Skip to main content

Google paid $1 billion to be the default search engine on the iPhone

google paid to be iphone default search engine apple 6s 7855
Jessica Lee Star/Digital Trends
Google is apparently paying Apple, by way of a revenue sharing agreement, a significant amount of money to remain the default search engine for the iPhone. The terms mean that in 2014, Apple received $1 billion from Google, according to a court transcript from the Oracle vs. Google lawsuit, in a report published by Bloomberg.

Speculation has always existed about how much the search agreement was worth to the two companies, but the amount has come as a surprise, after Apple chief executive Tim Cook attacked Google and Facebook in 2015 for “business models that undermine users’ privacy. “While the exact revenue split was not disclosed, Annette Hurst, Oracle’s attorney who disclosed this information, said at one point the figure was 34-percent, although it wasn’t made clear which company received that number.

Recommended Videos

Neither Google nor Apple wanted this information to become public, and lawyers for the former requested the figure be sealed, calling it “highly sensitive,” and saying it may affect both company’s ability to negotiate in the future. The request from Google was denied, but Bloomberg states the transcript has since (mysteriously) been removed from electronic court records.

While Google’s search bar may remain in iOS, it doesn’t have complete hold over iOS. In 2013, Apple made Bing the default search engine for Siri, the virtual personal assistant introduced with iOS 5. Although there are ways to change Bing (and Google, for that matter) for other search engines, the vast majority of users will stay with the standard option. It’s also a safe assumption a similar revenue sharing deal is in place between Microsoft and Apple.

The revenue share agreement has become public knowledge via an ongoing lawsuit between Oracle and Google, in which Oracle alleges Google used Java software to develop the Android mobile OS without paying for it. The case has been going on since 2010, and the enterprise software giant is seeking $1 billion in damages.

David Curry
Former Digital Trends Contributor
David has been writing about technology for several years, following the latest trends and covering the largest events. He is…
How to fast charge your iPhone
iPhone 12 Mini with charger

While they may not be some of the longest-lasting smartphones on the market, modern iPhones boast more than respectable battery life that should be able to get you through an entire day's use without breaking too much of a sweat. Of course, that assumes a lot of things — including a battery that's still relatively new and in good health, plus a usage pattern that doesn't include all-day streaming or gaming.

But for some people, overnight charging isn't going to cut it, and you'll want to get your battery topped up again as quickly as you can so you can get back in action. Thankfully, every iPhone released in the past six years supports much faster charging, but the downside is that with very few exceptions, Apple has never supplied you with the right adapter to get the best possible charging speeds from your iPhone.

Read more
5 phones you should buy instead of the iPhone 16
Someone holding the iPhone 16.

Apple’s iPhone 16 has arrived, and it’s quite an impressive offering this year. Not only does it come in some of the best colors we’ve seen in a while, but it closes the gap between the base and Pro models even more.

That's all to say the iPhone 16 is a fantastic phone, but if you’re thinking about buying it as your next smartphone purchase, you should also consider some of these alternatives.
iPhone 16 Plus

Read more
I was wrong about the iPhone 16
An iPhone 16 laying on a shelf with its screen on.

The iPhone 16 is a little over a month old, and I've been using it almost nonstop since it was announced last month. I reviewed the phone for Digital Trends and bought one with my own money as my personal phone of choice.

Not long after its unveiling, I wrote an op-ed complaining about the iPhone 16's lack of a 120Hz display. I said it was the "one thing holding back the iPhone 16" and that its 60Hz screen was "an unreasonable spec." I'd still like to see the refresh rate addressed with the iPhone 17, but after living with the iPhone 16 for over a month now, I've found that it's not nearly as big of an issue as I believed it would be.
A 60Hz screen matters, until it doesn't

Read more