Apple Nixed Multi-touch in Android?

By Nick Mokey Published February 11, 2009

Apple Nixed Multi-touch in Android?

When a hacker is able to enable multi-touch capabilities on T-Mobile’s Android-powered G1, you have to wonder how Google engineers couldn’t figure it out. As it turns out, they could – but the booming voice of a fruit told them not to.

According to an anonymous Android team member cited by VentureBeat, the Android team was well-aware how to enable multi-touch, but opted to leave it out by request from Apple. Unfortunately, neither the source nor VentureBeat specified whether Apple’s “asking” came in the form of a friendly request for a favor, or a thinly veiled legal threat.

Recommended Videos

Given how closely Google and Apple have worked together in the past (witness: Google maps integration on the iPhone and Google as the default search engine for the phone,) it isn’t out of the question that Google axed multi-touch voluntarily. But given rumblings of a patent war between Palm and Apple over multi-touch on the Pre, it’s clear that legal issues may have loomed over the decision, as well. And VB’s source is apparently glad they left it out for that reason.

Both Dell and HP have produced multi-touch enabled notebooks, but no company has yet released a multi-touch-enabled phone similar to the iPhone. Palm’s anticipated release of the Pre later this year will likely be the first challenger, either leading the way for others or proving that Apple’s patents will make things difficult.

Editor in Chief

As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…

Mobile

Is your child safe from inappropriate apps on Apple App Store? A report says no

App Store screenshot on iPhone.

Apps aimed at children have been available since the inception of the App Store. However, not all apps created for minors are safe to use. This is the main finding of a new survey conducted by two child safety organizations. The report presents the results of a 24-hour research study in which 800 apps were reviewed, and the findings are concerning.

The Heat Initiative and ParentsTogether Action study found that Apple's App Store is a mass distributor of risky and inappropriate apps to children. Many apps have features that put children at risk of sexual abuse and exploitation, low self-esteem and poor body image, disordered eating, exposure to sexual and violent content, and more. Apple claims that the App Store is a safe place for children, but the study found that Apple takes no legal responsibility for the veracity of age ratings.

Mobile

An Apple insider says a new iPad is coming in spring 2025. Here’s what we know

Someone holding the iPad (2022) with the display turned on.

Apple did not release any new iPads in 2023. However, this year marked a significant change with the introduction of all-new versions of the iPad mini, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Notably absent from this list is the standard iPad, which hasn't been updated in nearly three years. This is expected to change in the coming months. According to MacRumors, Apple plans to release an updated iPad alongside the iPhone SE 4 in spring 2025.

While limited information about the upcoming iPad is available, several details have emerged in recent months. According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, the new tablet is expected to support Apple Intelligence, just like all iPads released in 2024 do. This support suggests that the 11th-generation iPad will likely have a newer A-series chip and at least 8GB of RAM.

Mobile

Google proposes big changes for the future of Search and Android apps

Google Chrome on an Android phone.

Google’s ongoing antitrust tussle spawned a list of sweeping policy suggestions — including a proposed sale of the Chrome business — by the Department of Justice. The focus of the lawsuit centers on the Search monopoly, but it has serious ramifications for Android and the overall browser situation.

Now, Google has shared its own “remedies proposal” to the DOJ’s recommendations, which it claims are going “far beyond what the Court’s decision is actually about.”