Skip to main content

RHA MA650 Wireless review

Ears come in all sizes. With tons of tips, these headphones fit them all

RHA MA650 Wireless review
Nick Hastings/Digital Trends
RHA MA650 Wireless
MSRP $99.95
“At just $100, the RHA MA650 Wireless offer a sublime combination of clarity and comfort.”
Pros
  • Warm, smooth sound
  • Lightweight and comfortable
  • AptX, AAC support
  • Bevy of included eartips
Cons
  • Lacking brightness and bass depth
  • Cumbersome cable length

Wireless earphones are quite common these days. Sneeze on a crowded train or bus (…okay, please don’t) and you’re reasonably likely to hit a pair. In a crowded segment, it can be tough to stand out, and while the RHA MA650 Wireless look snazzy, they don’t offer any groundbreaking or unique features.

Recommended Videos

Given that MA750 Wireless were decent – but not great – we weren’t expecting a whole lot from the cheaper MA650. That said, RHA is a solid brand which has impressed us over the years, and we’re happy to report that the British brand’s latest are actually pretty awesome.

Out of the box

With a hang tab on top and no shortage of iconography detailing the headphones’ many features, the packaging for the MA650 Wireless looks very much like it was designed for airport vending machines. That’s not a criticism, just an observation.

Inside the magnetically sealed box, the headphones are snuggled neatly in a gray foam block, arrayed in the shape of a stethoscope opposite some color-saturated photos on the fold-out flap. Pulling out the foam (and the plastic overlay) reveals three cardboard compartments with pictures identifying their contents: Replacement eartips, a short USB-C charge cable, and a silvery mesh carry pouch. Between the foam and the cardboard, we found a user guide and a warranty sheet.

The wide selection of eartips – four extra sets of regular silicone tips, two sets of flanged tips, and one set of Comply foam tips – continues a welcome trend from RHA, arriving in a neat little metal punch-out board. For some reason, there’s another spare set of silicone tips hidden in the carry pouch, too — not that we’re complaining.

Features and design

Once you extricate the headphones from their foam home, the first thing you’ll notice (well, the first thing we noticed) is that the connecting cables – including those connecting each earbud to the neckband — are long.

The earphones, clad in brushed aluminum, fit snugly into our ears with no discomfort and sealed relatively well.

We understand that some people have longer necks than others, but the length of the wires is such that strenuous exercise – running, Crossfit, anything more than basic weightlifting – can cause them to bounce around and become a distraction, if not an outright obstacle.

Thankfully, the earphones themselves, clad in brushed aluminum, fit snugly into our ears with no discomfort, and sealed relatively well (though we did prefer the fit of the Comply foam tips and/or the flanged tips). The rest of the package, apart from the 3-button inline remote and the ends of the neckband, is dressed in all white.

The neckband is molded from a rubbery material which felt comfortable against our skin, and stayed put thanks to weighted tips. The headphone casings are magnetic on the backs, so they snap together conveniently (and stay there) when hanging around your neck. Altogether, the headphones weigh less than 1.5 ounces.

RHA MA650 Wireless review
Nick Hastings/Digital Trends

Unlike the MA750 Wireless, the MA650 don’t have over-ear guides; they sit vertically, with the wire resting between the bottom flaps of your ear canal (or the tragus and antitragus, for you bio majors). The right side of the headphones — marked by a little white “R” on the inside of the wire — is where you’ll find the remote, the power button, and the charge port, covered by a little “Never charge wet” sticker. The MA650 are IPX4 rated, which means they’re fine for sweat and rain and not at all fine for full submersion.

RHA claims a 12-hour battery life for the MA650, which seemed accurate in our testing (after about 5 hours of listening, powering on the headphones triggered a “Battery below 60 percent” audio cue).

Another neat feature worth mentioning: The neckband vibrates to indicate calls or texts when connected to a phone.

Setup

To get things going, simply turn the headphones on (hold the power button down for a few seconds) and they’ll enter pairing mode. Pick them from your device’s Bluetooth menu, or tap an NFC-enabled device against the NFC logo on the left side of the neckband.

Performance

The $170 MA750 Wireless suffered from overwhelming treble, distorting the sound signature. The MA650 don’t seem to have this issue, though they’re not without fault. In fact, the opposite seems to be true here; instead of going overboard, RHA played it safe, resulting in smooth, warm audio that is pleasant and relatively accurate, if not exactly mind blowing. (It should also be noted that Comply foam eartips do tend to dampen treble a bit.)

The earphones, clad in brushed aluminum, fit snugly into our ears with no discomfort and sealed relatively well.

Thanks to support for aptX and Apple AAC, the MA650 offer impressive clarity for their class, revealing a level of detail you don’t often find in headphones at the $100 level (especially the wireless in-ear variety). For example, the vocals on A$AP Rocky’s Goldie are crystalline, and muted record scratches shine through below the beat.

