Apple's troubles in Japan continue as antitrust watchdog may spring into action

By Williams Pelegrin September 26, 2016

Apple iPhone 7 — Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

Japan’s Fair Trade Commission seems to have had enough of alleged antitrust activities involving Apple and its carrier partners in the country, since the agency is considering taking action, reports Reuters.

In August, the FTC released a report that implicated the likes of NTT Docomo, KDDI Corp., and Softbank Group, alleging these top carriers within Japan are inhibiting the ability of smaller competitors to compete by refusing to sell them older surplus iPhones. More specifically, the three aforementioned carriers have deals in place that have them send older, surplus iPhones to other regions.

Furthermore, they reportedly buy iPhones in bulk and sell them at a discount, which gives Apple an advantage over competitors like Samsung. For example, the iPhone 7 and Galaxy S7 Edge can be purchased through NTT Docomo without a contract for 93,960 yen ($932), but the iPhone 7’s price drops to 38,232 yen ($379) if you opt for a two-year contract. By comparison, the Galaxy S7 Edge drops to 54,432 yen ($539).

As such, regulators are also interested in taking a look at Apple’s supply agreements with NTT Docomo, KDDI Corp., and Softbank Group, even though the U.S.-based company was not named in August’s report.

According to unnamed officials, the FTC wants to put enough pressure on these carriers to eliminate any antitrust violation, even if this involves renegotiating their contracts with Apple. “We are getting closer to taking action,” said an unnamed official. All three carriers have denied any wrongdoing on their part.

It’s worth noting that Apple is already under scrutiny in Japan over its tax practices. According to the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau, the company underreported its income in 2014 and 2015 by sending portions of its income to Ireland, where Apple did not pay taxes on the international transaction. As a result, Japan ordered the company to pay $118 million, and Apple has since complied.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Williams Pelegrin

Former Digital Trends Contributor

Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…

Mobile

Why the lawsuit against Apple’s AirTags may be bigger than you realize

Nomad Apple TV Siri Remote Case with an AirTag installed.

Apple is facing yet another lawsuit, but this one could very well define the future of AirTags. Two women who were victims of stalking using AirTags have filed a class-action lawsuit against Apple in a district court in Northern California. The plaintiffs cite incidents where former partners hid AirTags in a car wheel and a child’s backpack to track their whereabouts and harass them.
The ordeal is harrowing, but it’s not the first of its kind. Ever since AirTags went on sale, reports of stalking and using them to steal cars have been all over the internet. But this time, Apple has been dragged to court over a rather comprehensive set of charges.

Accusing Apple of gross negligence, the plaintiffs allege that the company rushed out a product without proper safeguards.
The design has also been lambasted as the trackers didn’t perform as expected, even though Apple claimed the AirTags are “stalker-proof.” The lawsuit mentions that “AirTag’s design defect was a substantial factor” in causing harm. To recall, AirTags weren’t initially loud enough, and after being flagged, Apple decided to bump up their sonic warning capability.

Mobile

Apple responds to troubling iPhone 14 Pro camera issue

An image of two iPhone 14 Pro Max's laying on top of one another.

Soon after Apple’s new iPhone 14 Pro began landing in customers’ hands on Friday, reports started surfacing of a troubling issue with the handset's camera.

When using the phone's camera within apps such as TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat, some owners saw the camera mechanism starting to vibrate rapidly and also make a weird buzzing sound, causing an unstable and blurry image to appear on the display.

Mobile

Apple’s Ceramic Shield may change your mind about an iPhone 14 screen protector

iPhone 13 Pro side view.

Just how much do you need a screen protector on your new iPhone 14? Screen protectors are like cases — we don’t always want to buy and use them but feel we should protect our investment from harm. But with that comes the expense, the awkwardness of fitting the things, and sometimes a change in the feel of the glass under our finger.

The iPhone 14 Pro uses a special type of protective glass Apple calls Ceramic Shield, which it says offers scratch resistance and four times the drop protection versus iPhone models without the special glass. Is there any point in fitting a screen protector to it, and if you don’t, what will your phone look like after a year? That’s what we’ve found out.
What is Ceramic Shield?
Ceramic Shield glass was introduced on the iPhone 12 series, was used on the iPhone 13 series, and is fitted to the new iPhone 14 models, too. It doesn’t matter whether you buy a regular iPhone 14, the iPhone 14 Pro, or the iPhone 14 Pro Max — it has Apple’s Ceramic Shield glass on the front. Like the familiar Gorilla Glass fitted on many Android devices, Apple’s Ceramic Shield has also been developed by experts at Corning.