Skip to main content

iPhone 12 Mini owners reporting lock-screen sensitivity issue

A number of iPhone 12 Mini users have been reporting a sensitivity issue with the device’s lock screen.

The smallest handset in Apple’s new iPhone 12 line-up started landing in customers’ hands on Friday, November 13, and soon after messages started landing on online forums pointing out the problem.

Recommended Videos

The issue seems to be occurring when trying to swipe up to unlock, or trying to activate the camera from the lock screen. In such cases, the display fails to respond.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Forum posters are reporting a range of experiences, with some saying the problem is only occurring when the phone has both a case and screen protector on, while others claim that it’s the use of a screen protector alone that’s causing the unexpected behavior.

Others have pointed out that it sounds like a grounding or conductivity issue, with some able to get the phone working by plugging it in.

It’s hard to say how widespread the issue is but posts on the forums have been increasing in the three days since the iPhone 12 Mini started shipping.

Apple will by now be well aware of customer complaints but the tech giant is yet to respond publicly about the apparent problem.

Digital Trends has reached out to the company for more information and we will update this article when we hear back.

The iPhone 12 Mini launched alongside the iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro, and iPhone 12 Pro Max. As its name suggests, its 5.4-inch screen makes it the smallest of the four devices, with the 12 and 12 Pro featuring a 6.1-inch display, and the Max coming with a 6.7-inch display. The frame of the iPhone 12 Mini is also smaller than that of the recently launched iPhone SE, as well as the iPhone 6, 7, and 8.

The Mini is expected to be a big seller as many Apple fans have been calling for a smaller iPhone that they can stick in their pocket and operate comfortably with one hand, after recent launches just felt too big for many customers.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Foldable iPhone leak predicts a stunning phone worth the long wait
Concept render of a foldable iPhone.

Apple’s absence from the foldable phone market has been quite conspicuous, if not alarming. The likes of Samsung are into their seventh year of pushing foldable phones, while almost every major Chinese brand has done remarkable work, as well.

It seems the long wait for a foldable iPhone might be worth it, assuming you have the patience to stay put until 2027.

Read more
Apple’s foldable iPhone might serve a price shock
Conceptual foldable iPhone running Notes app.

Apple’s foldable iPhone project has so far remained in the realms of consumer tech imaginations. However, from time to time, we hear industry insiders and analysts dropping a few nuggets of information about it. The latest such prediction comes from Ming-Chi Kuo, and it’s not a good one.

In his latest investor note, Kuo has given an expected price range of roughly $2,000 to $2,500 for Apple’s book style folding phone. For comparison, Samsung’s latest and greatest foldable phone, the Galaxy Z Fold 6, carries a price tag worth $1,900.

Read more
An iPhone 17e may be in the cards, but will we ever see an iPhone 18e?
The iPhone 16e display

The Apple iPhone 16e is still fresh on the shelves, but a tip from Fixed Focus Digital suggests the Apple iPhone 17e is all-but guaranteed. For reference, Fixed Focus Digital was the first to suggest the "16e" name when everyone else — ourselves included — guess it would be called the iPhone SE 4.

The continuation of the "1xe" naming system makes sense. With the apparent death of the "SE" lineup, the 16e and any future iterations are in a prime spot to take its place. Fixed Focus Digital shared the news on Weibo, saying "I see 17e there. The digital e-series is not a short-lived model." The original post was not in English, so allow some room for potential translation errors.

Read more