Skip to main content

Clearwire wins first round in Sony Ericsson trademark fight

WiMax operator Clearwire has won the first round in what might prove to be a protracted battle with Sony Ericsson over its latest company logo: a Federal judge has denied Sony Ericsson’s request for an immediate injunction barring use of the logo, which means Clearwire can continue using it while the case proceeds.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

“Clearwire is pleased with the federal court’s decision to deny Sony Ericsson’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the use of the Clear marks at issue in the case,” the company wrote in a statement distributed via email. “We expect that the final disposition of the case will be in our favor and that it will demonstrate that the Clear branding is clearly differentiated from the Sony Ericsson brand.”

Recommended Videos

The federal court denied the ruling for a preliminary injunction, finding Sony Ericsson had failed to demonstrate that Clearwire’s logo was sufficiently similar to Sony Ericsson’s to introduce consumer confusion and cause irreparable harm to the Sony Ericsson brand.

Although the ruling for a preliminary injunction is, in theory, just the start of a trademark dispute case, industry watchers don’t expect the tiff between Clearwire and Sony Ericsson to escalate much from here: if Sony Ericsson can’t prove the logo being in the market now is damaging their brand, they won’t have much leverage to encourage Clearwire to change their trademark or come to some sort of settlement agreement. And Clearwire has other branding issues to face, as the company struggles to come up with money to continue building out its WiMax network—and potentially considers shifting away from the retail business entirely to focus on offering wholesale WiMax services to others.

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
What do IP ratings mean? Waterproof ratings explained

Most flagship phones these days boast some level of water resistance, and you'll find "IP ratings" on everything from the Apple iPhone 16 to the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. But that got us wondering: Just what do manufacturers mean when they use terms like "waterproof" and "water-resistant?" What constitutes a "rugged" device? Just how many times can you drop your phone in the toilet before you can expect it to bite the dust?

As it turns out, some terms that describe a phone's ruggedness are actually standardized, and there's a whole lot more to them than meets the eye. IP ratings measure a device's resistance to water, dust, and other particles, while military specs describe structural integrity. Some certifications are a little less precise than others, but taken together, they give a rough idea of how the best waterproof smartphones will hold up against the elements.

Read more
Amazon Kindle (2024) vs. Kindle (2022): Should you upgrade?
Matcha Kindle (2024) (left) and a black Kindle (2022).

If you enjoy reading, then you probably have an e-reader, such as an Amazon Kindle. Those who just need a basic e-reader are likely to be checking out the base model Kindle, and Amazon just updated the lineup with fresh models.

So how is the new Kindle (2024), especially if you already have the Kindle (2022)? Let’s break it down.

Read more
I already damaged my Apple Watch Series 10
i already damaged my apple watch series 10 dt 1

I don’t think I’m clumsy, but I swing my arms a lot and still grimace every time a smartwatch on my wrist hits an immovable object. Yet, for all this movement, I’ve never managed to deeply scratch or lightly crack an Apple Watch display … until now.

The Apple Watch Series 10 doesn’t have many compromises over the Apple Watch Ultra 2, and I even made the switch permanently before this happened. It’s big, thin, and beautiful, but the Apple Watch Series 10 also uses a less durable protective shield for its display.

Read more