Skip to main content

Who needs a frickin’ laser? Desktop waterjet cutter slices through stone, steel

Introducing WAZER, The First Desktop Waterjet
When you think about a machine capable of slicing through everything from stone to stainless steel, what do you expect it to use as a cutting implement?

If you answered lasers, diamonds, or laser-shooting diamonds, prepare to be surprised: Wazer’s new desktop cutter uses nothing more threatening than high-pressure water, combined with sand-like abrasive particles — and it works well.

Recommended Videos

“Right now, there are a lot of great desktop tools, but they’re limited in terms of what they can cut,” Wazer co-founder Nisan Lerea told Digital Trends. “The most widely used parallel to what we’re offering would be a desktop laser cutter, which works similarly — only using lasers instead of water. The problem with a desktop laser cutter is that it can only cut through soft materials, such as wood and plastic. We’ve created a tool that can cut through virtually any material: steel, titanium, aluminum, stone, ceramic tiles, glass, a whole variety.”

Waterjet cutting has been used industrially for decades, but until now it has remained out of most of the public’s hands. These machines, which carry a price tag of around $100,000 and occupy entire rooms, were something no artisanal maker could easily afford — unless that maker turned out to be Elon Musk.

Wazer’s desktop option changes that. Lerea said that he first started working on the concept as an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania in 2012.

“At the time, we didn’t have access to a waterjet cutter,” he said. “As a result, as part of my work, we spent a lot of time cutting metal parts using hand tools. We came up with the idea of building a small-scale, low-cost waterjet cutter for the university, which is how we built our original prototype.”

The unit being sold on Kickstarter is compact, contained, and can fit in pretty much any workshop. Carrying a price tag of $4,000, it puts a precision-cutting technology previously only available to a few in the hands of the many. As of Tuesday, the Kickstarter had far surpassed its goal of $100,000 — totaling more than $655,000 — and only one machine is available at $4,500.

“One of the main engineering challenges has been not only getting this machine to be small enough to fit into a regular workshop, but also to do that at a price point that would make it accessible to individuals,” Lerea said. “We’re really happy to be able to offer this at the price that we are.”

Luke Dormehl
Former Digital Trends Contributor
I'm a UK-based tech writer covering Cool Tech at Digital Trends. I've also written for Fast Company, Wired, the Guardian…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more