Skip to main content

6 wearable gadgets that were ahead of their time (and not long for this world)

Wearable technology might seem like a distinctly 21st century innovation, but we’ve been augmenting ourselves with tech long before Google dreamed up Android Wear.

You could apply the broadest definition of wearable technology to technology dating all the way back to the 17th century, when humans first starting wearing time-keeping objects. We get a tad closer to our current parameters around the early 1800s, when spring-controlled pocket watches first began appearing on the scene.

The thing looks like Google Glass, if it had been designed by your eight-year-old nephew.

Around the 1920s, digital mechanical pocket watches began appearing, and about half a century later, the world was introduced to the Pulsar watch, the first entirely electronic wristwatch with a digital display. Anyone over the age of 25 will likely have at least some faint memory of the strangely exciting run of calculator watches, kicked off by Casio in the mid-80s. And there’s the Sony Walkman, which, given the right parameters could be considered the first real runaway success in the world of wearable technology, with 385 million units sold worldwide at last count.

But not every piece of archaic wearable tech went over like a pocket watch or Walkman. Along the way, there were also some real duds — products that certainly had their heart in the right place, but weren’t long for this world, due to price, poor implementation, unpolished technology, bad marketing or some combination thereof. Fortunately, we still remember them.

Hewlett-Packard HP-01, 1977

This one’s been making the rounds quite a bit lately, thanks to HP recently announcing a new luxury smart watch, to sell through online retailer Gilt. The tech-blogging community was more than happy to point out that the product wouldn’t be the company’s first dip in the smartwatch waters —because, really, what’s smarter than a calculator? The aptly named HP-01 debuted the same year as Elvis Costello and Fantasy Island. In addition to being the world’s most fashionable tip calculator, the HP-01’s concave buttons required a stylus before they were cool, uncool and then cool again. And with a price of between $2,500 to $3,300 in today’s money, it was the perfect way to calculate how little money you had left in your bank account after the extravagant purchase. While the product was discontinued by the end of the decade, we’re glad to see HP getting back on that horse. If the company’s still looking for the perfect name, might we suggest the HP-02?

Keith Taft’s George Blackjack Shoe Computer, 1972

All right, so this one’s a bit of a cheat, but honestly, it’s too good not to mention. The lengths at to which Keith Taft went to in order to gain a competitive advantage is the stuff of legend, building an extremely early example of a networked microcomputer he fit in a pair of modified shoes to help him count cards. The device, affectionately named “George” was fairly massive by today’s standards at 15 pounds, but there’s something to be said for applying the same sort of single-focused drive that got us to the moon to something like blackjack.

Seiko TV Watch, 1982

Seiko’s simply named TV Watch certainly didn’t fail from lack of hype. The wrist-worn device popped up in the 1983 Bond flick Octopus and secured a spot in the following year’s Guinness Book of World Records under the “world’s smallest TV”category. The promise of an early 80s wrist TV was, naturally, too good to be true on a number of accounts. For starters, the watch needed to be to tethered to a receiver several times its size, meant to be carried in a shirt pocket. Then there’s the price —around $1,331 in today’s dollars. But hey, you also got AM/FM radio for that price. Bond-verse and eBay aside, the TV Watch ultimately never made it outside of Japan.

Reflection Technology Private Eye, 1989

Released in 1989, the Private Eye offered a computer monitor away from the prying eyes of others by mounting a bulky 1.25-inch monochrome screen to a pair of glasses. The device promised to deliver a similar experience to that of looking at a 15-inch monitor at 18-inches away —and a little added neck strain, no doubt. The product’s display would ultimately find some popularity with universities and hackers, who adapted the product to their own needs.

Xybernaut Poma, 2002

Named Wearable Internet Appliance when Hitachi first unveiled the product in 2001, this head-worn device debuted in the US with the decidedly less dishwasher-like name Poma. Granted, it seemed like a good idea at the time, but in retrospect, the thing looks like Google Glass, if it had been designed by your eight-year-old nephew. Designed to work with Microsoft products like Word, Outlook and IE, the $1,500 Windows CE-running device was large, unwieldy and came with a bunch of tethered peripherals.

MSN Direct Smart Watches, 2004

You know we’re getting closer to the current batch of devices once the term “smart watches”is bandied about. When Microsoft’s MSN Direct Smart Watches were first unveiled at CES 2004, there was plenty to be excited about in those heady pre-iPhone days. They synced emails, delivered news, sports, weather and such through SPOT FM technology, and charged up wirelessly. Sadly, the SPOT got off to a bumpy start, and was soon be eclipsed by cellular broadband. Microsoft ultimately discontinued the line in 2008 and shut down SPOT altogether in 2011.

Brian Heater
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brian Heater has worked at number of tech pubs, including Engadget, PCMag and Laptop. His writing has appeared in Spin…
These 3 gadgets prove wearable tech reached its peak in 2024
The Ray-Ban Meta smartglasses, Apple Watch Series 10, and Oura Ring 4 on a table.

What a great year for wearables 2024 has been. Don’t believe me? We’ve had three standout products this year. One has individually broken new ground, an established product line has been refined so it’s close to perfect, and another has driven other brands to muscle in on its success.

Let's talk about each one in turn, why they all complement each other really well, and how there has never been a better time for wearables.
Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses

Read more
I finally have RCS on my iPhone, and it’s one of my favorite iOS 18 features
An iPhone 16 Pro showing RCS messaging.

Apple’s Messages app has certainly come a long way. When the first iPhone launched in 2007, it could only send SMS -- there weren't even picture messages. Then it got MMS protocol support in iPhone OS 3.0 with the iPhone 3GS. With iPhone OS 5.0, Apple implemented its own iMessage chat protocol, making it easy for Apple users to communicate with other Apple device users.

However, when it came to messaging Android users, Apple dragged its feet for the longest time, sticking with SMS and MMS, which aren’t encrypted and don't offer full-quality photo and video sending. It also sparked the whole blue bubble versus green bubble war.

Read more
The 2025 Android phone I’m most looking forward to isn’t from Samsung or Google
The OnePlus logo on the back of the OnePlus 12R.

2025 is rapidly approaching, and that can only mean one thing for a tech nerd like me: It's time to start looking forward to another year of smartphones. All signs are pointing to an interesting year for Apple with the iPhone 17, and I'm eager to see what comes of it.

But what about what's happening in the Android smartphone space? The Samsung Galaxy S25 series is just on the horizon, but I've yet to see anything that's made me really ecstatic about it. The Google Pixel 10 series should be a good one, but we've not heard enough about it yet.

Read more