Skip to main content

Canon Delays SED TVs

Electronics giant Canon has announced they are delaying the launch of their next-generation flat-panel SED televisions, citing the long patent licensing dispute with Nano-Proprietary over key SED technology, and saying they need time to develop production technology which will bring the manufacturing costs of SED panels low enough to make the systems commercially viable. Canon says it will offer a new launch schedule for SED televisions “at a future date.”

Canon had previously announced it played to introduce SED televisions in Japan during the fourth quarter of 2007, and the company had been building $1.5 billion factory in Japan to manufacture the technology. Canon’s delay calls into question the commercial viability of the SED technology in the mass market, particularly as prices drop for LCD televisions, and technology enhancements continue to improve response times and image quality in LCD panels.

Recommended Videos

Canon originally licensed key technologies for SED televisions from Nano-Proprietary; the company then teamed with Toshiba to form a joint venture (SED, Inc.) to develop and manufacture the televisions. Canon transferred its patent licenses to SED, Inc. and Nano-Proprietary sued, claiming the license couldn’t be transferred because Toshiba held decision-making authority in the joint venture. Canon fought the lawsuit—and eventually bought out Toshiba’s share of SED, Inc.—Canon was eventually found to have breached the license agrreement, although a jury found Nano-Proprietary had sustained no damages, although the original license agreement was terminated. This left Canon in the awkward position of needing to re-negotiate a licensing agreement for key SED technology. Presumably, one source of Canon’s just-announced delay in its SED launch is the difficult in re-licensing the technology from Nano-Proprietary…or finding a way to work around it.

SED technology has the potential to offer flat panel screens which are brighter, offer higher contrast ratios, and consume less power than LCD flat-panel displays.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
You Asked: New device vs. new TV, connection conundrums, and CRT calibrations
You Asked

On today’s You Asked: When are streaming boxes and sticks better than smart TVs? What’s the best way to use the eARC port on your TV? Hisense USA president, David Gold, comes onto the show to address the trend of TVs getting bigger and where UST projectors fit into all of this. And should a CRT TV and retro gaming fan try to calibrate his own TV?
New streamer or new TV?

Tom Bickford has a 55-inch Roku TV from 2018 and is looking to upgrading to a 65-inch TV. With current Roku options more limited now, he says, should he buy the best TV in his price range, regardless of platform? Is there any disadvantage to using a Roku stick or box on a TV with a different smart TV system already on it?

Read more
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
How to cut the cord: quitting cable for streaming services
Roku Pro Series TV

If you're tired of paying too much for a cable subscription that doesn't deliver the shows you want to watch, then it may be time to cut the cord and head for greener pastures with streaming. Unlike the early days of streaming, the most popular streaming services and smart TVs now deliver access to huge amounts of content with VOD libraries, along with great new exclusive movies and shows. Even better, some streaming services also offer live streaming, which means you can still catch every new episode of your favorite shows without being hit with an expensive cable subscription.

Of course, having tons of options doesn't actually make figuring out which streaming service is right for you any easier. After all, Hulu + Live TV is different from Netflix, and when you start considering the options that Amazon Prime Video delivers, things get even trickier. When you throw streaming devices into the mix, it complicates everything even more. Have no fear, as we've got all the details you need to make an informed decision. Let's dig in.
Internet speed and streaming

Read more