Skip to main content

Federal appeals court charges Apple $450M fine for fixing ebook prices

apple ebookpricing supreme court case ibooks
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Apple’s ebook price-fixing saga has finally come to a quiet close, it seems. A federal appeals court ruled 2-1 against the company this morning, affirming the finding of U.S. District Judge Denis Cote that the Cupertino-based company illegally colluded with publishers to prop up the prices of digital books.

“Apple orchestrated a conspiracy among the publishers to raise ebook prices.”

Recommended Videos

“We conclude that the district court correctly decided that Apple orchestrated a conspiracy among the publishers to raise ebook prices,” wrote Second Circuit Judge Debra Ann Livingston in today’s decision.

It’s the outcome of charges brought by the Justice Department three years ago, which alleged that Apple organized an ebook pricing scheme, a violation of federal antitrust law. The company fought the litigation intensely, denying wrongdoing and “refusing to settle unlike the publishers with whom it allegedly colluded,” the Wall Street Journal reports.

The Justice Department’s lawsuit, which 33 states went on to join, was filed in 2012 after evidence arose that Apple willfully influenced the ebook market. The company led the charge to supplant the wholesale model for ebooks, which before the introduction of its iBooks store was the industry standard, with an agency model that granted publishers the right to dictate prices. Under the terms of a collective agreement with Hachette, Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins, Penguin, and Macmillan, Apple received a larger cut of sales in return.

The arrangement was mutually beneficial. Apple was able to quickly fill its newly-launched ebooks storefront, and publishers were given leverage against Amazon, which came to command between 80 and 90 percent of all ebooks sales in 2010 through aggressive pricing. Under the agency model, ebook prices quickly rose.

Despite today’s decision, Apple isn’t entirely without recourse — it could petition the Supreme Court or ask the Second Circuit to rehear the case. But the Wall Street Journal reports that the company’s expected to pay $450 million — most of it to customers of its iBooks store — as part of an agreement made with the Justice Department and plaintiffs in November.

“Apple did not conspire to fix ebook pricing and this ruling does nothing to change the facts. We are disappointed the Court does not recognize the innovation and choice the iBooks Store brought for consumers,” Apple said in a statement. “While we want to put this behind us, the case is about principles and values. We know we did nothing wrong in 2010 and are assessing next steps.”

Those sound like fighting words, but should Apple finally decide to pony up, it wouldn’t hurt the company’s bottom line too severely. As the Wall Street Journal notes, the proposed settlement amounts to less than 3 percent of Apple’s 2014 fourth quarter revenue.

Kyle Wiggers
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kyle Wiggers is a writer, Web designer, and podcaster with an acute interest in all things tech. When not reviewing gadgets…
See Motorola’s latest updates to its rollable phone concept
Motorola Rizr bottom.

Motorola is refining the exciting Rizr concept smartphone shown during Mobile World Congress (MWC) earlier this year, according to a patent filed in the U.S. in November. In case you missed it, the Rizr is a continuation of its popular Razr folding smartphones, but this timewith a motorized rollable screen that retracts and extends to increase the viewing area, or minimize the size of the phone.

The patent addresses how we may eventually unlock the phone using a fingerprint sensor. When the phone’s screen is raised or retracted, a single fixed-position, in-display fingerprint sensor wouldn’t always work, so Motorola is experimenting with multiple fingerprint sensors and a larger activation area to solve the problem.

Read more
I took four of the best phones to NYC for a wild camera test. Here are the results
close up photo of cameras on the iPhone 16 Pro, Galaxy S24 Ultra, OnePlus 12 and Pixel 9 Pro

If you’re in the U.S. and looking for a smartphone camera that won’t let you down, there’s a strong chance that you’ll land on a phone from one of four phone makers: Samsung, Google, OnePlus, or Apple.

The Galaxy S24 Ultra is widely regarded as having the best smartphone telephoto lens in the U.S., thanks to its 10x zoom. Google continues to work wonders with the triple camera array in its Pixel 9 Pro, while the OnePlus 12 offers outstanding performance at a more affordable price. Then there’s the iPhone 16 Pro, with its 5x telephoto camera, which was exclusive to the iPhone 15 Pro Max last year.

Read more
Boost Mobile’s 5G network is becoming a real threat to other carriers
Boost Mobile store.

Boost Mobile has always been seen as a smaller phone service provider, but the trade-off of that is the lower prices it offers. The company has now announced major upgrades to its growing 5G network.

Previously, Boost Mobile operated as an MVNO (or mobile virtual network operator). In other words, Boost didn't have its own towers — it sort of piggybacked off the towers of other networks.

Read more