Skip to main content

Google Nexus S Review

Google Nexus S.
Google Nexus S
“Google’s Nexus S represents cell phone schizophrenia. It's ahead of its time in some ways, behind the times in others.”
Pros
  • Large 4-inch WVGA (480 x 800) Super AMOLED screen
  • Faster Android v2.3 Gingerbread OS
  • 1GHz Cortez A8 Hummingbird processor
  • Long battery life
  • 16GB memory built-in
Cons
  • Screen has greenish tint
  • Poor camera, VGA camcorder
  • No microSD slot
  • No pre-installed video chat software
  • No social network account syncing

For its next-generation Nexus phone, the unlocked Nexus S made by Samsung (but usually sold with a T-Mobile subsidy for $199.99), Google has produced what can be best described as an advanced basic smartphone. It features some bleeding-edge technologies such as a 4-inch AMOLED screen, Android 2.3 Gingerbread, NFC tag reading, a front-facing camera, and both tethering and mobile hotspot capabilities. These advanced features are undercut, however, by its lack of soon-to-be-standard features for smartphones of its ilk, such as high-definition video recording, HSPA+ 4G to fuel its mobile hotspot, and no pre-installed video chatting app. It makes a fine introduction to Android, but is unlikely to appeal to more advanced users moving to their second or third smartphones.

Features and design

If the Nexus S looks vaguely familiar – that’s because it’s a slightly redesigned version of Samsung’s Galaxy S phone for T-Mobile, the Vibrant. The Nexus S is molded with slightly rounder corners, lacks Vibrant’s silver perimeter band, and moves the microUSB and the headphone jack from the top to the bottom of the phone. They both have a distinctive rear bump on the bottom, and a 4-inch Super AMOLED (active matrix organic light emitting diode) screen. This one is brighter and more colorful, although it does tend toward the greener part of the spectrum. Otherwise, physically, they’re the same phone.

Inside, while both sport a 1GHz processor, the Nexus S runs Google’s latest and fastest Android OS, v2.3 Gingerbread, while Vibrant runs 2.2 Froyo. Both phones include a 5-megapixel camera, but the Nexus S includes an LED flash. The Vibrant includes 720p high-definition recording, while the Nexus S mysteriously records only 720 x 480.

The phone’s singular breakthrough is the inclusion of NFC, near field communication. Wave the Nexus S over an NFC tag, such as an RFID (radio frequency identification) code, from an inch or two away to initiate or perform all manner of functions. NFC can be used as electronic money, sort of like a Blink credit card. An NFC-endowed phone can be used as a ticket, a hotel room key, or for information exchange between devices. It can be used to quickly pair a Bluetooth headset. It can link you to a Web site or activate a function or download.

In other words, there are lots of potential NFC usages, and one day all cellphones will be so endowed. But right now, there are few NFC tags to be read anywhere in the U.S. (Google has initiated a pilot program in Portland, OR). By the time NFC tags become ubiquitous, the Nexus S will be an ancient smartphone.

Similarly undercut is the Nexus S’ front-facing VGA camera, by the lack of QIK or other video-chatting software preinstalled. While there is 16GB of memory built in, like the iPhone, the Nexus S lacks a microSD slot for additional memory.

Multimedia capabilities

With its bright, crystalline Super AMOLED screen, the Nexus S makes a wonderful video viewer. YouTube videos load automatically in full screen at high quality. Out only quibble is the screen’s slight green-or-yellowish discoloration, sort of like the tint you see on old displays. Fortunately, it isn’t nearly as bad as the gray sheen that seems to overlay all images on Vibrant.

Google supplements output from the earpiece with a small but loud speaker on the rear. It’s got a tiny guard over the grille, which means music still sounds loud with only a hint of muffling when the phone is placed on its back.

Sound quality

The Nexus S provides plenty of volume, but voices sounded muted and muffled at both ends of cell-to-cell calls, a little less on calls to and from land lines. The excellent rear speaker provides just as much volume for voice as it does for music, lying face up or face-down.

Phone functionality

The Nexus S is faster in every respect – app downloading, booting, website loading, media up- and downloading – than nearly every other 3G Android phone with which we’ve played, although far outshined in data speed by T-Mobile’s 4G phones.

But even though it runs a slightly newer OS and has fun animations on its home page and other gadgets, in many ways the Vibrant is a more finished OS. Settings icons are monochrome on the Nexus S, for instance, color on the Vibrant. On Vibrant you can add contact, photo and social networking accounts syncing for Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and other, but not on Nexus S, which means no Facebook photos to flesh out your Nexus S contact list. These aren’t major drawbacks, merely surprising given Nexus’ supposedly superior OS.

What the Nexus S does vastly improve upon is the touch QWERTY keyboard, which now includes the oft-used @ symbol on the main alpha display, and a cleaner horizontal number row, rather than the dial pad-like 4-by-3 arrangement on the Vibrant.

The Nexus S provides one other tiny yet important convenience – the backlit function buttons beneath the screen (Back, Menu, Search, Home) remain lit as long as the display also is lit. On the Vibrant and other Galaxy S models, these controls go blank in a couple of seconds, leaving you to guess where they are once they go blank.

