Skip to main content

Lawsuit May Delay SED TVs

The development of flat-panel televisions based on SED (surface-conduction electron-emitter display) technology may be delayed by a lawsuit filed against Canon by U.S. technology developer Nano-Proprietary Inc. of Austin, Texas.

Back in 2003, Canon and Toshiba joined forces to create a joint venture company, SED Inc, split almost 50-50 between the two companies: Canon owns 50 percent plus one share, and Toshiba owns everything else. SED Inc. was charged with developing flat-panel television displays based in SED technology; in a nutshell, SEC displays are like CRT televisions, but pack an electron emitter into every pixel so they use less power (and are far thinner) than their CRT predecessors. In October 2006, Canon and Toshiba announced they planned to start mass production of SED televisions in early 2008; however, those plans may have to be put on hold in the face of Nano-Proprietary’s suit.

Recommended Videos

Nano-Proprietary licensed technology used in SED displays to Canon; however, Nano-Proprietary is suing Canon claiming that SED Inc., is not a Canon subsidiary because, although Canon (barely) holds a majority stake, Toshiba still holds decision-making power over the company. Therefore, Canon’s license of Nano-Proprietary technology can’t be transferred to SED, Inc.: if they want to make SED TVs at the joint venture, they’ll need to execute a new patent license. And Nano-Proprietary’s case has been gathering some steam: in November, a judge refused to recognize SED, Inc., as a Canon subsidiary (PDF), allowing the case to move forward.

Japanese media outlets have offered contradictory reports on Canon’s plans to resolve the situation; Nihon Keizai Shimbun reports Canon will increase its stake in SED, Inc., so that it can be counted as a legal subsidiary, while Asahi Shimbun reported Canon and Toshiba plan to shut down the joint venture later in January.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
You Asked: New device vs. new TV, connection conundrums, and CRT calibrations
You Asked

On today’s You Asked: When are streaming boxes and sticks better than smart TVs? What’s the best way to use the eARC port on your TV? Hisense USA president, David Gold, comes onto the show to address the trend of TVs getting bigger and where UST projectors fit into all of this. And should a CRT TV and retro gaming fan try to calibrate his own TV?
New streamer or new TV?

Tom Bickford has a 55-inch Roku TV from 2018 and is looking to upgrading to a 65-inch TV. With current Roku options more limited now, he says, should he buy the best TV in his price range, regardless of platform? Is there any disadvantage to using a Roku stick or box on a TV with a different smart TV system already on it?

Read more
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
How to cut the cord: quitting cable for streaming services
Roku Pro Series TV

If you're tired of paying too much for a cable subscription that doesn't deliver the shows you want to watch, then it may be time to cut the cord and head for greener pastures with streaming. Unlike the early days of streaming, the most popular streaming services and smart TVs now deliver access to huge amounts of content with VOD libraries, along with great new exclusive movies and shows. Even better, some streaming services also offer live streaming, which means you can still catch every new episode of your favorite shows without being hit with an expensive cable subscription.

Of course, having tons of options doesn't actually make figuring out which streaming service is right for you any easier. After all, Hulu + Live TV is different from Netflix, and when you start considering the options that Amazon Prime Video delivers, things get even trickier. When you throw streaming devices into the mix, it complicates everything even more. Have no fear, as we've got all the details you need to make an informed decision. Let's dig in.
Internet speed and streaming

Read more