Skip to main content

Experts can’t agree which is best: LG’s new OLED or Samsung’s year-old plasma

LG OLED or Samsung plasma
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Each year, a group of videophiles,  professional calibrators, and tech journalists gather together at Value Electronics in Scarsdale, NY for a shootout of the consumer electronics industry’s best televisions. The end-goal is to answer a very difficult question: Which TV reigns supreme? This year, breaking news reports had LG’s 55-inch OLED (55EC9300) taking the crown as the people’s choice. But, at the behest of participants, a re-tallying and reconsideration of the votes commenced, resulting in a tie for the top spot between the LG OLED and last year’s winner, the Samsung F8500 series plasma. That’s right, the best TV in 2014 is a tie between a fresh TV that was only made available for purchase a week ago, and one that is over a year old now. How can this be?

Related: Samsung’s F8500 plasma is a Kuro Killer

Recommended Videos

As you can probably imagine, the answer is complicated, just as the evaluation processes  — and the adjudicators themselves– are complicated.  But the crux of the issue is this: Though measurements add a crucial element of objectivity, the task of whittling away the top contenders in order to choose the “best” TV (or the “best” anything else, for that matter) is often a highly personal — and therefore subjective — process.

Everyone has different standards and needs, so no one product can be the best for everyone. That being the case, a group of highly discerning, highly educated enthusiasts had a hard time agreeing which was better, LG’s latest OLED television, or Samsung’s plasma model, which is one of the few excellent plasma televisions you can still buy (a fact which is key to the discussion).

On one side you’ve got LG’s OLED, which has a lot going for it. It has excellent black levels, a stunning contrast ratio, resolves subtle shades of gray and color remarkably well, exhibits very good color accuracy, is pencil thin, and comes in at an unprecedentedly low price (for OLED technology). On the other side, Samsung’s plasma also exhibits excellent black levels (though not quite as impressive as LG’s OLED) very high brightness, even better color accuracy, superior motion resolution, and is more affordable still. The score card below illustrates how the two TVs fared in key performance metrics.

2014 Value Electronivs TV shootout results
Image used with permission by copyright holder

As you can see, the competition was tight. LG’s EC9300 OLED scored a total of 51.54 with an average score of 8.58. Samsung’s F8500 plasma pulled a 52.01 total with an average of 8.66. If you go by the total and average score, Samsung’s plasma appears to come out on top, but the LG OLED won more individual categories. And that’s just the popular vote. The event’s three professional calibrators, Kevin Miller, DeWayne Davis and David Mackenzie, picked neither of those two displays, instead favoring the Samsung KN55S9C OLED, which the company released last year.

Related: OLED vs. Plasma: Which display tech is better? 

The takeaway, as Value Electronics’ owner and event sponsor Robert Zohn puts it, is that video enthusiasts “strongly prefer self-emitting based displays over liquid crystal panels with edge lit or direct array light emitting diodes.” In other words, LCD panels with LED backlights can’t now, nor have they ever been able to, achieve the excellent picture performance that plasma and OLED displays can. With that said, we should point out that this year’s LED TVs — Ultra HD or otherwise — are the best we’ve seen yet, and for the average viewer, offer a sufficiently stunning picture at a very attractive price.

The results also tell an interesting story about how much videophiles love their plasma televisions. The Samsung F8500 pulled a narrow victory off against the Panasonic ZT60 and VT60 last year, and if either of those latter two TVs were still around, you can bet they’d be part of this discussion. But they aren’t available anymore — Panasonic quit the plasma TV business entirely — and the F8500 is on its way out, too, since Samsung plans to ditch plasma TV tech as well. Still, so long as the F8500 remains for sale, it should be part of the discussion, because, clearly, OLED can’t do everything plasma can do, and vice versa. It seems we have not yet developed the perfect TV, and that’s just fine.

For most of us, there are other important considerations not taken into account in a shoot-out like this: How is the smart TV interface? Is navigation and search quick and snappy? How easy is the remote to use? Is there an easy upgrade path for the television? Is the base stable? What is customer service like if I have a problem? So while the Value Electronics shootout is an excellent way to get a read on how the best TVs stack up against each other with key performance metrics, the “best” TV will always be the one that works best for you.

Topics
Caleb Denison
Digital Trends Editor at Large Caleb Denison is a sought-after writer, speaker, and television correspondent with unmatched…
Netflix password sharing: how the rules work and what you need to know
The Netflix TV show category on iOS.

Back in the day, it was enough for one person in your family or group of friends to have a single Netflix account that got shared around. However, all of that changed in May 2023 when Netflix cracked down on password sharing, making it much more difficult to share an account outside of your home.

Netflix is one of the most popular streaming services out there, and with good reason. It delivers a massive library full of old favorites and new movies and shows like Stranger Things, Bridgerton, and Will & Harper. The sudden shift away from Netflix password sharing meant everyone from old roommates to college students were left trying to figure out what the new rules meant, and whether they'd need to pick up their own Netflix account.

Read more
Meze Audio debuts its lightest and most affordable open-back headphones
Meze Audio 105 AER open-back headphones.

Romanian company Meze Audio has developed a cultlike following among audiophiles for its selection of uncompromising (and expensive) open-back and closed-back wired headphones. With prices that soar as high as $4,000, Meze's products haven't always been very accessible. However, its latest open-back model -- the 105 AER -- may bring many more folks under the Meze tent. At $399, the 105 AER are the company's most affordable open-back headphones to-date, as well as its lightest. They'll be available from mezeaudio.com in early December.

The 105 AER's design is a clear evolution from the more expensive 109 Pro ($799), with Meze's signature self-adjusting headband and generously padded over-ear cushions. Where these new cans carve their own path is by using a different mix of materials and shapes. The 105 AER use cast zinc alloy, stamped manganese spring steel, and polyurethane (PU) leather in the headband design, but avoid the 109 Pro's use of wood, which may help to explain the weight difference: 11.8 ounces for the 105 AER versus 13 ounces for the 109 Pro.

Read more
1mm-thick speakers could reshape smart glasses, smartwatches, and earbuds
xMEMS Sycamore microspeaker driver.

XMEMS, the company that created the first speaker based on a microchip manufacturing processes, is getting set to release its next wave of tiny speakers. Known as Sycamore, the newest model is just 1.13 mm thick, and weighs only 150 milligrams, yet it can reproduce full-range sound over short distances -- like the gap between your ears and the limbs of your smart glasses -- according to xMEMS.

Sycamore is the latest step in the evolution of micro speakers. XMEMS' first version could be used in wireless earbuds to reproduce high frequencies, but needed the help of a dynamic driver for bass. Its second product could do full-range sound, but was still limited to earbuds that seal the ear canal with a silicone tip. Sycamore is the company's first micro speaker that reproduce full-range sound without the need of a closed, sealed environment.

Read more