Skip to main content

Apple insists that a Beats headphone explosion wasn’t its fault

Beats explosion
Image used with permission by copyright holder
An Australian woman whose Beats headphones exploded on her head as she dozed on a long-haul flight in February has been refused compensation by Apple.

The tech giant, which acquired Beats in 2014, blamed a faulty AAA battery for the incident, which left the woman with some nasty-looking burns to her face and hands.

Recommended Videos

“Our investigation indicated the issue was caused by a third-party battery,” an Apple representative said in a statement issued by lawyers for the unnamed woman, according to Adelaide Now. The name of the battery maker hasn’t been disclosed.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Some older versions of Beats headphones — such as the set used by the woman — require a pair of AAA batteries that fit into one of the cans.

The incident occurred about two hours into a flight from Beijing to Melbourne as the woman napped with her headphones on.

She described what happened in a statement to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB): “As I went to turn around I felt burning on my face. I just grabbed my face which caused the headphones to go around my neck.

“I continued to feel burning so I grabbed them off and threw them on the floor. They were sparking and had small amounts of fire.”

A flight attendant alerted by the commotion used water to put out the fire, thereby preventing what could have become an even more serious incident.

The ATSB said at the time that both the battery and its cover melted and stuck to the floor of the aircraft, adding that for the rest of the flight the passengers “endured the smell of melted plastic, burned electronics, and burned hair,” while the owner of the wrecked Beats headphones said people were “coughing and choking the entire way home.”

In response to Apple’s claim that the fire was caused by a faulty AAA battery, the woman said via her lawyers: “The headphones don’t work without batteries, yet nowhere on the headphones — or their packaging — did it specify which brand of batteries should be used.”

It’s not clear if the woman is intending to continue her action against Apple, but the tech company, for one, is adamant that the Beats device itself was not the cause of this highly unfortunate incident.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Are Apple’s AirPods Max headphones really worth $549? Never say never
Apple AirPods Max

Apple's long-awaited over-ear noise-canceling headphones, the AirPods Max, are now a real product you can buy. And if you act quickly, you might even get them before December 25. But that assumes you're willing to pay Apple's heart-stopping price of $549. That's not just a lot of money; it's more than $150 over and above what Bose charges for its Noise Cancelling Headphones 700 -- a flagship set of active noise canceling (ANC) headphones with a very similar set of features.

Has Apple priced itself out of the market? When you compare the AirPods Max to current competitors, you could be forgiven for saying so. But we've been here before. It's still remarkable to me that folks are willing to spend up to $200 for the second-gen AirPods, when the market is saturated with true wireless earbuds that do more, sound better, and cost way less.

Read more
Apple’s over-ear AirPods Max noise-canceling headphones cost an eye-watering $549
A woman wearing the silver Apple AirPods Max.

The much-anticipated Apple "AirPods Studio" are here, but the over-ear active noise-canceling (ANC) headphones are officially called the AirPods Max, and the name isn't the only surprise. Apple's asking price of $549 sets a new high watermark for the over-ear ANC category. To put it in perspective, Sony's top-rated WH-1000XM4 are just $350, while their biggest traditional competitor, the Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700, sell for just $380.

The AirPods Max come in space gray, silver, sky blue, green, and pink, and they ship with their own carrying and storage case. They can be ordered via Apple.com starting today, with availability beginning Tuesday, December 15.

Read more
New Beats Flex earbuds flaunt fierce features for $49
The Beats Flex wireless earbuds in Yuzu Yellow.

Beats has introduced its most affordable earbuds yet, and while they don't follow the true wireless earbuds craze we've been witnessing for the past couple of years, they do appear to deliver a treasure trove of features and (hopefully) performance that could make them extremely popular.

The new Beats Flex are a $49 pair of earbuds joined by a single cable that runs behind and rests upon the neck. Inside that cable is Apple's W1 chip, which enables one-touch pairing with an iPhone or iPad, similar to the AirPods and AirPods Pro. The W1 chip also allows for quick switching among Apple devices synced to iCloud. The Beats Flex are also compatible with audio sharing, which lets a friend or family member listen in with you while having control of their own volume.

Read more