Skip to main content

Read ebooks? You may be about to receive a payment from Apple

apple ebook settlement ibooks ios
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Buy an ebook from Apple, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or Kobo between April 1, 2010 and May 21, 2012?

In that case, a credit or check could be on its way to you soon. Apple’s payout to U.S. customers marks the final stage of the long-running ebook price-fixing dispute that ultimately forced the tech giant into a $450 million settlement.

Recommended Videos

Starting June 21, millions of ebook buyers will begin receiving payments in the form of credits and checks for losses incurred as a result of an alleged price-fixing scheme involving Apple and a number of publishers, namely Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin, and Simon and Schuster.

If you’re one of the affected customers, you can expect to receive a $6.93 credit for every ebook you bought that was listed as a New York Times bestseller, and a $1.57 credit for all other ebooks.

Attorneys are describing the refund process as “uniquely simple,” with payouts sent automatically to consumers’ accounts at major ebook retailers, including Apple, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Kobo.

Recipients can also expect to receive an email direct from the relevant retailer informing them that their account has been credited.

So who’ll receive a check and who’ll get a credit? According to law firm Hagens Berman, who litigated the case with the Department of Justice, “If ebook purchasers requested a check in lieu of a credit, they will receive a check. If purchasers received a credit during the first round of distribution of publisher settlements, and they did not opt out, they will automatically receive a credit.”

Hagens Berman described the settlement, which sees $400 million shared between affected customers, as “one of the most successful recovery of damages in any antitrust lawsuit in the country.”

As for the remaining $50 million, $30 million will go toward covering legal fees and $20 million will be shared among the 33 states involved in the lawsuit.

Apple was first accused of fixing ebook prices back in 2010, with the class-action suit that led to this month’s payout launching two years later.

The plaintiffs alleged that Apple illegally colluded with publishing companies to control the ebook market by artificially raising the price of ebooks, lowering competition, and charging consumers higher prices.

While the publishers settled several years ago, Apple continued to fight the suit until March when its final appeal was rejected by the Supreme Court.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Why the lawsuit against Apple’s AirTags may be bigger than you realize
Nomad Apple TV Siri Remote Case with an AirTag installed.

Apple is facing yet another lawsuit, but this one could very well define the future of AirTags. Two women who were victims of stalking using AirTags have filed a class-action lawsuit against Apple in a district court in Northern California. The plaintiffs cite incidents where former partners hid AirTags in a car wheel and a child’s backpack to track their whereabouts and harass them. 
The ordeal is harrowing, but it’s not the first of its kind. Ever since AirTags went on sale, reports of stalking and using them to steal cars have been all over the internet. But this time, Apple has been dragged to court over a rather comprehensive set of charges.

Accusing Apple of gross negligence, the plaintiffs allege that the company rushed out a product without proper safeguards. 
The design has also been lambasted as the trackers didn’t perform as expected, even though Apple claimed the AirTags are “stalker-proof.” The lawsuit mentions that “AirTag’s design defect was a substantial factor” in causing harm. To recall, AirTags weren’t initially loud enough, and after being flagged, Apple decided to bump up their sonic warning capability. 

Read more
I have a confession — I may have been wrong about the Apple Watch Ultra
Apple Watch Ultra with Wayfinder watch face on a mans wrist.

I’ve been wearing the Apple Watch Ultra for a few days, and I haven’t been near a mountain, a desolate trail, or deep under the water. When I first saw the Watch Ultra, I pondered that you may have to do these things in order to then casually wear the smartwatch without looking a bit silly. Now that the Watch Ultra is on my wrist, I think I may have been wrong about it. After all, even Indiana Jones had to spend time in the classroom. Here's what has started to change my mind.
It’s not big if you’re used to big watches
The size of the Apple Watch Ultra has been one of the major talking points since its announcement. The official dimensions put it at 49mm tall, 44mm wide, and 14.4mm thick — while the largest Apple Watch Series 8 is 44mm tall, 38mm wide, and 10.7mm thick. The Series 8 is also half the weight at 32 grams compared to the Ultra’s 61 grams. Is it unmanageable? An inconveniently big and heavy piece of tech strapped to your wrist?

The answer depends on where you’re coming from. If you’ve worn almost any Casio G-Shock watch recently, the Apple Watch Ultra won’t feel that big at all. Next to my G-Shock MTG-B1000, it looks about the same size. It actually looks a little smaller next to the GA-735, and even smaller again next to the GR-B200 Gravitymaster. For reference, the Gravitymaster’s dimensions are 63mm tall, 54mm wide, and 18mm thick. That’s a big watch. Divers probably won’t find it too big either, as it takes up a similar amount of space on my wrist as the Seiko SBBN033 Marinemaster diver’s watch with its 47mm case.

Read more
Apple’s Ceramic Shield may change your mind about an iPhone 14 screen protector
iPhone 13 Pro side view.

Just how much do you need a screen protector on your new iPhone 14? Screen protectors are like cases — we don’t always want to buy and use them but feel we should protect our investment from harm. But with that comes the expense, the awkwardness of fitting the things, and sometimes a change in the feel of the glass under our finger.

The iPhone 14 Pro uses a special type of protective glass Apple calls Ceramic Shield, which it says offers scratch resistance and four times the drop protection versus iPhone models without the special glass. Is there any point in fitting a screen protector to it, and if you don’t, what will your phone look like after a year? That’s what we’ve found out.
What is Ceramic Shield?
Ceramic Shield glass was introduced on the iPhone 12 series, was used on the iPhone 13 series, and is fitted to the new iPhone 14 models, too. It doesn’t matter whether you buy a regular iPhone 14, the iPhone 14 Pro, or the iPhone 14 Pro Max — it has Apple’s Ceramic Shield glass on the front. Like the familiar Gorilla Glass fitted on many Android devices, Apple’s Ceramic Shield has also been developed by experts at Corning.

Read more