Skip to main content

The future of making stuff: Inside the evolution of 3D printing with Formlabs

When 3D printing went mainstream in the mid-2010s and exploded in popularity, it was about as hyped up as it possibly could be. Evangelists told us it would fundamentally transform the way goods were made, and usher in a bold new era of creative freedom. Soon, they said, we’d be able to fabricate anything we wanted on-demand, Star Trek replicator style, right from the comfort of our own homes.

Recommended Videos

But of course, 3D printing didn’t really live up to that high-flying dream. Instead, it made a momentary splash and then largely returned to the fringes, gaining adoption in hobbyist workshops and cutting-edge product design labs, but not really changing the face of manufacturing in the way many hoped it might.

Why? Well despite making some big leaps forward, additive manufacturing has been hamstrung by a lack of variety in materials options. You can print anything you want — as long as it’s plastic. That’s why the technology has mainly been used for producing prototypes and not durable end-use parts.

But that’s starting to change. To get a better sense of where things are headed, we caught up with Formlabs — arguably one of the most innovative and agile companies in the industry — at CES 2021 to get an inside look at the future of making stuff.

From machines to materials

At CES 2021, the latest thing that Formlabs is showing off isn’t a fancy new machine. It’s a material. Specifically, a new wax-based resin designed to enable ultrafine, high-detail prints that can be cast and used to create molds for jewelry making.

It’s certainly not the most flashy bit of tech to headline with at CES, but while this one material by itself might not seem particularly significant, it’s a perfect illustration of where the 3D printing industry is heading. More and more, the focus is shifting away from hardware innovations and improvements on machinery, and more toward expanding the range of materials those machines can create stuff with.

The level of surface detail on this ring is insane. Notice how my fingerprints look enormous compared to the layer lines, which are practically invisible Drew Prindle

“We‘ve always been kind of focused on materials,” says Kathy Bui, Formlabs’ engineering verticallead, “but there’s a big emphasis on them recently mostly because the technology on the hardware side is starting to mature. In the end, a 3D printer is a tool. So having a great tool, but really no materials to go along with it, makes the tool less powerful. So our renewed emphasis on materials is intended to unlock new applications and allow people to do more things with the tool, because that tool is only as good as what comes out of it.”

To illustrate this point, Formlabs sent Digital Trends a sample box filled with objects that showcase some of the company’s latest materials. Many of these would have been unfathomable to pull off on a desktop-sized printer just a few years ago — like a 3D printed spring that’s as strong and springy as metal, a heatproof dryer attachment that won’t melt at high temps, and a bottle opener that’s nearly as hard as steel. There’s even a new suite of biocompatible resins in the lineup that makes it possible to print medical devices.

“It’s a huge step change,” says Bui. “I think it opens the door for a lot of consumer product development.”

Building beyond prototypes

Importantly, Formlabs isn’t alone in this pursuit. The shift in focus from hardware to materials engineering is happening across the additive manufacturing industry. Big players like Stratasys and 3D Systems, as well as newer contenders like Carbon 3D, are also stepping up their efforts in materials development, and increasingly using their extensive materials libraries as a way to differentiate themselves from competitors. The race to master materials is on.

You can’t tell just from looking at them, but these objects are made from some of the most cutting-edge materials on Earth. Each one has a completely different set of physical properties, despite starting life as a puddle of viscous goop. Drew Prindle

But what exactly does that mean for the future? As Formlabs sees it, it means moving away from prototyping and finally ushering in the print-anything-on-demand future we’ve been dreaming about for the past decade.

“In terms of the next five or 10 years,” says Bui, “I think the industry as a whole is probably going to start moving towards end-use and more manufacturing use — not as much focus on prototyping.”

However, she’s quick to note that 3D printing’s utility for prototyping isn’t going away anytime soon, and that 3D printers will still be an invaluable resource for product designers. The difference is that, with better materials, they’ll be able to produce dramatically better prototypes — ones that actually have the qualities and abilities that they’re looking for.

“We’ll probably see much better design products for people because you can test and fail quickly and again and again. So in the next few years, I think that the product development cycle will shorten even more and see even better products than we have now.”

So while you probably aren’t jumping up and down with excitement over the company’s latest resin, you should definitely be excited for what that resin — and others like it — will make possible in the near future.

Drew Prindle
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Drew Prindle is an award-winning writer, editor, and storyteller who currently serves as Senior Features Editor for Digital…
3D-printed replica of Michelangelo’s David statue is less than 1mm tall
3d printed david statue poppy seed

Towering in at a colossal 17-feet tall, Michelangelo’s David statue is a spectacular work of art. Well, it turns out that it’s no less impressive when it’s under one millimeter in size -- as experts from 3D-printing company Exaddon and the Laboratory of Biosensors and Bioelectronics at ETH in Zürich, Switzerland recently made clear.

In a dazzling demonstration, the collaborators teamed up to re-create the iconic David statue at two different (although both exceptionally tiny) scales. One was scaled down to 1:10,000, while the other was miniaturized even further to a scale of only 1:70,000. To put that pair of figures in context, the first one is around the same size as a poppy seed, just under 1 millimeter. The second one is around a tenth of a millimeter. Both are recognizable as the David statue, although the smaller of the two loses quite a few of the details of its much larger sibling. At that size, it’s hard to blame it too much, though!

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more