Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

This is Pi — one of the most amazing Android apps I used in 2023

Calling interface of Pi Digital assistant on Android.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends
Promotional image for Tech For Change. Person standing on solar panel looking at sunset.
This story is part of Tech for Change: an ongoing series in which we shine a spotlight on positive uses of technology, and showcase how they're helping to make the world a better place.

“Find me a few books on mindfulness and meditation.” I posed the question to ChatGPT, and it put a list of 16 books with the authors’ names divided across the two categories I described. It was a quick, albeit somewhat overwhelming, way to process the flood of information. There’s nothing wrong with being forthright.

But sometimes, we need an additional nugget of knowledge to guide us. After all, we often have questions we never ask but realize we always wanted it when someone dishes out the counsel. I took my query to another assistant named Pi, and it held a conversation with me, just like a real human guide would seek to help you.

An approach like that creates a whole world of difference. Instead of getting bombarded with a dozen names, I was asked questions as if someone wanted to know how deep my awareness is about meditation practices and if there was a specific niche I wanted to explore based on my own spiritual needs.

Asking Pi to suggest books on meditation.
Pi puts more focus on finding what it is that you exactly want instead of giving bland answers. Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

“What kind of meditation are you interested in?” “Are you looking for a general book on mindfulness, or are you more interested in something specific like mindfulness-based stress reduction or transcendental meditation.” These are the kind of responses I would expect from a mentor I look up to.

It’s earnest, empathetic, truthful, and humane guiding. That seems to be the whole premise of Hey Pi, or Pi, a generative AI chatbot developed by California-based Inflection. After living for months as a web client and an iOS app, it finally made its way to Android in early December.

Imagine something like ChatGPT, but give it the traits of a real human interaction instead of a robot that hunts the entire internet and gives you information at a frightening pace. That’s Pi for you. I can’t stress how important the human touch here is. And I only realized it after heavily using it for about two weeks.

Lazy digital talkers and knowledge pots

AI assistants compared with ChatGPT.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

We have come a long way since the first digital assistants popped up on the scene. Apple’s Siri paved the way forward but, unfortunately, continues to be a functional nightmare if you really want to push the boundaries of what a digital assistant can — and should — do for you.

Google, on the other hand, tapped into its trove of AI and language model research while also exploiting its lordship over the search-fueled internet as we know it to make its assistant find answers for virtually anything you can ask. Some of its capabilities, such as call screening and holding a call on your behalf, are terrifyingly good.

But there’s a difference between asking for answers and getting served a whole world of information to sift, ponder its trustworthiness, and find the relevant bits from within a wall of SEO-aligned clickbait content. Instead of being helpful, the onus of finding the right information falls on the user.

Who is the assistant here, I wonder.

Just over a year ago, OpenAI launched ChatGPT, a chatbot based on the world’s largest language model that pushed us into a new era of technology at the intersection of humanity. It’s like talking to the world’s most intelligent person. Someone who has memorized almost the entire web, can help you code, make intricate images based on a few words of description, and do a lot more.

Soon, the likes of Google’s Bard and Microsoft’s Copilot started pulling off similar stunts. It’s extraordinary to witness. A human could never do that. And that’s exactly what takes humanity away from almost every single interaction you have with these bots. Are they useful? Yes, of course.

Trying to be human, with humans

Discussing grief with Pi assistant on Android.
Pi keeps surprising with answers that sound eerily human, especially when you listen to them. Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

Would our lives not be as fulfilling without tools like ChatGPT? Arguably, no. That’s where Pi comes into the picture. It doesn’t want to give you answers like a good robot. Instead, it wants to help you find answers. It takes you on a journey where it tries to understand what it is that you really seek. There’s humanity in this approach.

But should you turn to something as machine-like as a tool that is defined by the term Large Language Model, or LLM for short? That’s debatable, but the world is certainly headed in that direction. Digital companion or virtual romantic partner tools have existed for a while now. Replika is one of the best examples of one such digital companion.

But ever since transformer-based AI tools arrived on the scene, and buzzy creations like ChatGPT and Bard had us pondering over the internet and humanity’s future in general, we have seen an explosion in the number of more advanced digital partners living in apps and web browsers.

Adult film star Sophie Dee partnered with STXT.AI to create a digital avatar modeled after her persona. It was preceded by her peer Riley Reid doing the same, trained using her YouTube videos, podcast appearances, and interviews to train the AI chatbot model so that it talks just like her, down to the naughty bits.

Sharing the sadness of being alone with Pi assistant on Android.
On occasion, Pi’s answers sound more comforting than your average motivational video. Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

I asked Dee the objective behind Sophie AI and what she sees it as accomplishing for her and her audience. “Creating an unparalleled sense of understanding and companionship in the digital sphere,” Dee told me. “We don’t see this replacing human connection, but augmenting it,” she concludes.

