Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. Guides
  4. Products

Sony Master Series A9G vs Sony A8G: What’s the difference?

By and

We can’t fault the Sony Master Series A9G. It’s the finest 4K TV we’ve had the pleasure of reviewing. However, it’s not all that different from the cheaper, (slightly) lower-end Sony A8G. But what are these differences — and most importantly, are they worth the additional $1,000-$1,300 Sony is asking for the flagship Sony A9G? Let’s find out.

Recommended Videos

Soundbar? No chance

First up, design. There isn’t a whole lot of difference between the Sony A9G and the Sony A8G in this regard. The latest model comes with a sleeker, slimmer stand that leaves almost no space between the bottom of the television and the surface it is resting on. The bezel surrounding the screen is also a bit thinner and the rear doesn’t protrude quite as much.

Related

All in all, the space reductions are minor details that we wouldn’t even have mentioned if we weren’t in the business of painting as clear and accurate a picture as possible — with the stand being the biggest visual difference. Of course, this is something that’s bound to be controversial as the new design leaves virtually no space for a soundbar to rest beneath the screen when stand-mounted.

Notice how the Sony A9G almost sits flat on the surface? Riley Young/Digital Trends

Also worth mentioning is the addition of an eARC HDMI slot on the Sony Master Series A9G (not to be confused with HDMI 2.1, which neither the A9G or A8G support). We have a full explainer detailing what eARC is and why it’s useful, so we won’t run into it now. In a nutshell, it’s HDMI ARC with the addition of original, full-resolution audio transmission through HDMI.

Kick, punch, thud

Plus, Sony has (marginally) improved its trademark Acoustic Surface tech on the Sony Master Series A9G. For those unaware, this eliminates bulky speakers on the front of the television by sending waves through the screen itself — creating a unique effect of voices and sound effects seemingly coming from their respective locations on the screen (left, right, or center).

The difference with the Sony Master Series A9G is that Acoustic Surface is twice as powerful — on paper, at least. Sony says that three of the four channels have been bumped up from 10W up to 20W. Although, this doesn’t translate to a much better viewing experience. The two televisions sound near-identical, save for the fact the A9G has a little bit more kick to it.

Not a (built-in) speaker in sight. Riley Young/Digital Trends

Let’s face it, though: If you’re splashing out north of $1,000 for a television, you’re going to be hooking it up to at least a soundbar, if not an entire surround sound setup — so the rumble Acoustic Surface makes will go unnoticed. Better yet, the Sony Master Series A9G can be used as a center channel speaker, via a terminal on the rear, whereas the Sony A8G cannot.

Let’s get real deep

The Sony Master Series A9G and Sony Master Series A8G feature the same 4K Ultra HD OLED screen. However, the A9G is equipped with Sony’s leading Sony X1 Ultimate picture processor, versus the Sony X1 Extreme on the more affordable A8G. The main advantage here is that the top-of-the-line version is better at object-based processing, which results in better depth.

Thin. Super thin. Riley Young/Digital Trends

For Dolby Vision fans, the premier Sony A9G is armed with Dolby Vision Day and Dolby Vision Night picture modes. It has Netflix Calibrated Mode, too. By comparison, the Sony A8G is lacking all three of these picture presets. It does share IMAX Enhanced with the A9G, though. But this isn’t a big deal — play around with the picture settings yourself and you can create a more personal effect.

Elegant, but not necessary

Finally, the Sony A9G comes bundled with a slightly more elegant remote control, which functions in the exact same way as the one bundled with the A8G, and souped-up hardware that delivers a smoother Android TV experience. Having said that, while a bit sluggish at times, Android TV is just as functional on the A8G — so don’t consider this reason alone to upgrade.

So, which do you need?

The bottom line is there just isn’t enough of a difference between the Sony Master Series A9G and the Sony A8G to warrant the $1,000 to $1,300 price hike, depending on the screen size you opt for. Sure, if money is no object and you’re insistent on having the best of the best, opt for the Sony A9G. For everyone else, the Sony A8G is definitely the way to go.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Josh Levenson
Josh Levenson
Having spent half a decade writing about the latest AV, mobile and social news for some of the world’s largest…
Projectors vs. TVs: Which is best for your home theater?
ViewSonic X10

If you've got the real estate available in your home, the urge to fill wall space with a TV or projection system can be undeniable, especially if you've been itching to upgrade an old home theater system. These days, you can often throw down less than $1,000 and walk out of Best Buy with the latest and greatest TV hardware, with monster sizes at several different price points. Or, you can opt for a projector and screen to fully maximize your viewing experience. While you may lose things like smart features and decent audio, you'll be getting a much bigger image.

Indeed, both options have their pros and cons, and there are specific scenarios where one would be a better pick over the other. To help you decide which will work best in your own home theater, we've put together this guide comparing projectors and TVs -- detailing how the two differ in terms of price, picture quality, installation, sound quality, and convenience.

Read more
8K TV: Everything you need to know about television’s future
A Samsung 85-inch 8K hangs on a living room wall.

When it comes to the TV resolution wars, nothing can stand in the way of progress. When once the world thought 4K was the be-all, end-all, in came 8K to blow us away yet again. 8K TV models have steadily been arriving in stores and online for the last couple of years -- so it's never too late to start familiarizing yourself with 8K Ultra HD.

In a nutshell, if 4K Ultra HD is four times the resolution of Full HD, then 8K Ultra HD is four times the resolution of 4K Ultra HD and 16 times the resolution of Full HD. But is this a worthwhile addition to your home entertainment setup, and will it replace 4K Ultra HD anytime soon? No, not yet. You're still better off getting yourself a 4K TV, and that tech is still improving every year, too. But it's always good to keep one eye on the future, so let's dig into 8K TV and get prepared.
What is 8K?
If you use basic math, it may seem like 8K would provide double the resolution of 4K, but that isn't the case. Since we're talking two dimensions here -- horizontal lines and vertical lines -- it's actually a whopping 16 times the pixels of HD and four times the pixels of 4K: an 8K resolution screen equates to 7680 x 4320, or 33 million pixels (33,117,600, to be exact), instead of 3840 x 2160 (8,294,400 pixels). To more easily visualize it, imagine four 4K TVs placed in a four-by-four grid. That is a lot of pixels.

Read more
Sony claims mini-LED superiority with 2022 8K and 4K TVs
Sony 2022 Bravia XR TV lineup.

For Sony's TV ambitions, 2022 is looking like a banner year. Not only has it become the first company to bring a QD-OLED TV to market (the Sony A95K), but it is also branching out into mini-LED backlighting for its non-OLED flagship models, the 8K resolution Z9K, and the X95K, a 4K model. And naturally, Sony believes its version of mini-LED is better than the competition, thanks to a new version of its XR Backlight Master Drive and improvements to its Cognitive Processor XR technology.
Better mini-LED?

Why is Sony so confident that its min-LED TVs are better than TCL's mini-LED models, Samsung's Neo QLED TV, and LG's mini-LED QNED models? Apparently, none of these competitors are applying sufficient algorithmic control over their backlights, according to Sony, which results in less-than-ideal picture quality.

Read more