Skip to main content

SED Lawsuit Against Canon Dismissed

In a brief statement, electronics giant Canon has announced that the patent infringement case brought against it by Nano-Proprietary over its SED TV product development has been dismissed, with the jury returning a verdict that Nano-Proprietary sustained no damages.

Back in February, the court found that Canon had breached its patent license agreement with Nano-Proprietary by setting up SED, Inc., as a joint venture with Toshiba and then letting SED, Inc., use Canon’s license for Nano-Proprietary’s technology. Although Canon had bought out Toshiba’s share of the joint venture in order to clarify the patent situation, the judge was unimpressed. However, the jury apparently felt that Canon’s actions hadn’t caused Nano-Proprietary any significant harm.

Recommended Videos

Canon says it plans to appeal the court’s decision that it was in breach of its patent license agreement, which enabled Nano-Proprietary to keep the entire $5.5 milion license fee.

The resolution of the patent infringement suit doesn’t clear the way for Canon to develop SED televisions. Along with getting to keep the $5.5 million fee, Nano-Proprietary also got the original license agreement terminated, which means Canon now has no license to key technology. "Nothing about [the] verdict changes the fact that we have significant intellectual property that we believe will have to be licensed by anybody, including Canon, that wishes to sell televisions based on electron emissions in the broad geographical areas of the world where our IP is in effect," wrote Nano-Proprietary CEO Tom Bijou in a statement. In other words, if Canon wants to make SED televisions, it’s going to have to come back to Nano-Proprietary and negotiate a new license.

SED flat panel technology offers the potential to create flat-screen televisions that are brighter and use less power than traditional LCD flat-panel displays. However, the fracas over the technology may make development of SED panel impractical in the short and medium term—even if one has licenses to all the necessary technology—especially as prices for LCD panels continue to drop.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
You Asked: New device vs. new TV, connection conundrums, and CRT calibrations
You Asked

On today’s You Asked: When are streaming boxes and sticks better than smart TVs? What’s the best way to use the eARC port on your TV? Hisense USA president, David Gold, comes onto the show to address the trend of TVs getting bigger and where UST projectors fit into all of this. And should a CRT TV and retro gaming fan try to calibrate his own TV?
New streamer or new TV?

Tom Bickford has a 55-inch Roku TV from 2018 and is looking to upgrading to a 65-inch TV. With current Roku options more limited now, he says, should he buy the best TV in his price range, regardless of platform? Is there any disadvantage to using a Roku stick or box on a TV with a different smart TV system already on it?

Read more
Apple might once again be considering a TV of its own
The Apple TV Siri Remote in hand.

Toward the end of the first decade of the 2000s, rumors swirled that Apple had its sights set on making a TV — a proper set, not a streaming device like what the Apple TV has become. Steve Jobs even claimed to have figured out exactly how to add the product to the company's portfolio, but the idea never came to fruition before his untimely passing. In today's Power On newsletter, Mark Gurman said that Apple "may even revisit the idea of making an Apple-branded TV set."

Gurman didn't mention details beyond that. In fact, the mention of the TV set came on the heels of a discussion around Apple's upcoming smart home device. Gurman's phrasing regarding the TV — "something [Apple] is evaluating" — is the key here. Gurman suggests that revisiting an Apple-branded TV might be dependent on the success of upcoming smart home devices, especially since HomeKit has been the least popular and least-supported platform of the three major choices.

Read more
How to cut the cord: quitting cable for streaming services
Roku Pro Series TV

If you're tired of paying too much for a cable subscription that doesn't deliver the shows you want to watch, then it may be time to cut the cord and head for greener pastures with streaming. Unlike the early days of streaming, the most popular streaming services and smart TVs now deliver access to huge amounts of content with VOD libraries, along with great new exclusive movies and shows. Even better, some streaming services also offer live streaming, which means you can still catch every new episode of your favorite shows without being hit with an expensive cable subscription.

Of course, having tons of options doesn't actually make figuring out which streaming service is right for you any easier. After all, Hulu + Live TV is different from Netflix, and when you start considering the options that Amazon Prime Video delivers, things get even trickier. When you throw streaming devices into the mix, it complicates everything even more. Have no fear, as we've got all the details you need to make an informed decision. Let's dig in.
Internet speed and streaming

Read more