Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Can we talk? Mobile users enjoy voice assistance, but want more accuracy

By

voice assistance improvements applications survey assistants windows mobile
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Can we talk? Most mobile users are generally positive about voice assistance tech on their mobile devices. However, even casual users would like more interaction and better conversational accuracy, according to a new survey conducted by research and analysis firm Creative Strategies for Artificial Solutions, a natural language interaction (NLI) company.

The study asked about the survey participants’ voice assistance use, enjoyment, why they did or didn’t use voice assistance, and what improvements they would like. Participants were also queried about where and how they would like more voice interaction and what they would like to use it for. Survey respondents included mobile users between the ages of 16-64 in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy, Germany, Japan, and China.

Recommended Videos

While only a little more than 20 percent of the respondents reported using their devices’ voice assistants daily, 68 percent reported that they like doing so. Among those who did not use voice assist the most common response was, “I do not see a reason,” which Creative Strategies says indicates “a desire for better and more robust applications.” Seventy percent of those who do use voice assist wanted better query comprehension.

Users universally wanted more functionality and improved conversational accuracy, which Artificial Solutions equates to a desire for higher levels of NLI.  According to Artificial Solutions CMO Andy Pearl, “The results of this survey are not surprising to us at Artificial Solutions, as we have been building for the future of voice-assisted technologies that work in 35 languages for over ten years, and our customers have consistently told us they want AI solutions that feel like natural human conversation.”

When asked about applications for voice interaction, the responses were, in order of priority, use in cars, in homes, with digital and communications services, in travel, and in banking.

Desired voice control features in cars included navigation, temperature control, and infotainment systems. At home, the users said they’d like to be able to use conversational speech to control television and other entertainment media, to ask questions, for information, and to access and control smart home automation systems and devices.

According to Tim Bajarin, principal analyst with Creative Strategies, “The results of this survey prove that natural language technology and artificial intelligence is here to stay. Forward-thinking companies should be jumping on AI technology today or risk being left behind by companies providing a better conversational experience for the digital consumer.”

Topics
Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown
Contributing Editor
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still 1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more