of time, either. Godowski explained that the biology-inspired design also makes it responsive to terrain.

“It’s emulating what you see in nature,” he continued. “Birds are able to run over holes and obstacles half their leg height, and they don’t even break stride. Our robot mechanism is designed to do the same thing.”

The mechanism, he added, could be applied to a wide variety of robots, ranging from two-legged runners to four-legged sprinters — or even underwater creations. As such, he described it as a less a new form factor than as a new “class of form factors.” It’s yet another exciting example of the flexibility of modern robots.

“Large parts of the land surface of the planet are not accessible to wheeled or tracked vehicles in any meaningful way,” Godowski said. “This work is about opening up new possibilities.”

Luke Dormehl
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more