Skip to main content

Sony doesn’t need a portable PlayStation, and neither do you

The Sony PlayStation Vita reached its end-of-life earlier this year when Sony terminated production. Now Sony has poured salt in the wound, with confirmation it’s not working on a new handheld console.

While it can be sad to see a cult favorite go, it’s no big loss for gaming. And it’s not a problem that Sony won’t build a new portable PlayStation. A lot has changed since 2012, when the PS Vita launched. There’s no good reason for Sony to make a new portable console, and no good reason for gamers to buy one.

Little to be gained by Sony

There’s one big reason to think Sony should make a portable console. The Nintendo Switch. Its success has lead gamers to wonder if portable consoles from Sony and Microsoft could do just as well.

But where the PS Vita made sense as a product when launched in 2012, there’s less room for  it in 2019 and beyond. It’s not just because the PS Vita struggled to attract customers in the same way the PlayStation 4 and Nintendo Switch, though that struggle does help justify Sony’s decision to abandon portable consoles. The real problems are the alternatives. There’s a lot of them.

Sony has proven it can handle game streaming. Amid the hubbub about Microsoft’s Project xCloud and Google Stadia, it’s all easy to forget that Sony has been offering its PlayStation Now game streaming service for over 5 years.

Google’s Stadia streaming already powers gaming on phones. Rich Shibley/Digital Trends

The PlayStation Now service lets players on PS4 and PC play games that are streamed over an internet connection. In the past, Sony has supported streaming to PS3, PlayStation Vita, and even some smart TVs and Blu-ray players.

Sony also offered a remote play system on the PS Vita, letting the portable console stream the video feed from games on a PS4. That feature has since found its way onto PC, Mac, iOS, and Android devices.

In 2020, Sony continues to use streaming as a means to make PlayStation games playable on different devices. That lets the hardware team focus on the PlayStation 5. Why build a separate, portable console when Sony could just offer PS Now for mobile devices?

Nothing to be gained by gamers

It doesn’t make business sense for Sony to build a portable console. It also doesn’t make sense for gamers to buy one.

Except for the holdouts still rocking flip phones or sliders, most of us now have a  capable device in our pockets. Our smartphones have sharp displays, with many exceeding six inches in size. In comparison, the PS Vita display was just five inches and had a resolution of only 960 x 540. Even some of the cheapest smartphones, like Motorola’s Moto G family, offer larger, higher resolution displays.

That hardware we keep in our pockets gets more powerful with each year. It would be more of a hindrance than a benefit for us to carry around a second device just for playing PlayStation games, as the hardware powering that experience would just fall further and further behind smartphone technology.

Yes, the Nintendo Switch has been a success in spite of smartphones, so Sony could just make their own take on a Nintendo Switch. But part of Nintendo’s magic is a game library that can be handled on less powerful hardware. Sony’s top exclusives (think God of War, Spider-Man, Horizon Zero Dawn, not to mention whatever comes to PS5) aren’t a good fit for a mobile device.

God of War on portable hardware? Doubt it. Image used with permission by copyright holder

That would force Sony to in some way split its library. If a new portable Sony console didn’t play all the same games the PS5 does, that would be a problem for gamers, and another feather in the cap for the Nintendo Switch.

That’s where game streaming can simplify matters. If you can stream games to your iPhone, Android phone, tablet, or computer, you’ll have plenty of options for how you play. You’ll save money by not needing a dedicated piece of hardware for Sony’s games.

In the case of some games, a 4G mobile connection would be enough to have a playable, enjoyable experience. Slower-paced games, like turn-based RPGS, wouldn’t need the same connection speeds or low latency as other titles. And for the fast-paced games, 5G is right around the corner.

Though there are only a handful of phones offering 5G in the US right now, and carrier 5G networks are highly limited, the 5G landscape is going to be different by the end of 2020. That’s going to open the door to a lot of cloud computing, and there’s no reason Sony couldn’t be one of the company’s taking advantage of just that.

What 2020 Should Look Like

Streaming isn’t likely to replace dedicated gaming hardware any time soon. The crisp imagery, fast frame rates, and near-instant responsiveness of local hardware will stay ahead of the compressed video feed, limited frame rates, and input latency of game streaming for a least a little longer.

But, that doesn’t mean game streaming won’t be a potent companion to dedicated hardware.

Gamers can enjoy the high-quality gaming experience they’re used to at home on the PlayStation 5. And, when they’re out of the house, they can use a smartphone to play games on the go.

Galaxy Note 10 Plus 5G
5G will bring the bandwidth needed to stream games everywhere. Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

As 5G mobile networks grow, the game streaming experience that will be available to mobile devices (including laptops) will get better, with lower latency and bandwidth. Sony could take advantage of that to offer different streaming service tiers for gamers who want higher resolutions or frames rates.

Would a portable console be more reliable? Sure. Would it be awesome to hold? Yes, absolutely. Novelty alone isn’t enough to carry a console, however. The Switch already exists. Any portable console from Sony would not only have to co-exist with the PlayStation 5, but also fight the Switch for portable supremacy.

Sony wouldn’t win that fight. Gamers would lose, too. Sony’s past portable consoles languished because the company couldn’t offer them proper support while focusing on the PlayStation. There’s no reason to think that would change in the future.

Streaming isn’t the best of both worlds, but it’s a good bit of each. Sony is right. It’s time to bury the dream of a portable PlayStation.

