Skip to main content

Watch Japanese cops use a net-equipped drone to catch a ‘rogue’ quadcopter

High-tech Japan has opted for a surprisingly low-tech approach for dealing with remotely controlled copters caught flying over important sites in the nation’s capital.

The solution? Drones with nets. That’s right, forget drone-destroying “death ray” machines and advanced geofencing systems designed to help the authorities keep the skies safe. Tokyo cops have instead decided it’s a better idea to use a large net-equipped drone to ensnare suspicious multi-rotor machines caught flying over the city.

Recommended Videos

The move follows a major security scare in Tokyo earlier this year when a drone carrying radioactive material landed on the roof of the prime minister’s office in an apparent political protest.

Tokyo’s Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) has been training up a special drone unit to watch over the prime minister’s office, as well as the country’s parliament building, the Imperial Palace, and other high-profile locations scattered throughout the capital.

The MPD said that using a net meant there was little chance of targeted drones dropping from the sky and possibly causing injury to innocent bystanders.

If the specially trained unit spots a rogue copter flying in a restricted zone, the operator will attempt to catch it using a three-meter-by-two-meter net attached to a six-rotor drone, believed to be DJI’s professional Spreading Wings S900 machine. On its website, DJI describes the S900 hexacopter as “highly portable, lightweight, strong, and stable.” Perfect, then, for taking down smaller drones.

In a recent demonstration of its system (shown above), we can see the net hanging down from the cops’ flying machine as it whizzes after its target. The smaller copter is swiftly taken out of action as its propellers become caught in the net’s mesh.

“Terrorist attacks using drones carrying explosives are a possibility,” a senior member of the police department’s Security Bureau told the Asahi Shimbun, adding, “We hope to defend the nation’s functions with the worst-case scenario in mind.”

The new drone unit will be deployed at one location this month before expanding to more sites in February. The department’s somewhat unique approach to drone security was announced as the country rolled out new laws governing the use of the increasingly popular unmanned aerial vehicles.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more