Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

AMOLED vs LCD: Which screen is best for your phone?

amoled vs lcd which screen is best for your phone smartphone1
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Buying a phone is becoming harder and harder these days. There are so many different options on smartphones that it is hard to keep up with all the latest technology. With phones and tablets almost completely relying on touchscreen interfaces, the screens on these devices are easily the most important part of modern day devices. There are several different technologies behind these screens, and we aim to explain what some of these terms mean. If you’ve ever wondered what AMOLED, LCD, IPS, or TFT mean, you’re reading the right article.

These days you really only have two choices of screens when you are buying a smartphone or tablet: LCD or AMOLED. Many of you probably can’t tell the difference between the two screen types, but both technologies have inherent strengths and weaknesses. LCD has been around for a while, but AMOLED phones are gaining popularity thanks to Samsung and other manufacturers. There isn’t a clear winner at this point in time, so here’s a look at both.

Update: This article was originally published on June 18, 2012, and updated on Aug. 25, 2014, to reflect recent devices. DT writer Aaron Liu contributed to this article.

LCD

Recommended Videos

LCD, Liquid Crystal Display, has been a part of our lives for years now. Besides mobile devices, we see LCD screens being used with almost every computer monitor, and in the majority of TVs. While these screens are made of wondrous liquid crystals, they also require a couple panes of glass, and a light source. LCD screens produce some of the most realistic colors you can find on a screen, but might not offer as wide of a contrast ratio (darker darks and brighter brights) as an AMOLED screen.

LCD Screen
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Some common terms you will find associated with LCD displays are TFT and IPS. TFT stands for Thin Film Transistor, which makes the wiring of LCD screens more efficient by reducing the number of electrodes per pixel. One benefit of TFT displays is an improved image quality over standard LCD screens. Another popular LCD technology is In-Plane Switching, or IPS, which improves upon TFT by offering much wider viewing angles and color reproduction on LCD screens. IPS screens are able to achieve this by keeping all the liquid crystals parallel to the screen. IPS is generally preferable to standard TFT.

Notable Devices with LCD Screens: iPhone 5 and 5s, LG G3, Sony Xperia 2, Google Nexus 5.

AMOLED

AMOLED, Active Matrix Organic Light Emitting Diode, technology has grown in popularity in recent years, particularly among Samsung products. AMOLED screens consist of a thin layer of organic polymers that light up when zapped with an electric current. Due to this simple construction, AMOLED screens can be extremely thin and do not require a backlight. The benefit of losing a backlight is readily apparent: these screens are able to produce blacks so deep that the screen pixels can shut right off. Shutting off pixels can also save electricity and battery life in phones and tablets. Just keep your backgrounds close to black and you’ll save energy.

AMOLED Screen
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sometimes when you read about AMOLED screens, you might hear people complaining about something called a “pentile” display. This is a feature of most color AMOLED screens. Instead of having just a single red, blue, and green sub pixel per actual pixel, pentile displays have a RGBG sub pixel layout which has two green sub pixels for each red and blue. The positive of this technology is that you are able to create a screen that is just as bright as normal screens with one third the amount of sub pixels. The negative of pentile screens is that they can appear grainy, or appear to be lower resolution due to the larger, more visible sub pixels. For a while, Samsung begun using a display type called Super AMOLED Plus, which does not use a pentile sub pixel layout and also improves viewability in direct sunlight — traditionally a weakness for AMOLED. Samsung equipped the Galaxy S II with a Super AMOLED plus screen, but then reverted back to Super AMOLED screens for the Galaxy S III, citing screen life as the reason for the switch.

Notable Devices with AMOLED screens: Samsung Galaxy S series, Nokia Lumia 900, HTC One S.

You be the judge

Samsung Galaxy S3 and HTC One X -- LCD vs AMOLED comparison
Can you tell which is AMOLED or LCD? Image used with permission by copyright holder

There are pros and cons for each type of screen, and both screen technologies can produce vivid, beautiful displays. The only way to know for sure if the screen on your future device will satisfy you is to try it out for yourself. You will be able to easily see if the screen viewing angles, contrast ratio, and color reproduction will fit your needs after using the phone for just a few minutes.

Related: LCD vs. Plasma TVsLED vs. LCD TVs, and 1080p vs. 1080i.

Mike Dunn
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Mike graduated from University of Arizona with a degree in poetry, and made his big break by writing love sonnets to the…
YouTube Music vs. Spotify: So alike, but which is best for you?
An iPhone with the YouTube Music app on it.

Choosing the right music streaming service can feel overwhelming given the many options vying for your attention. Spotify and YouTube Music are two of the biggest players, boasting massive libraries of over 100 million songs each and offering similar plans, from free ad-supported versions to premium tiers with extra perks. But which one comes out on top?

Spotify has earned its place as the world's most popular music streaming service, and for good reason. It provides a polished user experience, boasts a vast music catalog, and offers additional content like podcasts and audiobooks. Spotify also edges out YouTube Music in regard to audio quality by delivering a slightly richer listening experience, although neither have yet to offer their music streams in hi-resolution or lossless quality.
YouTube Music, on the other hand, is deeply integrated with Google's ecosystem. This is a major advantage for users already invested in Google services, as it allows for seamless transitions between apps and devices. Imagine effortlessly switching from listening to music on your phone to your Google Home speaker. Plus, YouTube Music leverages its video platform to offer a unique advantage: access to music videos, live performances, and rare remixes you won't find anywhere else.
While Spotify might seem the obvious choice, YouTube Music offers compelling features that make it a serious contender. To make the best decision for your needs, it's crucial to delve deeper into each platform's specifics while considering factors like music discovery features, user interface, social sharing capabilities, and offline listening options.

Read more
The best Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max screen protectors for 2024
Someone holding the iPhone 16 Pro.

The iPhone 16 series is one of the hottest phones on the market right now, but despite the advances in durability and design, these phones are still vulnerable to one thing: drops. Even a short drop can shatter a screen or dent the side of the chassis, especially if it lands the wrong way. Picking up an iPhone 16 case is a always a good idea, even if you normally skip cases.

Regardless of whether you pick up a case or not, should buy one of the best Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max screen protectors. A broken screen will set you back roughly $379, and that's the last thing you want when you've dropped at least $1,200 on a new phone. The good news is there are tons of screen protectors available with varying levels of cost and protection. Even an inexpensive screen protector can guard against scratches or cracks, and it's a lot easier to replace a screen protector than a screen.

Read more
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6: Which is the best foldable?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold next to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6.

This Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold battle pits a sixth-generation device against a second-gen device -- and the winner would seem obvious. After all, a company should have an edge if it has been building foldables for six years while the other phone manufacturer is only two years in.

But it’s not that simple, as these two are the exact opposite in terms of generational upgrades. While Samsung pushed out an iterative upgrade, Google went back to the design board and changed the foldable’s form factor. Google seems to have already perfected its design language with the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, whereas Samsung’s complacency this year makes it look like it's falling behind in the foldable phone segment. However, it's not a complete slam dunk for Google, as the Korean company added a bunch of meaningful upgrades over the Galaxy Z Fold 5. So, which should you buy?

Read more