Skip to main content

The NSA claims its systems are too complex to stop deleting incriminating data

spying is expensive nsa surveillance program may cost more than 35 billion seal
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The NSA is claiming that its systems are so complex that it cannot prevent the destruction of evidence that may be damaging to its case in a lawsuit against privacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). 

In the case in question, Jewel vs. NSA, which was filed in 2008, the EFF sued the NSA on behalf of AT&T customers. The EFF claims that the NSA unlawfully collected information and records of Americans’ Internet and telephone use. Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Jeffrey White issued an emergency order that prohibited the NSA from destroying data that the EFF had asked for in the lawsuit. The agency is fighting the directive. According to the Washington Post, the NSA is arguing that holding on to the data it collects about the phone and Internet activities of American citizens is too burdensome.  

Recommended Videos

“A requirement to preserve all data acquired under section 702 presents significant operational problems, only one of which is that the NSA may have to shut down all systems and databases that contain Section 702 information,” said NSA Deputy Director Richard Ledgett in a court filing.

“Communications acquired pursuant to Section 702 reside within multiple databases contained on multiple systems and the precise manner in which NSA stays consistent with its legal obligations under the [FISA Amendments Act] has resulted from years of detailed interaction,” he added.

Section 702 refers to a portion of the Amendments Act of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The legislation, which allowed the NSA to collect “content of communications” such as emails, Facebook messages, and web browsing histories, has been used by the NSA to justify its surveillance activities. 

Declassified documents that contain the testimony of Teresa H. Shea, the agency’s director for its Signals Intelligence Directorate (SID), outline the prescribed period for retaining the data. “Since May 2006, the NSA has collected bulk telephony metadata pursuant to FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) orders directing telecommunications service providers to produce to the NSA on a daily basis electronic copies of ‘call detail’ records created by the recipient providers for calls to, from, or wholly within the United States,” Shea said.

“To protect U.S. person information the FISC’s orders impose procedures to minimize access to use, dissemination, and retention of the data consistent with the need to acquire, produce and disseminate foreign intelligence information. Among these is the requirement to destroy all bulk telephony metadata obtained under the FISC’s Section 215 orders within five years (60 months) of the data’s collection,” Shea said.  

Ledgett also stated that the agency erases data through “a combination of technical and human-based processes.”

The EFF is using the NSA’s argument to its advantage. Cindy Cohn, the EFF’s legal director, said that the agency’s inability to track the data it collects shows the dangers of conducting such a wide-reaching surveillance program.

“To me, it demonstrates that once the government has custody of this information even they can’t keep track of it anymore even for purposes of what they don’t want to destroy,” she told the Washington Post. “With the huge amounts of data that they’re gathering it’s not surprising to me that it’s difficult to keep track– that’s why I think it’s so dangerous for them to be collecting all this data en masse.” 

The EFF’s full complaint can be found here. If you want a more detailed look at how the NSA collects your phone and Internet records, you can read Shea’s testimony here. However, know that some details are still hidden because parts of Shea’s comments have been redacted.

Christian Brazil Bautista
Christian Brazil Bautista is an experienced journalist who has been writing about technology and music for the past decade…
The best Apple iPhone 16 Plus cases for 2024
A person taking a photo with the Apple iPhone 16 Plus.

The iPhone 16 series is available now, including the big and powerful iPhone 16 Plus. While you're choosing exactly what color you want for your shiny new phone, you should also look into a case to protect it from those times when you have butterfingers.

Although the iPhone 16 Plus is plenty durable on its own, a case can help you show off its design while protecting it against scratches. Even if you are really careful and you don't drop your phone, a touchscreen in the same pocket as your car keys is a recipe for disaster. Even a short drop can shatter a screen if it hits at the right angle. A good case will protect not only the screen but the cameras, sides, and ports of the phone, too.

Read more
The best Android phones in 2024: the 15 best ones you can buy
The OnePlus 12 and Pixel 8's screens.

When purchasing a new Android phone, several essential factors must be considered. Do you prefer a large screen for watching videos and playing games? How important is camera performance, especially if you enjoy taking high-quality photos? Are you someone who enjoys gaming on your phone and requires a device with excellent performance? Or do you need long-lasting battery life to keep up with your busy schedule?

This article aims to help you find the best Android phone that meets your specific needs in 2024. We have compiled a comprehensive list of Android phones catering to every type of requirement, including screen size, camera quality, gaming performance, and battery life.

Read more
Spotify vs. Pandora: which streaming service should you choose?
spotify vs pandora on iphone

Let's settle a musical debate: which music streaming platform should you use: Spotify or Pandora?

Both services have their unique strengths and weaknesses. Spotify boasts a more extensive music catalog, robust social features for sharing and discovering music with friends, and a more polished user experience across devices.

Read more