Skip to main content

Amazon reportedly pulls the plug on its rumored live TV streaming service

Amazon Fire TV
Bill Roberson/Digital Trends
As early as 2015, Amazon was rumored to be planning a live TV streaming service to compete with the likes of Sling TV and others, and was even said to be in talks with AMC and ESPN last year. This might have been a boon for Prime Video customers, but it appears we’ll never know, as those plans have now been dropped, Reuters reports.

The reason is simple: Amazon doesn’t believe that this type of service would be profitable enough to pursue. This makes sense in an increasingly crowded live TV streaming market. While Sling TV and PlayStation Vue would have been the service’s only competition when these rumored plans were in their infancy, those services have since been joined by offerings from YouTube, Hulu, DirecTV, and more.

Amazon was also reportedly unable to convince a sufficient number of broadcasters to join its Amazon Channels programming, which offers a la carte pricing for channels including HBO and Showtime, as well as a number of niche channels. Whether this was key to the company’s vision of a live streaming service is left for us to guess.

This isn’t the only rumored video offering from Amazon to be dismissed this week. Rumors of a free, ad-supported version of the company’s Prime video were floated earlier this week, but the company was quick to dismiss them, telling The Verge that the has no plans to create such a service.

Instead of offering content from other companies, Amazon seems intent on building its catalog of original content. The company recently announced that it had acquired the television rights for The Lord of The Rings, and has plans to develop a prequel series lasting multiple seasons. The fantasy setting may give the company a chance at capturing a Game of Thrones-level hit alongside its other well-received series like Transparent and The Man in The High Castle.

We’ll likely never know how Amazon’s rumored service may have differed from its competition, as the company has yet to publicly comment on the rumored streaming service or its reported demise. Fortunately there are still quite a few streaming services to choose from, each of which offers its own unique take on the basic idea.

Editors' Recommendations

Kris Wouk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kris Wouk is a tech writer, gadget reviewer, blogger, and whatever it's called when someone makes videos for the web. In his…
Sling TV versus Fubo
Sling TV.

On-demand movies available on Sling TV. Phil Nickinson / Digital Trends

There are a few options in the U.S. when it comes to streaming live TV. Sling TV and Fubo are two of them. They represent the less popular of the four major choices in terms of total number of subscribers (YouTube TV and Hulu With Live TV remain atop the list), but they are still very much worth considering.

Read more
Philo: everything to know about the live TV streaming service
Philo home page.

Are you considering cutting the cord on your cable TV to save some cash? With the rise of streaming services, it seems like that may not be as cost-effective as it once was. These days, you can find many channels on streaming platforms that could cost you as much as your cable subscription and internet service.

Do you need all those channels? Philo, a TV streaming service, begs to differ. It competes with TV streaming options like Sling TV and provides a more budget-friendly choice without sacrificing access to live television.

Read more
The upcoming sports streaming service is a textbook case of a ‘trollout’
The search box on the ESPN app.

There’s a phenomenon in the phone world that’s as smart as it is frustrating. That’s the one where a company announces an exciting new feature, only to eventually note that it’s going to roll it out in stages. You can’t get it now. You might not get it for a while. And if anything goes wrong, it’ll push things back further. (And you’ll likely not get any further communication.)

That, friends, is the “trollout.” It's mean to roll things out in a responsible way, in case things go wrong.

Read more