Skip to main content

Chinese phone makers are challenging the Play Store. Should Google be worried?

The Trump administration’s Huawei clampdown left a lasting scar on Chinese phone makers’ relationship with the West. The ban sent them scrambling for alternatives to U.S.-based services like Google and Android, as it continued to underline how dependent their businesses were on U.S. partnerships. Inevitably, the effects of those strains have now begun to take shape.

A week ago, China’s top handset companies — which, together, reign over nearly half of the global smartphone market — announced they are joining forces to build a new app store. Officially called the Global Developer Service Alliance (GDSA), it includes Huawei, Xiaomi, Vivo, and Oppo. The platform’s objective is to allow developers from across the globe to easily distribute and market their apps across each brand’s devices in overseas markets such as India, Europe, and China.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Currently, companies that wish to offer their services in countries like China are forced to reengineer their apps for each manufacturer. Since the Google Play Store is banned in China, each manufacturer has its own, in-house app store. The GDSA hopes to unify these digital marketplaces to create a one-stop-shop for apps, movies, music, and games across these four brands.

Recommended Videos

“The Global Developer Service Alliance (GDSA) is committed to providing one-stop services including content distribution, development support, marketing operation, brand promotion, and traffic monetization to global developers,” writes the GDSA on its website.

If the GDSA’s offering sounds familiar, that’s because it is. The new app store could potentially threaten Google’s Play Store in international markets. It’s the first of the many steps China-based phone makers would need to take to develop a comparable backup to Android itself and ensure they don’t end up in the same dire situation as Huawei.

“The U.S. restrictions on ZTE and Huawei are a big motivating force for Chinese vendors to be more self-reliant, including not just app stores like the GDSA and Huawei’s moves with Harmony OS and HMS, but also the local semiconductor industry, among others,” said Bryan Ma, vice president of devices research at market research company IDC.

Beyond Android

As Huawei has shown, phone makers that rely on Android and other Google services are defenseless in the event the U.S. government issues a ban against them. If developers begin to embrace the GDSA, incentivized by the large markets it covers and one-app-fits-all app deployment, it could mitigate some of the international impacts of a U.S. ban for any of these Chinese phone manufacturers.

Xiaomi, however, claims that the GDSA was not formed to challenge the Play Store or be a rival to Google services.

“The Global Developer Service Alliance solely serves to facilitate the uploading of apps by developers to respective app stores of Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo simultaneously. There’s no competing interest between this service and Google Play Store,” added a Xiaomi spokesperson.

“There’s no competing interest between this service and Google Play Store.”

It’s worth keeping in mind that these companies already bundle custom app stores on their phones alongside the Play Store, and they are fairly popular. Huawei’s AppGallery, for instance, houses apps such as Amazon, Booking, Brainly, TikTok, Todoist, and more.

Each GDSA member could leverage their dominant positions in different regions to promote and jump-start the new store. In India, which is the only country that registers positive growth in the smartphone market, Chinese companies hold about three-quarters of the entire share. Similarly, Vivo and Oppo hold pole positions in Southeast Asia and Huawei in Western Europe. When GDSA’s China availability is taken into account, it more or less has the same reach as the Play Store.


If GDSA’s efforts succeed in countries where these companies have strong footholds, it could prove vastly detrimental to Google’s developer revenues.

In fact, there’s a good chance the GDSA will capitalize on the fact that Google takes 30% of the Play Store revenue from developers. At its recent dev summit, Huawei tried courting app makers through a 20 million euro investment, promising to ask only for a 15% cut on app store revenues.

What’s more, OnePlus is owned by the same parent company that also controls Realme, Vivo, and Oppo. That means that OnePlus, which has been gaining steady momentum in the U.S. market, could one day pop up with this GDSA app store installed — giving the U.S. a taste of what it has to offer, including potentially exclusive Chinese apps or games, the freedom to install apps without a Google account, and a platform for Western developers to easily distribute their apps in China where the Play Store is absent.

Huawei’s own OS

GDSA isn’t the only entity that attempts to emulate certain facets of Android. As the United States continues to delay issuing it a license, Huawei is actively working on its own in-house operating system called HarmonyOS, which the company says will be available on everything from phones to smart TVs. Last year, Xiaomi, Vivo, and Oppo also collaborated on an AirDrop-style file transfer app — something Google’s Android still lacks.

