Skip to main content

Google lobbying legislators in effort to prevent Glass driving bans

google_glass_frames_split
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google has been sending lobbyists to a number of US states where legislators are considering restricting the use of Glass behind the wheel.

The Mountain View company is clearly keen to act early, possibly fearing that any early legislation banning the use of Glass could snowball, with other states feeling compelled to follow suit soon after. If the new tech hits the market with driving bans across the country already in place, it could seriously diminish the appeal of the specs for some consumers.

Recommended Videos

Google is known to be lobbying legislators in at least three US states –Illinois, Delaware, and Missouri – while at least eight states across the country are looking at the possibility of restricting the use of Glass, Reuters said Tuesday.

Illinois state Senator Ira Silverstein, a Chicago Democrat who introduced a bill proposing restrictions on Glass at the end of last year, said he had met a number of Google lobbyists who were hoping to “kill” the bill.

‘It may have a place in society’

Delaware Republican Representative Joseph Miro, who is also looking to restrict the use of Glass behind the wheel, told Reuters that he wasn’t against Google’s wearable tech, and that “it may have a place in society.” He added that his primary concern is that “while you are driving, you should have nothing that is going to impede the concentration of the driver.”

When Reuters asked Google about its lobbying campaign, the Web giant responded by saying that “tech issues are a big part of current policy discussions in the US,” and that it was “important” to be involved in such discussions.

A dangerous distraction?

With Google already testing Glass in the field with its army of Explorers, it was probably only a matter of time before one of them had a run in with the authorities while testing out the device in the car. Cecilia Abadie was accused by a California cop of “driving with monitor visible to driver” last year, though the case was dismissed by a court in January.

While critics of Glass believe the wearable tech could be a dangerous distraction for drivers, with its display flashing up a potentially vast range of information, Google is likely to be arguing that far from being interfering, it could actually aid a driver, with data such as turn-by-turn navigation directions and road conditions appearing ahead of the driver’s eye, eliminating the need to look across to a conventional car navigation system or fiddle about with a smartphone.

Indeed, having tried Glass, DT’s mobile editor Jeffrey Van Camp found that it was in no way a distraction. “It sits on your face, requires virtually no physical interaction, and doesn’t block your vision,” Jeffrey said, adding, “Its screen appears to float about a yard in front of your eye, in the upper right corner of your vision. It’s not big, it moves with your head (so you can easily move it out of the way), and you can see through it.”

To date, no states have imposed restrictions on the use of Glass while driving.

Topics
Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Google’s life-changing AR smart glasses demo gave me shivers
Google's AR smartglasses translation feature demonstrated.

When Viva and Yoshiko, one an English speaker and the other a Mandarin Chinese speaker, tried Google’s prototype smart glasses during a sneak peek at Google I/O 2022, I got shivers down my spine. The expressions on their faces, the sudden ability to meaningfully communicate with someone who before didn’t fully understand what was being said moved me a great deal. It’s an example of the type of technology that I truly love: One that can change lives.
'Subtitles for the world'
You’d be forgiven if you’d missed this special moment during Google I/O, as it came right at the end of the marathon event, and lasted for just a few minutes. The actual smart glasses were not named, only shown in a demonstration video, and really only revealed as a concept. Google didn’t even show us the interface itself or hint that the smart glasses will ever be released as an actual product.

Breaking down language barriers with augmented reality | Google

Read more
10 years on, Google Glass is still a Google I/O high point
Sergey Brin demonstrating Google Glass on stage at Google I/O 2012.

The introduction of Google Glass during the Google I/O 2012 keynote presentation was Google at its feisty, unpredictable best. It marked the beginning of the groundbreaking wearable device's short, tumultuous life as a consumer product, and was truly representative of what made Google such an exciting company at the time.

But Google I/O 2012 also introduced another crucial piece of Google hardware, the Nexus 7. However, the modest little tablet's resulting life had a very different direction indeed. As the 10th anniversary of these products approaches, and on the cusp of Google I/O 2022, we celebrate them both in a pair of retrospectives, beginning with Google Glass.
Falling from the sky
“You have to want to be on the bleeding edge.”

Read more
Google just banned call-recording apps from the Play Store
google-pixel-3a-xl-phone-call

Google will soon ban third-party call-recording apps from the Play Store. First highlighted by a developer of an affected app, Google made the announcement in a Google Play policy update that becomes effective on May 11. Once in force, developers who want to submit apps to the Play Store will no longer be able to use the Android Accessibility API to record calls, killing the utility of call-recording apps on Android.

Google hasn't allowed third-party call recording on Android officially for years now. It's no surprise as call recording is a legal minefield, with different countries and even states having their own rules. If you're using a first-party phone app, you'll notice that this feature appears or disappears depending on where your phone thinks you are, and third-party recording apps hacking onto the company Accessibility API were one way to get around this.

Read more