Editors' Recommendations

Heroes of Middle-Earth isn’t afraid to play with Lord of the Rings canon
An evil Galadriel in Heroes of Middle-Earth

The Lord of the Rings franchise has a storied history in almost every entertainment medium, and we are entering a new era for its film and gaming efforts. As Amazon continues to produce The Rings of Power, Middle-Earth Enterprises has been acquired by Embracer Group. Instead of all of The Lord of Rings' games being made by Warner Bros., which had been the case for some time, we are now seeing lots of studios make games in the Lord of the Rings universe, providing their own spin on the idea. While The Lord of the Rings: Gollum is doing that on consoles this month, mobile game players are also getting a brand new game.
The Lord of the Rings: Heroes of Middle-Earth is on the way from Capital Games and EA, and I attended a preview event for the game ahead of its launch on May 10. This game takes the character-collecting RPG approach established through its previous game Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes and gives it a Middle-Earth makeover. What’s most intriguing about the title, though, is that it’s not afraid to ask “What if?” while playing around in the world of this long-running franchise.
What if?
When it comes to gameplay, my brief playtime with Heroes of Middle-Earth didn’t surprise me. It’s exactly what you’d expect from a mobile character-collecting RPG set in The Lord of the Rings universe. Still, the character-based approach allows Capital Games to play in The Lord of the Rings sandbox in ways few creatives have been able to. It has more freedom to craft more experimental scenarios with the franchise's iconic characters, as it’s not as concerned with falling in line with lore.

The premise is that players have discovered a new Ring of Power, which they must use to keep The Lord of the Rings timeline intact as a mysterious enemy is trying to throw it in disarray. That setup means that the game can create scenarios that don’t necessarily align with the Middle-Earth canon. Players can make characters from different time periods, races, and allegiances team up in a way that wouldn’t work anywhere else. They’ll encounter a Galadriel who was corrupted by the Ring and other characters who may have strayed from the path laid for them in the books and films. Post-launch, some of these alternate versions of characters will eventually become playable as well.
In the age of the multiverse story in media, these kinds of “What if?” scenarios make for a novel The Lord of the Rings game set pieces and give the developers plenty of room to come up with future characters for players to collect. In a press roundtable, Heroes of Middle-Earth Design Director Jay Ambrosini was undoubtedly enthusiastic about these concepts but said the team is also making sure any of these ideas and alternate timelines that they do pursue feeling respectful toward the world J.R.R. Tolkien established.
“There are so many characters that you look at and see the small little decisions that happen and affect them, and it’s so fun to think about what happens if they made the other decision,” Ambrosini says. “They are fun things to explore and talk about, but the most important thing to us is that we’re telling a genuine Tolkien story and that we’re very faithful to the laws of the world that exist. Good deeds are rewarded with goodness; bad deeds are rewarded with bad things happening. We’re making sure that we’re appreciating and celebrating those pieces of Tolkien’s work.”

Read more
3 big things I need to see from the next PlayStation Showcase
Peter and Miles from Marvel's Spider-Man 2.

It’s that time of the year again when industry insiders are teasing that a big PlayStation Showcase will happen around June. A third-party focused State of Play happened in 2022, but now Video Games Chronicle’s Andy Robinson and Giant Bomb’s Jeff Grubb are both suggesting that a more first-party oriented "Showcase" could be on the way sometime during the next month, potentially during the week of May 25.
PlayStation has had a rough start to 2023, with console exclusive Forspoken garnering mixed reviews, the PlayStation VR2 impressing critics while underperforming in sales, and The Last of Us Part 1’s PC port being broken at launch. With only Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 confirmed to be on the horizon for 2023, Sony has a lot to prove during its next showcase. There are three specific things I need to see from Sony if that PlayStation Showcase does come to fruition.
Give PSVR2 purpose
The PlayStation VR2 is an impressive piece of virtual reality technology, but it lacks killer apps outside of Horizon: Call of the Mountain. New game releases for the headset have been slow since its February 2022 launch, which is likely why the $550 headset has underperformed. Sony has opted to mainly relegate PSVR2 to State of Plays or PlayStation Blog posts, but it needs to revitalize excitement for the platform by giving some of its games a spotlight in a big PlayStation Showcase.

Hopefully, there’s more on the way in terms of new AAA VR exclusives from first-party studios, as well as much-demanded ports like Half-Life: Alyx. Already announced PSVR2 games like Journey to Foundation and Synapse could also use release dates. A PlayStation Showcase is the perfect time for Sony to put out a clear road map for PSVR2’s future game library, just as the September 2021 PlayStation did for PS5. Give me a reason to strap on that headset yet again.
Flesh out the system’s 2023 exclusives lineup
PS5 needs a strong lineup for this fall as well. With the exception of Marvel’s Spider-Man 2, things look pretty barren for PS5 this year after the launch of Final Fantasy XVI. Several previously announced PS5 games still lack concrete release dates and could arrive in the second half of this year. It’d be nice to get a clearer picture of Sony’s PS5 game lineup for the rest of the year; hopefully, it includes titles like Stellar Blade, the Silent Hill 2 remake, Lost Soul Aside, Death Stranding 2, and Final Fantasy VII Rebirth.

Read more
Dreams live support is ending — and that’s a big misstep for PlayStation
Art fights a giant bird in Dreams.

Sony could’ve had its own popular proprietary game engine and metaverse. Instead, it just let it slip through its fingers.

Media Molecule is ending live support for Dreams, its highly ambitious game-creating and playing tool for PS4, on September 1. Its servers are staying online for now -- and it has a few more content updates in the pipeline before then -- but after August, there will be no new tools, ports, or events for Dreams. That means it’s not coming to PS5, PlayStation VR2, and, most critically, PC.

Read more