Skip to main content

CableVision to Launches Network DVR Appeal

U.S. cable television operator Cablevision announced today tht it is filing an appeal of a court decision which bars he company from introducing a DVR server which stores users’ recorded programming on the company’s own servers, rather than on set-top boxes located in subscribers’ homes. The appeal follows a court decision last month in which a U.S. District Court in Manhattan barred the company from launching the service, upholding complains from television networks and Hollywood studios that the service would violate copyright laws.

Cablevision’s plan for a “network DVR” would enable customers to set up recording schedules and features much the way traditional DVR users do today; however, instead of storing the recorded content on a set-top box in a user’s home, the video would be stored on the cable operator’s servers. When customers wanted to view the recorded material, it would be retrieved from the cable operator’s system and streamed to the customer over the cable network on an on-demand basis. “Our remote-storage DVR is the same as conventional DVRs, and merely enables consumers to exercise their well-established rights to time-shift television programming,” said Cablevision COO Tom Rutledge in a statement.

Recommended Videos

Movie studios and television networks disagree, arguing that storing content “on behalf” of a customer and re-transmitting that data over the cable network amounts to a re-broadcasting of the content, for which the cable company has no license. Studios and television networks would likely be willing to discuss a licensing arrangement for such a service—which, of course, would mean CableVision would be paying a premium for “network DVR”-capable programming. CableVision doesn’t want to do that: the whole point of the network DVR concept is to reduce CableVision’s costs by being able to centrally manage, maintain, and upgrade all the equipment and services needed to provide a DVR service without having to install, maintain, and upgrade individual DVR units in each subscriber’s home.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
You Asked: New device vs. new TV, connection conundrums, and CRT calibrations
You Asked

On today’s You Asked: When are streaming boxes and sticks better than smart TVs? What’s the best way to use the eARC port on your TV? Hisense USA president, David Gold, comes onto the show to address the trend of TVs getting bigger and where UST projectors fit into all of this. And should a CRT TV and retro gaming fan try to calibrate his own TV?
New streamer or new TV?

Tom Bickford has a 55-inch Roku TV from 2018 and is looking to upgrading to a 65-inch TV. With current Roku options more limited now, he says, should he buy the best TV in his price range, regardless of platform? Is there any disadvantage to using a Roku stick or box on a TV with a different smart TV system already on it?

Read more
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
How to cut the cord: quitting cable for streaming services
Roku Pro Series TV

If you're tired of paying too much for a cable subscription that doesn't deliver the shows you want to watch, then it may be time to cut the cord and head for greener pastures with streaming. Unlike the early days of streaming, the most popular streaming services and smart TVs now deliver access to huge amounts of content with VOD libraries, along with great new exclusive movies and shows. Even better, some streaming services also offer live streaming, which means you can still catch every new episode of your favorite shows without being hit with an expensive cable subscription.

Of course, having tons of options doesn't actually make figuring out which streaming service is right for you any easier. After all, Hulu + Live TV is different from Netflix, and when you start considering the options that Amazon Prime Video delivers, things get even trickier. When you throw streaming devices into the mix, it complicates everything even more. Have no fear, as we've got all the details you need to make an informed decision. Let's dig in.
Internet speed and streaming

Read more