Skip to main content

Sony to Start Selling 3D TVs in June

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Back at January’s Consumer Electronics Show, Sony was one of the major electronics manufacturers jumping on the 3D bandwagon and eager to show off its forthcoming 3D-capable, high-definition gear. Now, the company has said when consumers will actually be able to set hands on the stuff: Sony plans to begin selling its first 3D-capable televisions in Japan this June, with launches in the United States and other markets coming at about the same time.

Sony will start the Japanese market off with 40- and 460-inch versions of its Bravia flat-screen TV on June 10; 52- and 60-inch versions will follow on July 16. The 42-inch 3D-capable television will carry a suggested retail price of about ¥290,000 (roughly $3,200 USD); the 60-inch version will run some ¥580,000 (about $6,400 USD). The televisions will (of course) come with 3D glasses, along with a camera sensor that will adjust audio and picture based on a viewer’s location relative to the screen. Sony also plans to bring two less-expensive 3D televisions to market, but will sell glasses and a camera sensor separately.

Recommended Videos

Sony CEO Howard Stringer says Sony hopes 3D technology will help push the company’s television and gaming businesses into profitability this year; the company hopes to sell as many as 2.5 million 3D-capable televisions during its next fiscal year. Sony also plans to bring 3D capability to the PlayStation 3 via a firmware upgrade by mid-2010, meaning the company will be able to offer a complete 3D entertainment experience—3D televisions, Blu-ray players, and gaming—from a single vendor. Sony hopes that will give it an edge over the likes of Samsung and Panasonic, which are also moving to bring 3D-capable televisions to market quickly.

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
3D is readying for another comeback — and this time it’s personal
The Apple Vision Pro reveals the wearer's eyes on a front-facing display.

It's not a stretch to say that 3D has reinvented itself more times than Taylor Swift. Unlike Swift, whose musical migrations only seem to add to her famously loyal fan base, 3D has suffered from an inability to make itself something that people actually want in their lives.

And though we’ve literally seen this movie before, 3D appears to be trying for relevance once again. Only this time, things might be different. Instead of trying to emulate a movie theater experience, 3D is getting personal, thanks to a little help from Apple and new glasses-free technology. This time, it might stick.
The rise and fall of 3D TV

Read more
You Asked: TVs over fireplaces, Sonos vs. Wi-Fi smart speakers, and 3D TVs
You Asked Ep 17 Feature

In this installment of You Asked: TVs over the fireplace — yay or nay? Sonos versus Amazon, Google, and Apple speakers. And will 3D TVs ever make a comeback?

TVs over fireplaces

Read more
Samsung, Google are attacking Dolby Atmos’ monopoly on 3D sound, and it’s going to get ugly
Dolby Atmos Under attack.

When you think of immersive, 3D sound for movies and music, one name usually comes to mind: Dolby Atmos. Despite the existence of competing surround sound formats and technologies,like DTS:X, MPEG-H, Sony 360 Reality Audio, and Auro3D, they barely register when compared to the juggernaut that is Dolby Atmos. With strong (and growing) support from movie studios, music labels, streaming services, game consoles, smartphones, and audio equipment makers, there’s little doubt that Dolby Atmos and Dolby Atmos Music have become the de facto 3D sound standards.

And yet, if Google and Samsung get their way, Dolby Atmos’ reign as the king of immersive audio might be about to meet its biggest challenge to date. Together, the two tech giants have been quietly working on an open-source and royalty-free 3D sound format known by the awkward name Immersive Audio Model and Formats. But if history has taught us anything, it’s that format wars are rarely fought for the benefit of the public. And even a free version of Atmos that’s every bit as good as the original could face harrowing barriers to adoption.
Why do we need another Dolby Atmos?

Read more