Skip to main content

LiveRider iPhone bike computer: hands-on review

LiveRider
Image used with permission by copyright holder

I almost crashed into a baby the first time I rode with the LiveRider iPhone bike computer. Not just a baby, but a woman riding perpendicular to me with a baby carrier on the back of her bike. I was fiddling with the phone trying to see how much wattage I was pumping out at 30mph and didn’t see her in the crosswalk.

My bike squealed to a stop in time, and the baby’s OK. Thanks for asking. But I bring it up not to highlight my own carelessness (which I’m afraid it does anyway), but to illustrate a bigger point: The iPhone wasn’t necessarily meant to live on handlebars.

Recommended Videos

LiveRider iPhone ScreenShotThe Premise

I’m both a bicycle commuter, and a nerd. When I first saw the announcement for LiveRider, a tiny, plug-in accessory that would allow me to use my iPhone as a bike computer, using its own speed and cadence sensors, my head whirred with possibilities.

Maybe it could use GPS data – combined with even more accurate speed and distance readings from its own wheel sensor – to accurately plot every trip I made on a map. Use the phone’s internal gyroscope – or GPS – to recognize the inclines I was climbing and give accurate watt-output readings based on my weight and my bike’s weight. Tap into Google’s brand new bicycle routing and give me turn-by-turn directions that would use bike routes and trails inaccessible to cars to get me safely to the grocery store.

The Letdown

Here comes the stick in the spokes: The LiveRider doesn’t do any of these things. Despite residing on the iPhone, which the computational horsepower, sensors and screen to make a standard bicycle computer look like a Ford Fiesta beside the Space Shuttle Atlantis, LiveRider aspires to do little more than emulate the same functions you can already get from a device the size of a quarter.

Plug a little sensor into the bottom of your phone, slide it into a gigantic rubber mount that zip ties to your handlebars, align a wireless wheel sensor and pedal sensor, and you’re good to go.

It makes a very solid bike computer, to be fair. The LiveRider tracks basics like speed, total distance, and time, but also advanced features like estimated watt output (without factoring slopes, making it quite inaccurate), calories burned, and even a chase feature that lets you set a target pace and watch your progress beside a virtual rider. When you’re done with a ride, you can view a graph of your speed or cadence, then e-mail it off to someone.

The logging feature stands out as the biggest edge the LiveRider has here. No pint-sized cycle computer we know of can show you a full-color graph, let alone allow you to e-mail it off with a touch. But unless you and your cycling nemesis live in different cities, we’re not sure who wants to see bar graphs of how quickly you zoomed around the block. We would rather see tracks plotted on a map – but the LiveRider app remains completely oblivious to location – sorry, no GPS tracking here. You can open a map and see where you are at any given point, though, in case you would rather not pop out of the program to do the same thing on Google Maps.

Using your iPhone as a bike computer also comes with some tradeoffs that will make you question whether you might be better off with a standalone replacement. Sure, the 3.5-inch screen is huge, but you’ll also have a mondo-sized rubber iPhone mount that straps onto the handlebars with cable ties. Text messages will pop over the speedometer, forcing you to close them as you ride. And without any screen protection, you won’t want to use it in the rain – or risk skirting through the mist of those early-morning sprinklers on Portland’s waterfront park.

The Verdict

The LiveRider lets you skip buying a standalone cycle computer and strap an iPhone on the handlebars instead. But for $100, you should think twice before passing on the old-school option. The iPhone is more cumbersome, less readable in sunlight, more sensitive to inclimate weather, and if you already have yours in a case, you’ll have to take it in and out every time you ride. It also lacks some features that many cyclocomputers in this price range have, like temperature, altitude, estimated time of arrival, and the ability to pair with a heart rate monitor. Serious cyclists will get a kick out of the awfully slick graphic user interface, ride stats, and the chase bike option, but we have our fingers and toes crossed that future software updates will offer even more compelling features that truly tap all the resources the iPhone offers.

Highs:

  • Accurate RPM, speed, time readings
  • Secure, easy-to-use mount
  • Wireless sensor
  • Easy to log, view and share speed and RPM data

Lows:

  • Doesn’t leverage iPhone’s full potential
  • No GPS tracking, navigation, altitude, inclination, heart rate
  • Wattage doesn’t factor hills
  • Dorky, oversized iPhone mount
Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
BYD’s cheap EVs might remain out of Canada too
BYD Han

With Chinese-made electric vehicles facing stiff tariffs in both Europe and America, a stirring question for EV drivers has started to arise: Can the race to make EVs more affordable continue if the world leader is kept out of the race?

China’s BYD, recognized as a global leader in terms of affordability, had to backtrack on plans to reach the U.S. market after the Biden administration in May imposed 100% tariffs on EVs made in China.

Read more
Tesla posts exaggerate self-driving capacity, safety regulators say
Beta of Tesla's FSD in a car.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is concerned that Tesla’s use of social media and its website makes false promises about the automaker’s full-self driving (FSD) software.
The warning dates back from May, but was made public in an email to Tesla released on November 8.
The NHTSA opened an investigation in October into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with the FSD software, following three reported collisions and a fatal crash. The investigation centers on FSD’s ability to perform in “relatively common” reduced visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
In these instances, it appears that “the driver may not be aware that he or she is responsible” to make appropriate operational selections, or “fully understand” the nuances of the system, NHTSA said.
Meanwhile, “Tesla’s X (Twitter) account has reposted or endorsed postings that exhibit disengaged driver behavior,” Gregory Magno, the NHTSA’s vehicle defects chief investigator, wrote to Tesla in an email.
The postings, which included reposted YouTube videos, may encourage viewers to see FSD-supervised as a “Robotaxi” instead of a partially automated, driver-assist system that requires “persistent attention and intermittent intervention by the driver,” Magno said.
In one of a number of Tesla posts on X, the social media platform owned by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a driver was seen using FSD to reach a hospital while undergoing a heart attack. In another post, a driver said he had used FSD for a 50-minute ride home. Meanwhile, third-party comments on the posts promoted the advantages of using FSD while under the influence of alcohol or when tired, NHTSA said.
Tesla’s official website also promotes conflicting messaging on the capabilities of the FSD software, the regulator said.
NHTSA has requested that Tesla revisit its communications to ensure its messaging remains consistent with FSD’s approved instructions, namely that the software provides only a driver assist/support system requiring drivers to remain vigilant and maintain constant readiness to intervene in driving.
Tesla last month unveiled the Cybercab, an autonomous-driving EV with no steering wheel or pedals. The vehicle has been promoted as a robotaxi, a self-driving vehicle operated as part of a ride-paying service, such as the one already offered by Alphabet-owned Waymo.
But Tesla’s self-driving technology has remained under the scrutiny of regulators. FSD relies on multiple onboard cameras to feed machine-learning models that, in turn, help the car make decisions based on what it sees.
Meanwhile, Waymo’s technology relies on premapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar), which might be very costly, but has met the approval of safety regulators.

Read more
Waymo, Nexar present AI-based study to protect ‘vulnerable’ road users
waymo data vulnerable road users ml still  1 ea18c3

Robotaxi operator Waymo says its partnership with Nexar, a machine-learning tech firm dedicated to improving road safety, has yielded the largest dataset of its kind in the U.S., which will help inform the driving of its own automated vehicles.

As part of its latest research with Nexar, Waymo has reconstructed hundreds of crashes involving what it calls ‘vulnerable road users’ (VRUs), such as pedestrians walking through crosswalks, biyclists in city streets, or high-speed motorcycle riders on highways.

Read more