Skip to main content

FCC issues wallet-burning $34.9 million fine to Chinese retailer for selling signal jammers

fcc issues 34 9 million fine company selling signal jammers cell phone jammer
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Federal Communications Commission has issued a whopping $34.9 million fine, its largest ever, to Chinese online retailer CTS Technology.

The FCC alleges that CTS Technology marketed nearly 300 signal jammers in the United States over more than two years. It is illegal to advertise, sell, and operate a signal jammer in the United States due to its ability to block 911 and other emergency calls, as well as communication between law enforcement. According to the FCC, CTS Technology also lied to consumers by saying that the signal jammers were approved by the FCC for consumer use.

Recommended Videos

The jammers, 10 of which were sold to FCC personnel, were allegedly able to block cell signals, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, satellite radio, and GPS, among others. Some jammers were even effective up to half a mile away. Regardless, the FCC doesn’t take the sale of signal jammers lightly.

“Signal jammers present a direct danger to public safety, potentially blocking the communications of first responders,” said FCC enforcement bureau active chief Travis LeBlanc in a statement.

Along with the $34.9 million fine, the maximum penalty that can be issued for such an offense, CTS Technology is ordered to halt the sale and marketing of signal jammers in the United States. Lastly, the online retailer is ordered to hand over information about those who purchased signal jammers from it. CTS Technology can appeal the the fine or ask for a reduction, though it will have to pay up within 30 days if it doesn’t do so.

The FCC seems to take signal jammers very seriously. Earlier this year, it fined a man $48,000 for using one while on the highway. At least he wasn’t fined $34.9 million, however.

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
See Motorola’s latest updates to its rollable phone concept
Motorola Rizr bottom.

Motorola is refining the exciting Rizr concept smartphone shown during Mobile World Congress (MWC) earlier this year, according to a patent filed in the U.S. in November. In case you missed it, the Rizr is a continuation of its popular Razr folding smartphones, but this timewith a motorized rollable screen that retracts and extends to increase the viewing area, or minimize the size of the phone.

The patent addresses how we may eventually unlock the phone using a fingerprint sensor. When the phone’s screen is raised or retracted, a single fixed-position, in-display fingerprint sensor wouldn’t always work, so Motorola is experimenting with multiple fingerprint sensors and a larger activation area to solve the problem.

Read more
I took four of the best phones to NYC for a wild camera test. Here are the results
close up photo of cameras on the iPhone 16 Pro, Galaxy S24 Ultra, OnePlus 12 and Pixel 9 Pro

If you’re in the U.S. and looking for a smartphone camera that won’t let you down, there’s a strong chance that you’ll land on a phone from one of four phone makers: Samsung, Google, OnePlus, or Apple.

The Galaxy S24 Ultra is widely regarded as having the best smartphone telephoto lens in the U.S., thanks to its 10x zoom. Google continues to work wonders with the triple camera array in its Pixel 9 Pro, while the OnePlus 12 offers outstanding performance at a more affordable price. Then there’s the iPhone 16 Pro, with its 5x telephoto camera, which was exclusive to the iPhone 15 Pro Max last year.

Read more
Boost Mobile’s 5G network is becoming a real threat to other carriers
Boost Mobile store.

Boost Mobile has always been seen as a smaller phone service provider, but the trade-off of that is the lower prices it offers. The company has now announced major upgrades to its growing 5G network.

Previously, Boost Mobile operated as an MVNO (or mobile virtual network operator). In other words, Boost didn't have its own towers — it sort of piggybacked off the towers of other networks.

Read more