Skip to main content

FCC chairman Tom Wheeler is relieved Sprint and T-Mobile aren’t merging

net neutrality timeline fcc tom wheeler 2
Energy Commerce/Flickr
After months of reports suggesting Sprint would merge with T-Mobile, the Kansas City carrier supposedly decided to not go through with the deal. While Sprint and parent company SoftBank are likely unhappy about the whole affair, the opposite is true of FCC chairman Tom Wheeler, based on a brief statement the FCC released.

Related: Sprint replaces CEO as T-Mobile merger plans reportedly fall apart

Recommended Videos

In the statement, Wheeler expressed satisfaction that there will still be four major wireless carriers in the United States. With that said, Wheeler also advised Sprint to use this opportunity to improve its offerings in order to better compete with T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon.

“Four national wireless providers are good for American consumers,” said Wheeler. “Sprint now has the opportunity to focus [its] efforts on robust competition.” Sprint’s first big opportunity to do so would likely be next year, when it will have the opportunity to bid on spectrum in the 600MHz band.

While Sprint’s merger with T-Mobile seems like it’s dead, the decision to cancel the deal reportedly has nothing to do with French telecommunications firm Iliad’s $15 billion bid on T-Mobile, though both companies are currently in talks to find a way forward. As for Sprint, it will likely continue to focus on expanding its Spark service for the short term.

Related: Net neutrality is under threat from the FCC: what it is and how we got here

Meanwhile, the FCC already has its hands full with the topic of net neutrality. Recently, President Obama went on the offensive at a summit, saying that his administration doesn’t support the idea of Internet fast lanes, something the FCC proposed back in May.

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
A new FCC rule could make your phone carrier way less annoying
Someone holding an iPhone 15 Pro Max outside on a patio, showing the back of the Natural Titanium color.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed a new rule that could eliminate one of the most frustrating aspects of smartphone ownership: carrier locking. FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel wants to require mobile providers to unlock customers’ mobile phones within 60 days of activation, making it easier for consumers to switch providers.

The proposal, which will be discussed at the commission’s July 18 meeting, aims to help consumers by establishing universal unlocking requirements for mobile service providers. Carrier locking serves two purposes: deterring theft and encouraging customer retention, as a locked phone cannot be connected to another carrier.

Read more
T-Mobile is getting rid of its misleading ‘Price Lock’ policy
T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert standing in front of a banner that reads Internet Freedom.

T-Mobile just got into some trouble with the National Advertising Program (NAD), a part of the BBB National Programs, an independent non-profit organization, for advertising its supposed “Price Lock” policy for 5G internet service.

Basically, the premise behind the “Price Lock” was a promise not to increase prices for customers who were on the Un-Contract Promise: “Starting January 18, 2024, customers activating or switching to an eligible rate plan get our Price Lock guarantee that only you can change what you pay—and we mean it!”

Read more
5 carriers you should use instead of T-Mobile
The T-Mobile logo on a smartphone.

When it comes to performance, quality, and reliability, T-Mobile is undoubtedly one of the best carriers in the U.S. It offers the fastest speeds and the broadest coverage with reasonably priced plans that include quite a few perks.

However, that may still add up to more than you want to pay; top-notch performance comes with a higher price tag attached. The good news is that T-Mobile is far from the only game in town. In addition to the other two of the big three U.S. carriers -- AT&T and Verizon -- there are dozens of Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) that piggyback on the big carrier networks with more affordable plans that offer the same coverage and great performance at a fraction of the price. You’ll get fewer perks, and customer service may not be as responsive, but those may be reasonable tradeoffs for how much you’ll save.

Read more