Unfortunately, the beat itself doesn’t hit with much muscle, leaving us a bit crestfallen. The same goes for most percussion, as neither electronic 808s nor kick drums provided the sense of weight we wanted. Turning the volume up worked reasonably well – and, to RHA’s credit, produced no distortion – but you don’t want to shred your eardrums for some bass. Perceived bass response for in-ear headphones can very much be a product of fit, so other ears may have different results, but we wished for more down low.

RHA MA650 Wireless review
Nick Hastings/Digital Trends

We were also a little disappointed at the lack of brightness in the upper register, as moments like the guitar solo on Daft Punk’s Aerodynamic don’t quite attack with the sharp precision we crave. Listening to Tidal on the “Master” (CD-quality) audio resolution setting rectified this somewhat, but not everyone has that option.

That said, we appreciate the MA650’s sound overall, as every track is clear and balanced, no matter the genre. Consistent quality trumps moments of excellence, in our opinion – especially for earphones priced just above the budget segment.

Warranty information

RHA offers a whopping 3-year warranty and a 30-day “return & refund” promise. More info can be found here.

Our Take

The MA650 won’t knock your socks off in terms of audio reproduction, but they’re extremely comfortable, with a respectable battery life and a laundry list of useful features. They perform well enough – and consistently enough – that we can dismiss minor concerns about tonality. At $100 or less, they’re a good buy.

Is there a better alternative?

Depending what you’re looking for, there may be better choices. Given the MA650’s cumbersome cords, exercise junkies will be better off with something like the Jaybird X3 or the pricier Jabra Sport Pulse Wireless SE.

For more bass, check out the Optoma NuForce BE6i, and for a brighter sound, check out the Shure SE215 Wireless (though they’re a little more expensive). If you don’t mind spending $170, buy the Forza Metallo Wireless.

How long will it last?

The MA650 seem fairly sturdy overall, though the wires connecting the earphones to the neckband do feel a bit dainty. Unless you get water in the charge port, we imagine they’ll last more than long enough to get your money’s worth.

Should you buy it?

There are a lot of worthy headphones around the $100 price point, but if consistency and versatility are important to you, you should consider the MA650 Wireless.

Nick Hastings
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick is a Portland native and a graduate of Saint Mary's College of California with a Bachelor's of Communication. Nick's…
Sony is “the brand to beat” for ANC, and its XM5 headphones are $100 off
Sony WH-1000XM5 wireless headphones hanging on a wall hook.

What is there to say about the incredible Sony WH-1000XM5 Noise-Cancelling Headphones that hasn’t already been said? These flagship cans were released a couple of years ago, and we here at Digital Trends are just as enamored by the sound quality, comfort, and rock-solid battery life today as we were when our review first dropped. We gave them a perfect score of 10 out of 10. And while it can be challenging to come across headphone deals for premium products like the WH-1000XM5, we did find this great offer: 

For a limited time, when you purchase the Sony WH-1000XM5 Noise-Cancelling Headphones through Amazon or Best Buy, you’ll only pay $300. At full price, this model sells for $400. Our resident headphone expert, Simon Cohen, had this to say about the Sony XM5 headphones: “Sony proves once again that it's the brand to beat in noise-cancelling headphones.”

Read more
Hisense reveals a Sony Bravia Theater Quad competitor ahead of CES 2025
Hisense HT Saturn Wireless Home Theater System.

Hisense has a little pre-CES 2025 teaser for us, and it looks like the company is taking a page from Sony's home theater playbook. The new Hisense HT Saturn is a 4.1.2 Dolby Atmos "wireless home theater system" with four speakers and a single subwoofer, which uses a small HDMI ARC/eARC breakout box as a transmitter -- a similar configuration to Sony's Bravia Theater Quad.

Hisense hasn't released pricing or availability for the HT Saturn yet.

Read more
Sling TV celebrates the holidays with a rate increase that goes live today
Sling TV on a TV.

Happy holidays! Sling TV got you a present, and it's a $6-per-month price increase. As we reported last month, today marks the beginning of the new pricing for all of Sling's packages -- Sling Orange, Sling Blue, and the combo Sling Orange and Blue package. Costs per month for the three packages are now $46, $51, and $66, respectively, with half off your first month.

Sling attributes the increase to rising costs of programming "well above the price of inflation." It also points out "these increases are industry wide" and "Sling continues to be the most affordable option with offerings more than $20 less per month versus other providers." It's worth noting that Sling has been adding features throughout 2024, including 4K streaming of major sporting events such as the MLB All-Star Game, postseason, and World Series, the 2024 Olympics in Paris, and the U.S. Open in select major markets.

Read more