Skip to main content

Wearables for Good challenge looks to help the underprivileged through tech

Huawei wearables 4
Simon Hill/Digital Trends
Wearables such as the Apple Watch and Fitbit may seem like trivial toys for the wealthy, but the new contest Wearables for Good is looking to harness the power of this technology to help the poor and underprivileged in developing nations. In a joint effort headed by the UN agency UNICEF and the U.K. chip company ARM, designers are being challenged to develop wearable tech ideas that will aid in health and education efforts for the millions across the world without access to these basic human rights. Joining them is the San Francisco-based strategy and design company Frog, along with representatives from Google, Orange, Singularity University, the Red Cross, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s SENSEable City Lab.

The project seeks to distill the basic advantage of wearables — an easy and quick access point to vital information like pregnancy tracking or a sensor that counts breaths per minute to warn of early stage pneumonia. Alternatively, these devices could be used as emergency alert systems, notifying wearers of impending dangers or risks in environments where communication capacities are often limited.

Recommended Videos

Applications are currently being accepted on the Wearables for Good website, and following the August 4 deadline, two winners will ultimately be selected in the fall. The prize package will include $15,000 and consultations with experts from partners Frog, Google, and others on the development and implementation of the best ideas.

Speaking with Wareable, Denise Gershbein, executive creative director at Frog, noted, “there are countless opportunities for wearable and sensor technology to make more of an impact in emerging markets, particularly in the next wave of social impact development. With the ‘Wearables for Good’ challenge we hope to foster dialogue among new partners and increase cross-discipline innovation.”

Erica Kochi, co-founder of UNICEF Innovation, the branch of the organization that leverages technology to achieve the agency’s goals, told The New York Times, “We’re looking for entries that are scalable and sustainable. We don’t want something that is a neat idea, but there’s no marketplace for it.” And this marketplace will be a tricky one — geography, resources, and culture will have to be taken into account to ensure that the developed devices are actually useful for their users.

It’s an ambitious project, to be sure, but UNICEF has already taken many of the necessary steps to help ease the process, Kochi said. The agency has already begun establishing relationships with governments, while corporate partners are implementing the groundwork for the actual development of the products. As Simon Segars, chief executive of ARM, told the Times, “The cost of innovation is the lowest it’s ever been,” which makes now the perfect time to strike for social good.

Lulu Chang
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Range Rover’s first electric SUV has 48,000 pre-orders
Land Rover Range Rover Velar SVAutobiography Dynamic Edition

Range Rover, the brand made famous for its British-styled, luxury, all-terrain SUVs, is keen to show it means business about going electric.

And, according to the most recent investor presentation by parent company JLR, that’s all because Range Rover fans are showing the way. Not only was demand for Range Rover’s hybrid vehicles up 29% in the last six months, but customers are buying hybrids “as a stepping stone towards battery electric vehicles,” the company says.

Read more
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more