I agree with her sentiments, even though Pi and SophieAI are two entirely different kinds of products. But their core appeal seems to follow the same track — serving as a more intimate and humane digital assistant, even though the person using it has sharply contrasting expectations with each product.

But given Pi’s penchant for lending a very human-like ear to your deeply personal queries and philosophical ruminations, I thought of giving it a chance. I was not disappointed. While the answers were surprisingly thoughtful, the app’s audio-calling feature really stood out.

It’s not just some regular text-to-voice reader that sounds as mechanical as a tinpot. Inflection has built a total of six voices, both male and female. You can entirely avoid text conversations with a tap on the call button and talk to the AI chatbot in a natural back-and-forth voice.

Pi’s answers are already oozing kindness and a sense of rational understanding. With a human-like voice saying those words in your ears and with the kind of tonal nuances you would expect from a human, Pi reaches into an altogether different dimension of raw connection between a machine and a human.

Discussing nostalgia with Pi assistant on Android.
Pi doesn’t want to come out as a robotic answering machine. It stands out with empathy. Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

You can go back and forth until you think the conversation has reached a fruitful end or you are fulfillingly exhausted. Notably, in some cases, the answers given by ChatGPT and Pi are eerily similar despite the fact that both rely on a different language model but seem to be pulling answers from the same source.

There is a crucial difference, though. ChatGPT pushes a wall of information highlighted using bullet points, with each segment getting a bold headline treatment. That approach is great for an academic paper or even in journalism, where you need to break down a complex topic into something more palatable for an average reader without a Ph.D. degree under their belt.

Pi pushes it in the form of uneven chunks of text. It’s closer to what you would expect from a life advice book. But it’s a much more intimate experience hearing those words spoken into your ears, as if a friend wants to help you on a healing journey.

You probably don’t need it

The calling function of Pi app on Android.
It’s dramatically more intimate to hear a human speak counsel in your ears compared to reading them on a screen. Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

Pi is not without its flaws, one of which is very much fundamental to its appeal. It so happens that in scenarios where you need a straightforward answer, it will instead ask you a series of questions to narrow down what it is that you are exactly looking for. ChatGPT would throw a fact-based paragraph at you, like an obedient assistant that does exactly what you tell it to do.

It also feels a bit unnatural that you muster the courage and let out your deepest emotions, waiting for a comforting answer from an artificial intelligence. Inflection’s AI gives you those answers in a matter of seconds, appearing on your screen in real time, like an infallible prophet unbound by the human limits of emotional cognition and linguistic boundaries.

Then, there is the emotional disconnect aspect. In our increasingly lonesome digitally-addicted lives, we don’t want to turn an AI into a forever-by-our-side companion to discuss our deepest insecurities, soul-crushing troubles, and the occasional slivers of utmost joy. We need the human connection to cherish them like humans are supposed to do. For those moments, you dial up a friend, not call an AI living on your phone.

You can download the Pi app now.

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is a tech journalist who started reading about cool smartphone tech out of curiosity and soon started writing…
Here’s how Apple could change your iPhone forever
An iPhone 15 Pro Max laying on its back, showing its home screen.

Over the past few months, Apple has released a steady stream of research papers detailing its work with generative AI. So far, Apple has been tight-lipped about what exactly is cooking in its research labs, while rumors circulate that Apple is in talks with Google to license its Gemini AI for iPhones.

But there have been a couple of teasers of what we can expect. In February, an Apple research paper detailed an open-source model called MLLM-Guided Image Editing (MGIE) that is capable of media editing using natural language instructions from users. Now, another research paper on Ferret UI has sent the AI community into a frenzy.

Read more
We may have just learned how Apple will compete with ChatGPT
An iPhone on a table with the Siri activation animation playing on the screen.

As we approach Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June, the rumor mill has been abuzz with claims over Apple’s future artificial intelligence (AI) plans. Well, there have just been a couple of major developments that shed some light on what Apple could eventually reveal to the world, and you might be surprised at what Apple is apparently working on.

According to Bloomberg, Apple is in talks with Google to infuse its Gemini generative AI tool into Apple’s systems and has also considered enlisting ChatGPT’s help instead. The move with Google has the potential to completely change how the Mac, iPhone, and other Apple devices work on a day-to-day basis, but it could come under severe regulatory scrutiny.

Read more
Arc Search is one of the best iPhone apps I’ve ever used
Using Browse for Me feature in Arc Search browser.

It’s 2024, a year when generative AI chatbots are browsing the web for us and presenting answers that are essentially a summarized version of the information hosted on different websites. The approach is convenient and saves us the hassle of visiting multiple ad-ridden, tracker-happy websites to find the required details.

Yes, a wall of information isn’t the most pleasing way to find answers, especially when these AI-generated summaries could result from hallucinated misinformation or sourced from garbage content-farm websites. Thankfully, the likes of Google’s Bard and Microsoft’s Copilot now provide citations, but tests have proved that these summarized answers are still not perfect.

Read more