Of course, there are still several missing pieces of the puzzle that members of the GDSA would have to find to create a viable alternative to Google’s Play Store. The absence of Google’s core services and apps on a GDSA alternative is enough for most buyers, as well as developers, to look elsewhere. There’s also the question of how seamless GDSA’s APIs (application programming interfaces) will be when compared to the Play Store and whether they will be straightforward enough for indie developers to consider them.

“I’d also point out that the GDSA’s efforts are just an app store right now. Sure, combining forces means a bigger user base to attract developers. But if it doesn’t have first-party Google apps, then it still doesn’t solve Huawei’s current woes with Google Mobile Services,” added IDC’s Ma.

“If it doesn’t have first-party Google apps, then it still doesn’t solve Huawei’s current woes.”

While Google doesn’t have a reason to sweat just yet, it may have to begin gearing up for a day when Chinese phone makers band together to produce an Android alternative. Except for in the United States, where Congress could step in to throw a wrench in their growth, these manufacturers may have the capacity, as well as the resources, to take on Google. In case GDSA does take off, Google’s first course of action will likely be to slash Play Store taxes. It could also introduce better incentives for developers who decide to offer their services exclusively on the Play Store.

It’s unlikely Google will be able to immediately ban the GDSA since that would require it to step over antitrust lines. Android is also open source, which means the search engine giant cannot block Chinese companies from building up custom software on top of it either.

The question that remains hanging in the balance is this: Will Google capitalize on its current position to stymie the rise of the GDSA?

Shubham Agarwal
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Shubham Agarwal is a freelance technology journalist from Ahmedabad, India. His work has previously appeared in Firstpost…
The biggest challenge for foldable phones in 2023? Variety
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 sitting on a bench.

Huawei recently announced that it is launching a new foldable smartphone, the Pocket S, which looks to be a pretty solid addition to the current foldable landscape — touting decent specs and a competitive price point. The only major problem with it is that it’s launching as a regional exclusive, something that seems to be a recurring issue with foldable devices.

Foldables are clearly on the rise, with new options launching at a more rapid pace, and many in the U.S. want in on it — but there’s one problem: in the U.S., there simply aren’t that many foldable phones to choose from. Here, the list of viable foldables on the market is pretty small. We’ve got the one-two punch of the Galaxy Z Fold 4 and the Galaxy Z Flip 4, as well as the 2020 Motorola Razr, but that’s about it.
The greener foldable grass

Read more
Google Play Store now offers third-party app payments, but only for some users
The Google Play store icon on an Android phone.

Google will now open up its Play Store as a result of the European Union's Digital Markets Act, the company announced today. Now, any developers distributing apps or games in Europe (the European Economic Area, to be precise) will be able to sidestep the Google Play billing system with no penalty. The change comes after a similar push in South Korea.

"As of today, Google will not remove or reject updates of non-gaming apps from participating developers for offering alternative billing systems for EEA users. Google Play’s billing system will continue to be required for apps and games distributed via Play to users outside the EEA and for games distributed to users within the EEA. We expect to expand billing alternatives to developers of gaming apps for their users in the EEA, in advance of the DMA's effective date," Google's Estelle Werth, director of EU Government Affairs and Public Policy, said in a blog post.

Read more
2MP phone cameras aren’t going anywhere any time soon
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G camera seen from the back.

If you're buying a typical cheap smartphone, you'll often see triple or quadruple cameras touted as a feature, with two of those cameras being nigh useless. A report from analyst firm Trendforce sees this as a trend that's unlikely to go away soon, though, noting: "Growth momentum in mobile phone camera module shipments in 2022 will come primarily from additional numbers of low-pixel cameras prompted by the three-camera design."

The past five years have given rise to a new trend where phone brands compete on the number of cameras in their devices, with one even offering as many as five at one point. In 2022, a typical mid-range Android phone comes with at least three cameras, out of which only the primary sensor is useful and the other two are also present. By now, a lot has been said about how useless 2MP macro and depth sensors are on a modern smartphone. But unfortunately, they are here to stay.

Read more