Skip to main content

Neptune Pine review

Yes, we really had to wear this in public to review it for you

Neptune Pine
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Neptune Pine
MSRP $349.00
“The Neptune Pine may combine the functionality of an (old) Android smartphone into a smartwatch, but it’s flaws outweigh any positives. It’s too big, too heavy, and too ugly.”
Pros
  • A whole smartphone on your wrist
  • Bluetooth calling works well
  • A geeky Android fan’s dream
Cons
  • No Google Play Store access
  • Awkward, heavy, and large
  • Unattractive design
  • Touchscreen not responsive enough
  • Difficult to remove the body from the strap

Smartwatches, as we know them, are all about connecting to our smartphones then delivering notifications, emails, GPS directions, and other tidbits of info to our wrists. The idea is to cut down the times we need to check the phone itself, ensuring it safely stays in a bag or pocket.

Recommended Videos

Neptune Pine has a different mission. It’s hoped to replace your phone entirely since it began life on Kickstarter at the end of 2013, when it went on to raise eight times its $100,000 goal.

So, is it a great idea or an ambitious, but flawed project that’s best left to the geeks?

Looks and design

The way the Neptune Pine looks is probably its greatest weakness. It’s big, heavy, annoyingly ungainly, and often uncomfortable. The dimensions of the face come in at 6.5cm wide, 5cm tall, and 1.5cm deep. Even the strap is massive, at nearly 3.5cm wide. If you called the Neptune Pine ‘subtle’ in any way, you’d be lying.

If you called the Neptune Pine ‘subtle’ in any way, you’d be lying.

On the right hand side you find the power and volume keys, and on the other, a 3.5mm headphone socket. The entire casing and buttons are made from plastic, and not the most expensive feeling plastic either. The strap is thick and robust, but it would be more pliant if it was made from silicone.

The Neptune Pine is the first wearable device where I’ve had to consider what I wear with it. Because it’s so giant, it doesn’t fit underneath some shirt sleeves unless you leave them open and flapping in the breeze. This presented another issue. It’s comically massive, and I felt very self-conscious with it on. It’s not look-at-me geeky cool like Google Glass, but look-at-me-aren’t-I-sad instead.

This made me want to cover it up, except it protrudes through most items of clothing like a bulbous, unsightly wart. I’m someone who likes wearable tech, so it’s hard to see how the Neptune Pine could appeal to anyone who is still on the fence.

Software and apps

Android 4.1.2 is installed on the Pine, but it’s a non-Google approved version, which means you don’t get the Play Store, or any other Google services. Now, this isn’t the end of the world, and most things can be side-loaded. We put the Play Store, Hangouts, and Google Play Services on the review unit, and after a little fiddling around, they worked. Most of the time.

Using Android Jelly Bean is like stepping into a time machine, but not in a fun retro way. It only serves as a reminder of how much Android has improved over the past few years, and using an old version is often painful. There’s no Google Now, the icons are blocky and ugly, and everything feels a bit low-tech and messy.

However, this is the same Android 4.1.2 you would have used on an actual smartphone, which means the Pine can make and receive calls, just like a regular phone. This is where the Pine does shine. It has everything you’d normally do with your phone, just on your wrist. Link it up to a Bluetooth headset, and the call quality is great. Remember, making calls on the Neptune Pine without a headset just makes you look like a dick, not Dick Tracy.

Get past the ancient version of Android, and the Pine performs well, but the touchscreen can be slow to respond, and there’s a definite knack to getting it to unlock with a swipe. Some of the smaller buttons are also awkward to press, and often take several stabs to activate. It’s responsive and large enough to handle a pattern unlock code though, which is a good thing because the PIN security screen is too small.

Some of the problems encountered trying to use Android on the Pine can be countered by removing the body from the strap, and using it like a tiny phone. It certainly makes it quicker to perform some tasks, and much easier to play games, but it does defeat the object of it being a watch. If I want to hold something, why wouldn’t I just use a proper phone?

The watch comes with eight non-standard apps installed, including Facebook, WhatsApp, Angry Birds, Fruit Ninja, and Skype. There’s 2GB of internal memory, and a MicroSD card slot.

Processing and specs

A 2.4-inch, 320 x 240 pixel touchscreen is fitted to the front of the Pine, and it’s driven by a 1.2GHz dual-core Snapdragon S4 processor, with 512MB of RAM. It connects to 3G and 4G LTE networks, comes with Bluetooth 4.0 (which made syncing with accessories a pleasure), and takes a regular Micro SIM card.

