Skip to main content

Apple wants to know how the FBI cracked the San Bernadino iPhone

apple new york iphone doj passcode
Image used with permission by copyright holder
While the United States Department of Justice may have withdrawn its request to have Apple create new code for the FBI to access the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone, the encryption debate is far from over.

There’s a similar, unrelated case in New York revolving around an individual in Brooklyn, who was indicted on charges of meth trafficking. Even though he has already pleaded guilty, law enforcement want to access his iPhone to possibly obtain more information. But just like in the San Bernardino case, Apple refused to create such access that could tarnish the encrypted security on iOS.

Recommended Videos

The FBI claims to have gotten access into the San Bernardino iPhone, thanks to a third-party that provided a method. Apple may now use the result from the California case to its advantage, to find out how exactly the FBI hacked the iPhone in the New York case, according to sources that spoke to Reuters.

Apple told Reuters “we don’t know” what the FBI’s solution was, which third-party assisted them, and “what it allegedly achieves.”

A court filing on March 29 shows that the court agreed to push Apple’s next response on or before April 11, and the government can respond on or before April 22. However, the government has until April 11 to decide whether it wants to “modify” its bid to force Apple to access the Brooklyn iPhone.

“The government further agrees to update the Court by April 11, 2016, as to whether it intends to modify its application in this matter,” U.S. Attorney Robert L. Capers said in the brief.

Apple had filed a motion to delay the proceedings in the New York case, to see if the government would be able to crack the San Bernardino iPhone. Seeing as it did, the company wants the FBI to use the same method for the New York case, and also wants to find out which method was used.

“For example, if that same method can be used to unlock the iPhone in this case, it would eliminate the need for Apple’s assistance,” Apple said in its previous filing. “On the other hand, if the DOJ claims that the method will not work on the iPhone here, Apple will seek to test that claim, as well as any claims by the government that other methods cannot be used.”

Expect to hear if the Department of Justice will pursue the New York case within the next two weeks.

Julian Chokkattu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Julian is the mobile and wearables editor at Digital Trends, covering smartphones, fitness trackers, smartwatches, and more…
Apple might discontinue its most ‘courageous’ iPhone accessory
Apple's Lightning to 3.5mm headphone adapter.

Apple introduced the iPhone 7 in 2016. The phone is noted for being the first Apple handset to ship without a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack — something Apple infamously praised as a move that took "courage."

At a time when most wired headphones needed one of those jacks to listen to music, Apple had an interesting solution: a Lightning to 3.5mm headphone jack adapter that shipped with every new phone. According to MacRumors, Apple is set to end production on that accessory.

Read more
It’s the end of the road for these two iPhone models
Apple iPhone 6S Plus

Seeing your favorite handheld gaming device in a retro store has a unique way of making you feel old, but Apple might have topped it. According to the company, the iPhone XS Max and iPhone 6s Plus are now "vintage." They join the ranks of the iPhone 4 and even the iPad Pro 12.9-inch model.

It's not wholly unexpected. Apple declares a device vintage after five years, and that means it becomes more difficult to have that device repaired or to find replacement parts for it. Obsolete is applied to products that are more than seven years old, but sometimes certain variants get that label early.

Read more
I bought an Apple Watch Series 10, and I’m surprised by how much I love it
The Apple Watch Series 10 sitting on top of a green bush.

There’s little doubt that the Apple Watch has become one of the most popular wearables. While it wasn’t the first smartwatch on the market by a long shot, Apple’s wearable seemed to find its stride more quickly than many of its rivals.

That’s not to say that the competition isn’t heating up. This year’s Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch Ultra are worthy contenders thanks to improved performance and new health features. Nevertheless, the Apple Watch has had a cozy lead, erven though it sometimes feels like Apple is coasting by adding only iterative improvements each year.

Read more