Web and connectivity

As noted, the Nexus S is generally much faster than Froyo 2.2 Android models. Web-optimized pages such as CNN, The New York Times, ESPN and Wikipedia load two to three seconds faster than on the Vibrant. Oddly, however, non-optimized pages such as The New York Daily News loaded a few seconds faster on the Vibrant than on the Nexus S.

However, the Nexus S often provided at least one bar of additional signal strength compared to the Vibrant, which on a few occasions slipped into EDGE while the Nexus S held one to two bars of 3G.

Camera

With all its advanced features, it’s somewhat shocking that Google imbued the Nexus with only a 720 x 480 video recorder, rather than the high-def recorder found in nearly every other new smartphone.

As with most cellphone cameras, the Nexus S shoots acceptable 5-megapixel photos outdoors, but even with a flash, indoor results are poor. Overall colors are flat, focus is lost away from the center of the image, and the flash often overwhelms the subject, leaving a bleached image.

Battery Life

Gingerbread’s primary improvement over Froyo is battery life. The Nexus S’ bright display draws nearly a third less power, cell standby mode uses around 10 percent less, and idle draws around 20 percent less, all of which results in far greater overall life. After two days of on-and-off usage, the Vibrant was down to around 20 percent remaining power, while the Nexus S retained nearly half its battery life.

Conclusion

Google’s Nexus S represents cell phone schizophrenia. It’s ahead of its time in some ways, behind the times in others. But these musings are moot; with the floodgates of 4G opening, the Nexus S is about to be drowned in phones with perhaps fewer bleeding-edge technologies, but touting strong 4G capabilities.

Highs:

  • Large 4-inch WVGA (480 x 800) Super AMOLED screen
  • Faster Android v2.3 Gingerbread OS
  • 1GHz Cortez A8 Hummingbird processor
  • Long battery life
  • 16GB memory built-in

Lows:

  • Screen has greenish tint
  • Poor camera, VGA camcorder
  • No microSD slot
  • No pre-installed video chat software
  • No social network account syncing

Editors' Recommendations

Stewart Wolpin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Samsung’s newest Android tablet is a perfect iPad alternative
A render of the front of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 2024.

Samsung has just launched a refreshed Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) for the U.S. exclusively through Amazon. This comes after Samsung recently launched the Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) internationally.

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (2024) is the latest entry in Samsung’s midrange tablet lineup that made its debut in 2020. This newest iteration has the same overall design, S Pen integration, screen, and just 4GB RAM. However, it now has a new Exynos processor and comes with Android 14 right out of the box.

Read more
The best cheap phones in 2024: our 9 favorites for tight budgets
The OnePlus 12R lying on a book with its screen turned on.

Don’t want to spend $1,000 or more on a new smartphone? We don’t blame you. The good news is there are plenty of models available for half that price, but the trick is knowing which cheap smartphone is worth buying. After all, just because you’re not spending flagship phone money doesn’t mean you want to be stuck with a phone that's rubbish. There are plenty of options out there for the best cheap phones!

We’ve collected the models that still give you great performance, good cameras, the right connectivity, and often a desirable design and brand name too — all for less money than you may expect. Cheap phones in 2024 will surprise you with their strong performance, making them more than capable of playing the latest games; plus they have batteries that will last you at least a day.

Read more
Bixby vs. Google Assistant: Which AI is better for you?
google assistant mobile.

The world of AI has seen tons of innovation recently, with ChatGPT and OpenAI stealing much of the spotlight over the past year. However, ChatGPT is relatively new compared to two other AI platforms available in 2024 -- Samsung's Bixby and Google Assistant. And while Bixby and Google Assistant might not have the "cool factor" of emerging AI systems, there's no denying their versatility and functionality.
Google Assistant and Samsung's Bixby are available on a variety of Android devices. They'll both take commands and help streamline your daily tasks -- but is one better than the other? And are Bixby and Google Assistant compatible with all Android devices, or are they limited in their reach? More importantly, do they work on devices beyond smartphones?
Here's a comprehensive comparison of Bixby and Google Assistant to help you decide which fits best with your lifestyle.
Bixby vs. Google Assistant: device integration

Google Assistant is available on all Google Nest and Home products, including Android TVs, lights, security cams, speakers, and more. Google Assistant is also available on Android Auto, so you can use the virtual assistant to execute commands when you’re driving. Google Assistant is available on other brands' smart devices too, so you can use Google's voice assistant on Lenovo's Smart Home System. You'll also find it in all of the best Android phones, but did you know you can also download and use it on Apple iPhones as well?
Samsung’s Bixby, on the other hand, is limited to Samsung devices, like the Galaxy S23 Ultra. It's also limited to only being able to control other devices via the SmartThings app, rather than having native support. It’s not necessarily a bad thing, but it is more restricted. However, full functionality of Bixby is limited to newer devices, so unlike Google Assistant, which tends to be available to older devices, you'll need to keep upgrading to get the most out of Bixby.
This won’t matter much for users who’ve been using Samsung devices for years and want to continue investing in new Samsung products, but if you live with people using different Android devices, Google Assistant might be a better option for smoother integration across devices.
The winner is pretty clear here. Google Assistant is available on a lot more devices, including Apple iPhones, and helps you to create a comprehensive system for convenient use. 
Winner: Google Assistant
Bixby vs. Google Assistant: performance and accessibility

Read more