Neptune Pine
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Performance is surprisingly good, despite the lowly specs, and it handles the built-in games — Angry Birds and Fruit Ninja — without a fuss. Even Minion Rush is playable, although the loading times are slow. It’s the size of the screen which makes everything from typing in usernames and passwords, to making a well-timed jump in the aforementioned Minion Rush a pain.

Camera

Provided you don’t expect anything amazing, the Pine’s 5-megapixel camera is acceptable for a smartwatch. If you think you’ll get anything like the performance from a similar camera on a phone — like the Moto G, for example — you’ll be disappointed. It can’t deal with anything other than optimum light conditions. I took two images from both sides of a motorway bridge, and the difference between the two perfectly illustrates how the Pine suffers.

The low resolution screen doesn’t help matters, because even if the picture you’d just taken was a masterpiece, it looks like a muddy, low-res monstrosity on the display. Due to the placement of the lens, the rear camera can’t be used when the Pine’s body is clipped to the wrist strap, but there is a front facing cam for video calls.

Battery

The battery could have been the Neptune Pine’s ultimate downfall, but it’s not terrible, depending on use. In standby, with a few messages, a call, and some camera usage, the Pine easily lasted the day. However, start doing anything more complicated, such as using Google Maps, playing a game, or leaving Bluetooth connected, and a day is about all you’ll get.

Neptune Pine
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It’s not really a smartwatch, it’s a smartphone, therefore you get smartphone battery life. It’ll need a visit to the charger every couple of days, provided you don’t go mad with heavy usage. Full cellular reception made more of a difference here than it does under normal circumstances, and with one or two bars, the Pine’s battery did suffer.

Conclusion

Ugly, heavy, and a lot of the time, rather annoying to use: that sums up the Neptune Pine. However, it’s not without a certain charm, and when paired with a Bluetooth headset worked really well as an actual phone. It’s just the effort needed to wear it around all day, everyday, is off-putting.

Squeezing an entire smartphone into a wrist-worn device isn’t an easy task. The Pine puts in a valiant effort, but there are too many compromises for it to appeal to regular people. Like many Kickstarter projects, the Neptune Pine is for geeks who’re happy to tinker around with it, and willing to put up with its idiosyncrasies. There’s no denying it stands out though. Whether that’s a good thing or not, depends on your opinion of the design.

Highs

  • A whole smartphone on your wrist
  • Bluetooth calling works well
  • A geeky Android fan’s dream

Lows

  • No Google Play Store access
  • Awkward, heavy, and large
  • Unattractive design
  • Touchscreen not responsive enough
  • Difficult to remove the body from the strap
Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
TicWatch reveals a $350 Apple Watch Ultra competitor, and it looks great
The TicWatch Atlas

Are you tired of the sky-high prices of the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra and Apple Watch Ultra 2? Mobvoi's new TicWatch Atlas offers a compelling alternative without breaking the bank. At just $350, this rugged smartwatch packs a punch with a long list of impressive features and a durable design that aims to replicate the "Ultra" smartwatch experience at a much lower price.

Crafted with a sandblasted stainless steel body, the TicWatch Atlas is built to withstand the elements and handle even the most demanding environments. But it's not just about durability; this smartwatch has advanced health and fitness tracking capabilities as well.

Read more
The Pocuter Spectra sets a new standard for smartwatch repairability
A photo of the Spectra watch laying on a table.

The smartwatch world is crowded, but the ones at the top tower far above the rest of the competition. Few smartwatches released in the past several years have reached the level of success found by the Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch, but the Spectra might just give them a run for their money.

The Spectra from Pocuter is a new player on the smartwatch scene that's currently just starting its Kickstarter campaign. It has a retrofuturistic vibe that makes it feel like something from an early Bond film, but there's a reason it has a thicker aluminum shell than most watches: it's entirely user-repairable.

Read more
We just got our first peek at Xiaomi’s latest smartwatch, and it looks great
a cheap fitness band is still better than smartwatch xiaomi mi smart 5

Smartwatches are already one of the most popular wearables you can buy right now, and Xiaomi is steering full steam ahead into that market. Renders just dropped for its latest smartwatch, the Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro, and it looks absolutely gorgeous. We're not sure when the new watch is supposed to release, but the Smart Band 9 launched in August — less than a year after the release of the Smart Band 8 Pro.

There are a few noticeable differences in these new renders that suggest changes from the style the smartwatch previously held. The display looks a bit curvier, with a bend to it not seen in the Smart Band 9. There are also changes to the appearance of the housing (it looks slightly more matte) and to the clasp.

Read more